<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bronson Arroyo traded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James T</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-90054</link>
		<dc:creator>James T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-90054</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Red Sox fan and my only reservation of any sort about this deal is that Arroyo was, apparently, a hell of a nice guy and wanted to stick around with the Sox.  

But we&#039;ve probably seen Arroyo&#039;s ceiling.  Pena&#039;s got tremendous power and if I weren&#039;t so computer ignorant I&#039;d supply a link of a story from a Dayton Ohio paper that should make any Sox fan very optimistic about him. (there were links to it at Sons of Sam Horn).  Pena explicitly acknowledges that he hasn&#039;t been as disciplined as he should be and that he should be taking a lot more pitches.  

Pena actually was more patient in Winter League games, with 13 walks in 80 at bats and seemed under control in WBC games, too.  I guess the hope from a Sox fan perspective is that he&#039;ll try and live up to the nice words and heed the counsel of Big Papi and Manny and get his pitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Red Sox fan and my only reservation of any sort about this deal is that Arroyo was, apparently, a hell of a nice guy and wanted to stick around with the Sox.  </p>
<p>But we&#8217;ve probably seen Arroyo&#8217;s ceiling.  Pena&#8217;s got tremendous power and if I weren&#8217;t so computer ignorant I&#8217;d supply a link of a story from a Dayton Ohio paper that should make any Sox fan very optimistic about him. (there were links to it at Sons of Sam Horn).  Pena explicitly acknowledges that he hasn&#8217;t been as disciplined as he should be and that he should be taking a lot more pitches.  </p>
<p>Pena actually was more patient in Winter League games, with 13 walks in 80 at bats and seemed under control in WBC games, too.  I guess the hope from a Sox fan perspective is that he&#8217;ll try and live up to the nice words and heed the counsel of Big Papi and Manny and get his pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanM</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-90031</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-90031</guid>
		<description>WMP already has alot of value to a major league team. 51 career homeruns after his age 23 season? Is it really far-fetched to assume there is no improvement? He has been younger or the same age as the NL rookie of the year each of his 4 years. We&#039;re not talking about a journeyman here. PECOTA absolutely loves the guy. For someone like Bronson Arroyo, who&#039;s value is that he&#039;s consistently mediocre, you&#039;ve gotta make this move 10 times out of 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WMP already has alot of value to a major league team. 51 career homeruns after his age 23 season? Is it really far-fetched to assume there is no improvement? He has been younger or the same age as the NL rookie of the year each of his 4 years. We&#8217;re not talking about a journeyman here. PECOTA absolutely loves the guy. For someone like Bronson Arroyo, who&#8217;s value is that he&#8217;s consistently mediocre, you&#8217;ve gotta make this move 10 times out of 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Egaas</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-90002</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Egaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-90002</guid>
		<description>I figured Wily Mo was part of their build for the future.  Gotta imagine Griffey won&#039;t play for that much longer, they had to build around Pena, Dunn, Kearns, Freel, Lopez, and Encarnacion.

I stand mistaken, but the Reds ownership can make a lot of people stand mistaken.

How much is that Cincinatti rotation making now?  I feel one could get more pleasure out of flushing some of that money down the toilet, flying to Australia, and proceed to flush the remainder of it and watching it swirl down in an opposite direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured Wily Mo was part of their build for the future.  Gotta imagine Griffey won&#8217;t play for that much longer, they had to build around Pena, Dunn, Kearns, Freel, Lopez, and Encarnacion.</p>
<p>I stand mistaken, but the Reds ownership can make a lot of people stand mistaken.</p>
<p>How much is that Cincinatti rotation making now?  I feel one could get more pleasure out of flushing some of that money down the toilet, flying to Australia, and proceed to flush the remainder of it and watching it swirl down in an opposite direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-90000</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-90000</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, some prospects just don&#039;t pan out.

It&#039;s one thing to have talent, but it&#039;s another thing to put it together and actually make yourself into a Major League player like Edgar Martinez and many others have.

Willy Mo Pena as much talent as he has, may just be like our buddy Matt Thornton in the sense that he can&#039;t put it together in the Major League level. And when that happens for so many years, then it is just time to move on. It&#039;s that simple.

If you are a Major League general manager, your job every year is to try to get your team closer to a World Championship while putting a good enough product on the field to put fans in the seats.

And you just can&#039;t stand around waiting 5 years for players like Willie Mo Pena to develop. At some point you just have say that it is time to move on, and that&#039;s what is happening here.

I think it should defenitely be noted how the Reds new ownership is really being active in changing the look of the front office and some of the on-field personell (like Willie Mo) as they attempt to re-create this team into their own image, it should be interesting to see if that translates into the Reds being big (or at least more active) free agent players next winter. Because the new owners have said that they do want to win a World Series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, some prospects just don&#8217;t pan out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to have talent, but it&#8217;s another thing to put it together and actually make yourself into a Major League player like Edgar Martinez and many others have.</p>
<p>Willy Mo Pena as much talent as he has, may just be like our buddy Matt Thornton in the sense that he can&#8217;t put it together in the Major League level. And when that happens for so many years, then it is just time to move on. It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
<p>If you are a Major League general manager, your job every year is to try to get your team closer to a World Championship while putting a good enough product on the field to put fans in the seats.</p>
<p>And you just can&#8217;t stand around waiting 5 years for players like Willie Mo Pena to develop. At some point you just have say that it is time to move on, and that&#8217;s what is happening here.</p>
<p>I think it should defenitely be noted how the Reds new ownership is really being active in changing the look of the front office and some of the on-field personell (like Willie Mo) as they attempt to re-create this team into their own image, it should be interesting to see if that translates into the Reds being big (or at least more active) free agent players next winter. Because the new owners have said that they do want to win a World Series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typical Idiot Fan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89994</link>
		<dc:creator>Typical Idiot Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89994</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;His K/BB, K/AB, and BB/PA numbers are UGLY. In my estimation heâ€™s got a very good chance of never improving much and a small chance of being one of the best hitters in baseball.&lt;/em&gt;

God, I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one who doesn&#039;t like Wily Mo Pena.

His best season in the minors was at high A ball in 2001 at the age of 20.  Struck out 177 times and posted a pathetic .327 OBP.  In 2004, he struck out 108 times in 110 games and had a worse OBP of .316.  Last year his SLG% didn&#039;t get to .500 and had only an OBP of .304.

His power is undeniable.  27 of his hits were XBH in 2004 (42.5% of his hits), 36 of his 79 in 2005 (45.5%).  So right now Wily Mo is Corey Patterson nestled into the two best ballparks to hit in.  Should be fine for the Red Sox, but that doesn&#039;t mean I have to like his horrific strikeout rates.

Someone explain to me how Wladamir Balentien is less thought of then Wily Mo Pena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>His K/BB, K/AB, and BB/PA numbers are UGLY. In my estimation heâ€™s got a very good chance of never improving much and a small chance of being one of the best hitters in baseball.</em></p>
<p>God, I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one who doesn&#8217;t like Wily Mo Pena.</p>
<p>His best season in the minors was at high A ball in 2001 at the age of 20.  Struck out 177 times and posted a pathetic .327 OBP.  In 2004, he struck out 108 times in 110 games and had a worse OBP of .316.  Last year his SLG% didn&#8217;t get to .500 and had only an OBP of .304.</p>
<p>His power is undeniable.  27 of his hits were XBH in 2004 (42.5% of his hits), 36 of his 79 in 2005 (45.5%).  So right now Wily Mo is Corey Patterson nestled into the two best ballparks to hit in.  Should be fine for the Red Sox, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I have to like his horrific strikeout rates.</p>
<p>Someone explain to me how Wladamir Balentien is less thought of then Wily Mo Pena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89991</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89991</guid>
		<description>Correct- &quot;your head asplode&quot; was in one of Strong Bad&#039;s emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct- &#8220;your head asplode&#8221; was in one of Strong Bad&#8217;s emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89986</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89986</guid>
		<description>I always thought that Seattle should&#039;ve gotten Arroyo and he would&#039;ve been a good fit in our rotation, just not for Jeremy Reed.

Although if Rafael Chaves is the miracle worker that Gil Meche and Joel Pineiro are advertising him to be, I may have to edit that statement a little.

As for eponymous coward&#039;s statement of &quot;my head asplode.&quot; Is there any chance you got that of an internet cartoon? Because I believe I heard that on homestarrunner.com once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that Seattle should&#8217;ve gotten Arroyo and he would&#8217;ve been a good fit in our rotation, just not for Jeremy Reed.</p>
<p>Although if Rafael Chaves is the miracle worker that Gil Meche and Joel Pineiro are advertising him to be, I may have to edit that statement a little.</p>
<p>As for eponymous coward&#8217;s statement of &#8220;my head asplode.&#8221; Is there any chance you got that of an internet cartoon? Because I believe I heard that on homestarrunner.com once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89979</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89979</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The talking heads here in Cincy are giddy over this tradeâ€¦.get thisâ€¦.. the party line is that the Reds improved both their defense and rotation while positively diversifying their offense by replacing Penaâ€™s strikeouts with Hattebergâ€™s at bats. Not only that but the Reds get a proven champion in Arroyo because he has world series experience!&lt;/i&gt;

My head asplode.

Any chance that Cincy needs a gritty 2B?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The talking heads here in Cincy are giddy over this tradeâ€¦.get thisâ€¦.. the party line is that the Reds improved both their defense and rotation while positively diversifying their offense by replacing Penaâ€™s strikeouts with Hattebergâ€™s at bats. Not only that but the Reds get a proven champion in Arroyo because he has world series experience!</i></p>
<p>My head asplode.</p>
<p>Any chance that Cincy needs a gritty 2B?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89978</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89978</guid>
		<description>Just to play devil&#039;s advocate for a minute though..... how would you like to be coco crisp ....  look to the left and ya see manram...look to the right and see wily mo....  good lord, he&#039;d better eat light before those games!  :-)

Im flabbergasted that the Reds essentially had since the trade deadline of last year and this is the best they could do.  Bowden is foaming at the mouth for Pena (he&#039;s put in over 1000 hours trying to pry Pena away from Cincy, the Reds couldve easily got what the Rangers did for Soriano and probably more....

On any given night here&#039;s the infield for the Reds,,,,  Hatteberg at first, Womack at second and Aurilia at third. Then look at Dunn in left and Griffey in center.  Run Milton to the mound and this could easily be a team that would struggle to beat KC in a best of seven. 

The talking heads here in Cincy are giddy over this trade....get this..... the party line is that the Reds improved both their defense and rotation while positively diversifying their offense by replacing Pena&#039;s strikeouts with Hatteberg&#039;s at bats.  Not only that but the Reds get a proven champion in Arroyo because he has world series experience!

Truthfully, Arroyo is an upgrade for the Red&#039;s rotation and he will help them especially on the road.  But this trade is a D- because  the Reds FO pulled it off in a knee jerk reaction to a woeful few days of spring training. They traded a young potential star (albeit one best suited to be a DH) for an arm that will soon be 30 with little upside and whose style is poorly suited for their park.  Arroyo is basically a cheap stop gap. They should&#039;ve done better. What the Reds needed was a 22 year old arm who they could control for the next 6-7 years and who would potentially blossom about the time they actually had a chance to at least be .500. 

What the Reds got was a quick fix that fit their budget at the expense of their future.

This is just the kind of trade that helps a lousy team remain lousy  for years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to play devil&#8217;s advocate for a minute though&#8230;.. how would you like to be coco crisp &#8230;.  look to the left and ya see manram&#8230;look to the right and see wily mo&#8230;.  good lord, he&#8217;d better eat light before those games!  <img src='http://ussmariner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Im flabbergasted that the Reds essentially had since the trade deadline of last year and this is the best they could do.  Bowden is foaming at the mouth for Pena (he&#8217;s put in over 1000 hours trying to pry Pena away from Cincy, the Reds couldve easily got what the Rangers did for Soriano and probably more&#8230;.</p>
<p>On any given night here&#8217;s the infield for the Reds,,,,  Hatteberg at first, Womack at second and Aurilia at third. Then look at Dunn in left and Griffey in center.  Run Milton to the mound and this could easily be a team that would struggle to beat KC in a best of seven. </p>
<p>The talking heads here in Cincy are giddy over this trade&#8230;.get this&#8230;.. the party line is that the Reds improved both their defense and rotation while positively diversifying their offense by replacing Pena&#8217;s strikeouts with Hatteberg&#8217;s at bats.  Not only that but the Reds get a proven champion in Arroyo because he has world series experience!</p>
<p>Truthfully, Arroyo is an upgrade for the Red&#8217;s rotation and he will help them especially on the road.  But this trade is a D- because  the Reds FO pulled it off in a knee jerk reaction to a woeful few days of spring training. They traded a young potential star (albeit one best suited to be a DH) for an arm that will soon be 30 with little upside and whose style is poorly suited for their park.  Arroyo is basically a cheap stop gap. They should&#8217;ve done better. What the Reds needed was a 22 year old arm who they could control for the next 6-7 years and who would potentially blossom about the time they actually had a chance to at least be .500. </p>
<p>What the Reds got was a quick fix that fit their budget at the expense of their future.</p>
<p>This is just the kind of trade that helps a lousy team remain lousy  for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/comment-page-1/#comment-89977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/03/20/bronson-arroyo-traded/#comment-89977</guid>
		<description>This is a hell of a time (and hell of a way) for the Reds to suddenly get &quot;Moneyball&quot; religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a hell of a time (and hell of a way) for the Reds to suddenly get &#8220;Moneyball&#8221; religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
