<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USSM Mailbag: Meche heads to arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:17:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tod</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86923</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86923</guid>
		<description>If I hold my nose and overlook the fact that Gil Meche is getting $3.7 million, Bavasi has demonstrated a nice trend of getting  folks such as Bloomquist and Meche to agree to less than a fifty-fifty split.  I particularly like the Meche incentives, since they have improbably high thresholds - if he gets them, he will have earned his salary.  (Of course, if the budget reserves for incentives on a dollar-for-dollar basis, as a fan their unlikely-acheiveability isn&#039;t doing much for me.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I hold my nose and overlook the fact that Gil Meche is getting $3.7 million, Bavasi has demonstrated a nice trend of getting  folks such as Bloomquist and Meche to agree to less than a fifty-fifty split.  I particularly like the Meche incentives, since they have improbably high thresholds &#8211; if he gets them, he will have earned his salary.  (Of course, if the budget reserves for incentives on a dollar-for-dollar basis, as a fan their unlikely-acheiveability isn&#8217;t doing much for me.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86919</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86919</guid>
		<description>Heard on KJR that Meche and the M&#039;s have come to terms (I&#039;d assume at the halfway point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard on KJR that Meche and the M&#8217;s have come to terms (I&#8217;d assume at the halfway point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badperson</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86837</link>
		<dc:creator>Badperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86837</guid>
		<description>#51, It seems to me that the one tiny advantage Meche has is that we only are stuck with him for a year.  With free agents, it&#039;s often hard to avoid longer contracts.  I&#039;m fairly sure we could have gotten Kevin Brown for a year (since he&#039;s so old) but I don&#039;t see why he would be leaps and bounds better than Meche. 

I agree with your angst over the Everett+Washburn+Meche = Johson+Millwood+Loaiza, I just got done having it when we signed Washburn.

As far as Moyer not being a good risk, I think the Moyer fans are squinting really hard at his home 2005 numbers.  In the article about Defense on this site, I learn that a good sample size is 2 years.  Over the last 2 years, Moyer struck out 5/9 ip, and walked 2.6/9 ip.  I don&#039;t have his groundball percentage rate, but he did give up 67 dingers in that time so I doubt it was stupendous.  Apply a reasonable amount of regression for being 43 years old, and you get what?  4.5K/9ip, 3bb/9ip?  Whoopee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#51, It seems to me that the one tiny advantage Meche has is that we only are stuck with him for a year.  With free agents, it&#8217;s often hard to avoid longer contracts.  I&#8217;m fairly sure we could have gotten Kevin Brown for a year (since he&#8217;s so old) but I don&#8217;t see why he would be leaps and bounds better than Meche. </p>
<p>I agree with your angst over the Everett+Washburn+Meche = Johson+Millwood+Loaiza, I just got done having it when we signed Washburn.</p>
<p>As far as Moyer not being a good risk, I think the Moyer fans are squinting really hard at his home 2005 numbers.  In the article about Defense on this site, I learn that a good sample size is 2 years.  Over the last 2 years, Moyer struck out 5/9 ip, and walked 2.6/9 ip.  I don&#8217;t have his groundball percentage rate, but he did give up 67 dingers in that time so I doubt it was stupendous.  Apply a reasonable amount of regression for being 43 years old, and you get what?  4.5K/9ip, 3bb/9ip?  Whoopee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86836</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86836</guid>
		<description>DMZ, which part DID make sense? I couldn&#039;t tell.

On the point in 54- Well, I suspect we would, because he MIGHT be executing the Chris Carpenter/Jason Schmidt turnaround at age 27, and going from being a pitcher with no idea where the ball&#039;s going to a good pitcher. My problem is that paying $4 million to see if he can do this is the roster equivalent of taking your 401k when you retire and buying lottery tickets as a wealth-building strategy. Could it pay off? Sure. Is it a wise strategy? No, not really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ, which part DID make sense? I couldn&#8217;t tell.</p>
<p>On the point in 54- Well, I suspect we would, because he MIGHT be executing the Chris Carpenter/Jason Schmidt turnaround at age 27, and going from being a pitcher with no idea where the ball&#8217;s going to a good pitcher. My problem is that paying $4 million to see if he can do this is the roster equivalent of taking your 401k when you retire and buying lottery tickets as a wealth-building strategy. Could it pay off? Sure. Is it a wise strategy? No, not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Egaas</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Egaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86829</guid>
		<description>When it comes down to it, we can&#039;t really win with Meche.  We&#039;re already paying him 4 million plus... if he has a good season, he&#039;ll likely command a large, multi-year deal, if not from us, than from somebody else.  Do we really want to give him that, if he posts one solid season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes down to it, we can&#8217;t really win with Meche.  We&#8217;re already paying him 4 million plus&#8230; if he has a good season, he&#8217;ll likely command a large, multi-year deal, if not from us, than from somebody else.  Do we really want to give him that, if he posts one solid season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86827</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86827</guid>
		<description>That made almost no sense at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That made almost no sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar For Pres</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86826</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar For Pres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86826</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather go with Meche than go dumpster diving.  Meche has been consistantly inconsistant and has pissed us all off at points.  He&#039;s going to be on our team for the same reason that Thorton will be on the team.  I hope Meche puts it together next year.  If he does great, if he doesn&#039;t then bump him out of the rotation.  I think(hope) Meche will likely do better than Moyer this year.  He&#039;s one of the guys that I still want to see put it together.  He&#039;s still only 27 and has some stuff that can be good but just needs to be consistant for an entire game.  $4 mil is a little steep but I think its a better deal than any FA on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather go with Meche than go dumpster diving.  Meche has been consistantly inconsistant and has pissed us all off at points.  He&#8217;s going to be on our team for the same reason that Thorton will be on the team.  I hope Meche puts it together next year.  If he does great, if he doesn&#8217;t then bump him out of the rotation.  I think(hope) Meche will likely do better than Moyer this year.  He&#8217;s one of the guys that I still want to see put it together.  He&#8217;s still only 27 and has some stuff that can be good but just needs to be consistant for an entire game.  $4 mil is a little steep but I think its a better deal than any FA on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-2/#comment-86808</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86808</guid>
		<description>Seriously? You could have picked up Jason Johnson for about what you&#039;re going to pay Meche. You could dumpster dive for the Halamas and Browns of the world on NRIs (I don&#039;t like Kevin Brown&#039;s chances of being very good very much...but he might have a better shot than Gil Meche). Sift through the young arms and wait for the midseason to pull in another starter.

I wasn&#039;t aware that Tomko went to LA for that much- under the circumstances, no I wouldn&#039;t have gone for him.

&lt;i&gt;As to him playing better last year than Everett, yeah, but heâ€™s a year older this year.&lt;/i&gt;

So&#039;s Everett, and Moyer&#039;s usefulness at this age isn&#039;t ENTIRELY unprecedented- knuckleballers and guys like Warren Spahn made it to this point. He&#039;s a risk, sure. As far as a big risk...not really. I wouldn&#039;t have sobbed bitter tears if we had gone a different direction, mind you. But what&#039;s frustrating, though? Add up Everett, Meche, Moyer and Washburn and you&#039;re VERY close to Johnson, Millwood and Loaiza... and you still have Matt Lawton, and you might even be able to scrounge up a RH bat to platoon in LF for 750K to 1 million. Aaaargh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? You could have picked up Jason Johnson for about what you&#8217;re going to pay Meche. You could dumpster dive for the Halamas and Browns of the world on NRIs (I don&#8217;t like Kevin Brown&#8217;s chances of being very good very much&#8230;but he might have a better shot than Gil Meche). Sift through the young arms and wait for the midseason to pull in another starter.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware that Tomko went to LA for that much- under the circumstances, no I wouldn&#8217;t have gone for him.</p>
<p><i>As to him playing better last year than Everett, yeah, but heâ€™s a year older this year.</i></p>
<p>So&#8217;s Everett, and Moyer&#8217;s usefulness at this age isn&#8217;t ENTIRELY unprecedented- knuckleballers and guys like Warren Spahn made it to this point. He&#8217;s a risk, sure. As far as a big risk&#8230;not really. I wouldn&#8217;t have sobbed bitter tears if we had gone a different direction, mind you. But what&#8217;s frustrating, though? Add up Everett, Meche, Moyer and Washburn and you&#8217;re VERY close to Johnson, Millwood and Loaiza&#8230; and you still have Matt Lawton, and you might even be able to scrounge up a RH bat to platoon in LF for 750K to 1 million. Aaaargh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-86807</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86807</guid>
		<description>The small sample size red flag applies to Bazardo&#039;s winter league stats.  Matt Thornton posted crazy good K/BB last winter, and it did not help him come spring.

Bazardo is certainly promising, but his AA stats (142 IP, 99/47 K/BB, 16 HR, 4.06 raw ERA, 1.56 G/F) do not suggest he&#039;s major league ready.  Let him spend some time in Tacoma finding consistency for his curve and developing his change.

The Meche tender reflects that, while the M&#039;s have some good upper level arms, it would be unfair to expect any of them to step right into a rotation spot out of spring training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The small sample size red flag applies to Bazardo&#8217;s winter league stats.  Matt Thornton posted crazy good K/BB last winter, and it did not help him come spring.</p>
<p>Bazardo is certainly promising, but his AA stats (142 IP, 99/47 K/BB, 16 HR, 4.06 raw ERA, 1.56 G/F) do not suggest he&#8217;s major league ready.  Let him spend some time in Tacoma finding consistency for his curve and developing his change.</p>
<p>The Meche tender reflects that, while the M&#8217;s have some good upper level arms, it would be unfair to expect any of them to step right into a rotation spot out of spring training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LF Monster</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/23/ussm-mailbag-meche-heads-to-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-86803</link>
		<dc:creator>LF Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3282#comment-86803</guid>
		<description>Bazardo is a cheaper option.  Rich Dorman is a cheaper option.  I think PR wise you wouldn&#039;t want to dump Meche and replace him with anything in house short of an excellent young starter.  But a few young guys are proving what they can in Winterball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bazardo is a cheaper option.  Rich Dorman is a cheaper option.  I think PR wise you wouldn&#8217;t want to dump Meche and replace him with anything in house short of an excellent young starter.  But a few young guys are proving what they can in Winterball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
