Game 23, White Sox at Mariners

DMZ · April 26, 2006 at 6:53 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

LHP Buehlre v LHP Washburn. 7:05 FSN.

Bloomquist plays center in the non-platoon platoon… and bats SECOND. It’s that situational hitting he brings to the team.

Other lineup news: Johjima moves ahead of Beltre in the batting order to sixth.

Probably going to be a small game thread, what with the server switch and so many people still pointing in the wrong direction, getting errors and whatnot.

Comments

145 Responses to “Game 23, White Sox at Mariners”

  1. msb on April 26th, 2006 6:55 pm

    hey, Bloomie just kills Buehrle…

    here’s something we all could have used last night later

  2. Smegmalicious on April 26th, 2006 7:01 pm

    This platoon is going to give me an aneurysm. Please, oh powers that be, rid us of Grover!!! There simply is no justification for WFB starting, let alone hitting gsecond.

  3. Jar on April 26th, 2006 7:02 pm

    The Beer Belly, nice.

  4. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:02 pm

    Mmmm, Reuben Dog.

  5. Mock on April 26th, 2006 7:04 pm

    The site is working just fine for me, and there’s really only one problem. My uncle is domintating the TV to watch “On the Record w/ Greta Van Sustenern” (spelling?) on Fox News. Because hearing about all the inactivity in the Natalie Halloway case is excatly what I was hoping for…this is killing me.

  6. joser on April 26th, 2006 7:07 pm

    Let’s see:
    Mariners when facing a left-handed starter this season: 0-6
    Mariners batting average against lefties: .195
    Washburn’s lifetime record vs CWS: 4-5
    Jermaine Dye career vs Washburn: .447…but maybe the homers last night cooled him off some?
    Homers at Safeco this season: M’s 9; everybody else, 21

    The good news is, this one is going to be over quick. Well, unless Grover wanders through the bullpen and the bus from Tacoma looking for arms.

    But hey, maybe Bloomie will start? Let’s put him in the outfield again for added forehead-smacking hilarity!

  7. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Dan Rohn… charting the hitters, charting the pitchers, and charting the layout of his new office.

  8. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:11 pm

    The home base umpire also likes candlelit dinners and long walks on the beach.

  9. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 7:16 pm

    How can you expect a young guy like Reed to learn how to hit lefties when you sit him EVERY damn time we play a lefty…UGH!!

  10. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 7:16 pm

    oh dear god, WFB is batting second? ugh..

  11. joser on April 26th, 2006 7:18 pm

    Didn’t Rizzs say (on the radio last night) that the ump who was going to be behind the plate tonight was just up from the minors and this would be his first major-league game calling balls and strikes? As if things weren’t looking ugly enough already.

  12. Hdizz on April 26th, 2006 7:20 pm

    That’s right, Gil Meche’s shoes were just too tight, and he finally figured it out

  13. Hdizz on April 26th, 2006 7:20 pm

    Now nothing can stop him!

  14. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 7:30 pm

    bases juiced…no outs…beltre up…can you say triple play?

  15. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:30 pm

    And it’s rally killing time!

  16. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 7:30 pm

    Alright Beltre. Whatdya say, kid?

  17. VandalJeff on April 26th, 2006 7:31 pm

    Well, that’s one!

  18. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 7:31 pm

    ill take a ground out rbi for beltre!

  19. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 7:31 pm

    Ok, just as good as a sac fly

  20. Bozo on April 26th, 2006 7:32 pm

    Bases loaded, no one out for Beltre.

    The odds against hitting into a triple play must be astronomical.

    So why do I find myself concerned about the possibility ?

  21. Smegmalicious on April 26th, 2006 7:33 pm

    The Mariners with an early lead? It must be Bizzaro land!

  22. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 7:33 pm

    lopez!!!

  23. realsmack on April 26th, 2006 7:34 pm

    holy crap! yahoooooo !!!!!

  24. Hdizz on April 26th, 2006 7:34 pm

    Man, Lopez and Ibanez, most valuable M’s batters so far

  25. DCFan at GW on April 26th, 2006 7:35 pm

    Wow, 3 early runs. Our pitcher can actually try pitching with a lead.

  26. Sammy on April 26th, 2006 7:39 pm

    That was a nice looking AB by Ichiro. Oh well.

  27. VandalJeff on April 26th, 2006 7:47 pm

    Beautiful….

  28. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 7:47 pm

    F’IN BASERUNNING!!!!

  29. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Bloomquist? What? Starting? Huh? Hitting second? Wha…? But, but… Lopez…?

    Gritty.

    Baserunning idiocy. Vicidin.

  30. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 7:48 pm

    “The greatest baserunner of all time” – everyone on the M’s, referring to WFB

  31. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:48 pm

    The Zephyr got zapped.

  32. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 7:48 pm

    I had a hell of a time getting on tonight. I kept getting a message saying no posts matched my request.

    What I wanted to say was that Washburn is looking like an excellent pick up so far.

  33. JG on April 26th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Gotta love Willie’s scrapiness.

  34. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:49 pm

    “Scampering”?

  35. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 7:49 pm

    Should be 2 on, no out

  36. harry on April 26th, 2006 7:50 pm

    You all must surely see, aggressive baserunning is really what this team needs.

    Yeah.

  37. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 7:50 pm

    I would rather have someone batting over .290 in the lineup, given the number of weak hitters we have. There is some defensive liability, but you can always put Reed in later in the game for defense.

  38. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 7:51 pm

    In all seriousness, does Grover realize how many extra bases the aggresive baserunning has to get us now just to make up for the outs it has already caused?

    If they never made another error on the paths, they wouldn’t even break even until August.

  39. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 7:52 pm

    To Grover’s credit, he had nothing to do with that mistake. It’s not like he called out to Willie

    “Take two!…Oh shit, nevermind, get back!”

  40. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 7:53 pm

    No wonder gas prices are so high, with those Banner Bank customers driving all over the state.

  41. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 7:54 pm

    Rick L… that assumes that the small sample size that brought you the .290 is likely to continue.

    Why would I assume that? I have so much evidence to the contrary.

    This is what I hear every year, “Put Willie in until he stops hitting!” Which invariably happens about 80 at bats before they catch on AGAIN that he is not a major league hitter.

  42. Dave in Palo Alto on April 26th, 2006 7:56 pm

    I am not related in any way to Banner Bank.

  43. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 7:56 pm

    bpdawg24 –

    Grover isn’t to blame because he sent Willie to second… Grover is to blame because he has instilled this ludicrous philosphy of baserunning aggression. this is what you get… over and over again… when you encourage people to run aggressively instead of intelligently.

  44. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 7:57 pm

    41. I agree he is likely to revert to form, but I would like him in until he does stop hitting. Right now, he has the highest average on the team. Meanwhile, Sexson is approaching the Mendoza line. I would also like to see Petagine replacing Everett to see if he can hit better than .220

  45. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:01 pm

    I did not know, however, that “Willie has a cannon of an arm” (Niehaus)

  46. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:03 pm

    43. Agreed. Reckless baserunning is what we have seen. Far too many mistakes that are seen at the high school level, not the bigs.

  47. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 8:03 pm

    45, yea I heard that I was like are you kidding me? What did WFB do to be praised as the greatest Mariners player of all time by everyone but the fans?

  48. msb on April 26th, 2006 8:04 pm

    #29– vicodin. I am trying to get by on ibuprophen,myself.

    the way Rizzs was polishing up the Cy Young for Washburn, I was sure this would e the inning he got killed.

  49. Dave in Palo Alto on April 26th, 2006 8:07 pm

    Catcher speed.

  50. msb on April 26th, 2006 8:07 pm

    hey, turns out Crede has a rocket of an arm. I’m sensing a long throw contest, myself.

  51. TorturedSoul on April 26th, 2006 8:08 pm

    Does Beltre know what his average is?

  52. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 8:10 pm

    #48 – ibuprofen? For an extraction? That’s madness.

    Hey, five hits through four innings is pretty good for us. And three runs in four innings is the very top of our curve.

  53. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:11 pm

    52. Against one of the best pitchers in the AL, it is way above our curve.

  54. msb on April 26th, 2006 8:17 pm

    hey, it was working up to about now– I’m eying the hard stuff though, for overnight….

  55. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:18 pm

    Geez, that was a quick inning. Washburn hardly had time to sit down.

  56. Russ on April 26th, 2006 8:21 pm

    Reed needs to be batting against left handed batters, period. WFM should start periodically at best.

    That said, WFM should be at third over Beltre, at least he is hitting the ball at a greater frequency then Beltre. I say sit Beltre down, screw his pride or ego or whatever. Toughen up buttercup and start hitting, you’ll get your AB’s back.

  57. Norm Charlton Fan Club on April 26th, 2006 8:23 pm

    Washburn looks really good tonight!

  58. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:23 pm

    Maybe the stranding batters thing is a repeatable skill. When Jarrod had two runners on, he worked more methodically…and worked out of the jam.

    If he posts a similar OBPA this year, with similar up front numbers, maybe we should rethink some assumptions that were made prior to the season.

  59. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:24 pm

    Thome looked like a left-handed version of Beltre there.

  60. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:27 pm

    RAUUUUUUULLLLL!!!

  61. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:27 pm

    RAUUUUUUUUL Werewolves of london!

  62. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:27 pm

    With a four run lead, if it holds into the 9th, we can put Guardado in with confidence in a 4-3 victory.

  63. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:29 pm

    58. Washburn was awesome in his last start too.

  64. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 8:30 pm

    Russ –

    Beltre is batting around .300 over the last nine games.

    And how can he get his job back when he starts hitting if he isn’t batting?

  65. sokala on April 26th, 2006 8:30 pm

    Hey, go over to MLB.com and see the lead splash – “White Sox on their mark to take series from M’s” which ironically has the 4 to 0 box score below it.

  66. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:31 pm

    Beltre looked like he hit that ball right on the button. Maybe that would have gone into the upper deck before the steroid ban.

  67. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Get Putz up, Grover.

  68. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:38 pm

    wow

  69. Russ on April 26th, 2006 8:38 pm

    WFM is now a Mariner for life with that gritty catch.

  70. Free Dan Rohn! on April 26th, 2006 8:39 pm

    It almost makes up for his stupid baserunning error earlier in the game.

    Actually, it doesn’t.

  71. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Need a little 2ball real quick to get out of this mess.

  72. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:39 pm

    There goes the Guardado cushion.

  73. Russ on April 26th, 2006 8:40 pm

    John, beats me but I’m a few beers in and I’m mad about Reed getting sat down so often. Logic has little to do with it.

  74. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:40 pm

    What an outing. He has been absolutely terrific these past 2 starts. Jesus, maybe if we could give him some run support every time…

  75. Jay R. on April 26th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Nice work by Washburn.

  76. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:42 pm

    Rick, I agree…Washburn looked great last time. I’m just wondering if there is something to his ability to strand runners that the numbers aren’t telling us.

    It’s very hard to measure. I suppose we’d need a comparison of run expectancy numbers for certain situations where runners are on base, and compare them to Jarrod’s stats in the same situations over 3 years (that should be a big enough sample size to compare).

    If he’s consistenly better than the league…then we might be able to draw some conclusion about him.

  77. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:43 pm

    Alrighty Soriano. You can help out the M’s cause and my fantasy team. How about you mow down everyone you see.

  78. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:44 pm

    Soriano, making it exciting.

  79. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:52 pm

    Soriano has lost a lot of velocity, but he might be a better pitcher than he was when he was throwing 97.

  80. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 8:54 pm

    Well according to the stats over at THT, Wash’s LOB% is at 69.7%

  81. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:54 pm

    I kinda wish he could still throw 97, though…

  82. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:54 pm

    80…what’s league avg. LOB%? Do they have that as well?

  83. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:54 pm

    81. Me too. Maybe it will eventually come back.

  84. Andren on April 26th, 2006 8:55 pm

    Soriano hit 96 the other night.

  85. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 8:55 pm

    By the way that new umpire behind the plate just underhand threw one to Soriano from like 63 feet. Keep that shit up and he’ll be umping highschool JV games in Akron.

  86. John in NV on April 26th, 2006 8:55 pm

    Hopefully some zany teammate has superglued Guardo to the bullpen bench tonight… Please?

  87. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:56 pm

    Got him on an 82 mile an hour pitch.

  88. JoeM on April 26th, 2006 8:57 pm

    Honestly I’m not sure why we’re bagging on WFB versus Reed quite so badly. WFB hits .500 against their pitcher. Ok, then the numbers say play him. Not to mention his defense is not as big of a defensive downgrade as we seem to make it out to be, so the NUMBERS say YES play WFB tonight.

    Until Reed actually HITS major league pitching anywhere close to projections then it makes it hard to stand up for the guy other than saying that his Defense is better than Bloomquist. I’m not necessarily saying WFB for CF, but the platoon seems to be working out numbers wise.

  89. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:57 pm

    80….also, it would seem that LOB% is kind of a blunt instrument to look at since it would treat runners at first, second, or third equally.

    But its a good start I think. Is THT a pay site?

  90. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 8:58 pm

    89- Free oh charge my friend. :-D

  91. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 8:58 pm

    84. That is good news. He also did hit 93 once tonight.

  92. Mr. Egaas on April 26th, 2006 8:58 pm

    THT LOB% stats are all free. Just search “Washburn” and it’ll be the result.

    If Eddie kills this gem, there’s gonna be hell to pay.

  93. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 8:59 pm

    Here’s the big HEATER!

  94. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 9:00 pm

    90 and 92….do you realize what you’ve done to my productivity? This could get me divorced…good times.

  95. Andren on April 26th, 2006 9:01 pm

    91. I’m not getting the game on TV tonight (John in L.A. are you?), but yeah he was mostly at 94 with 1 or 2 heaters hitting 96.

    Coming after Moyer, the new Pineiro and Livingston (maybe) it’s nice to have guns like him and Putz.

  96. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:03 pm

    Johjima should be hitting here, not C-Rex

  97. DCFan at GW on April 26th, 2006 9:04 pm

    Wait a minute, we didn’t carelessly send a runner home? Wow, maybe grover and Co. are learning

  98. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 9:04 pm

    Alright C-Rex, let’s tack on a few more, to ensure that Eddie sits his ass all night.

  99. John in NV on April 26th, 2006 9:06 pm

    Agree with #88 for most part but I did not think that was “a great jump” that WFB got on that “incredible catch.” (Rico)

  100. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:06 pm

    C-Rex makes me eat my words. Sort of.

  101. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 9:06 pm

    YESSIRRRR. No Eddie tonight, in my coffee, no Eddie tonight in my tea!

  102. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 9:09 pm

    94- Then I shouldn’t tell you about the Pitching and Hitter Day to Day database over at Baseball Musings. lol

  103. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:10 pm

    If they get two runners on base, does that make JJ eligible for a save?

  104. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 9:11 pm

    103. No, can’t work your way into a save.

    How about some strikes, JJ?

  105. DCFan at GW on April 26th, 2006 9:12 pm

    Why didn’t we leave Soriano in?

  106. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:13 pm

    Nice DP. Nice play by both YuBet and Lopez.

  107. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 9:14 pm

    NIIIIICE. Me likey splitter.

  108. Jay R. on April 26th, 2006 9:14 pm

    DP! Well executed.

  109. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:14 pm

    That’s the JJ I remember

  110. LB on April 26th, 2006 9:15 pm

    Why didn’t we leave Soriano in?

    When he reaches arbitration, the team wants his number of saves to be as low as possible.

  111. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:15 pm

    Or it was, the JJ I remember for a while.

  112. DCFan at GW on April 26th, 2006 9:16 pm

    110 – and the number of L’s as high as possible… that way they won’t have the money and the arbitor must take it into account

  113. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 9:18 pm

    Andren – yes, 740 on DirecTV.

    88 – Reed, as disappointing as he may have been, has STILL hit better than Willie. And that’s at about the bottom of Reed’s ability. His worst is pretty much better than Willie.

    Not against lefties, but he’s only had 7 at bats against them this year… and why would you want to handicap a promising young player to upgrade to mediocore?

  114. JoeM on April 26th, 2006 9:19 pm

    Reed
    Career: .269/.338/.703 and .230 w/RISP
    2006: .207/.273/.583 and .000 w/RISP
    Bloomquist
    Career: .261/.308/.649 and .260 w/RISP
    2006: .294/.350/.630 and .500 w/RISP

    Reed FP .989 at CF
    Bloomquist FP .971 at CF (1 error in 15 games)

    So…by the numbers why NOT platoon Reed/Bloomquist?

  115. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 9:19 pm

    nerrrrrrvous moments

  116. DCFan at GW on April 26th, 2006 9:19 pm

    A WIN!

  117. carcinogen on April 26th, 2006 9:20 pm

    I’m certainly happy with this…obviously. This was a solid response to the thumping they took yesterday.

  118. LB on April 26th, 2006 9:20 pm

    And Valle begins the tongue bath for Willie. Sigh.

  119. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 9:21 pm

    Nice win.

    With that shot of all of them shaking hands and what not, is it me or does Hassey needs to stay away from the catering table? lol

  120. dan on April 26th, 2006 9:21 pm

    #114 because reed might actually be a good player given enough playing time, and using bloomquist as a cf means you lose the team’s best close-and-late pinch runner.

  121. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 9:21 pm

    114 – because Reed is a promising young talent you want to give every cahnce to develop and Bloomquist is a replacement level player you gain almost nothing by giving more playing time? In fact, you hurt yourself by taking your only reserve infielder off the bench.

    And because, as I said, Reed’s floor is about level with Bloomquist’s ceiling.

  122. bpdawg24 on April 26th, 2006 9:22 pm

    Very nice W and series win over arguably the hottest team in the land.

  123. Rick L on April 26th, 2006 9:23 pm

    It would be nice to have another reserve infielder so Reed could substitute for WFB in situations like the 9th. Even though Willie has a decent fielding percentage in CF, it is a lot different to play the outfield than the infield.

  124. John in L.A. on April 26th, 2006 9:23 pm

    122 – indeed.

  125. LB on April 26th, 2006 9:24 pm

    So, if you beat the World Champs 2 out of 3, that make you the World Champs. Right? That’s what I’m getting from the FSNW guys, anyway.

  126. mfaninpa on April 26th, 2006 9:25 pm

    82 – LOB% AL league average is 70%
    NL league average is 71%

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/teams/

  127. JoeM on April 26th, 2006 9:32 pm

    121, granted Reed should have more upside in the long run and should be the regular CF. He also should have been on the bench if WFB hits .500 against their starter and Reed hits .200 against lefties. Now if the next lefty owns bloomquist and reed equally (or even by .100 points) then fine give Reed a chance to hit. But if WFB continues to steal bases, hit with runners in scoring position and Reed doesn’t, it makes it hard to convince Hargove (moron that he is) to keep sending Reed up there.

    That being said, all the M’s suckfest hitters are looking better the last 6-9 games despite the record of the team. Reed might be next to catch fire.

  128. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 9:33 pm

    82 – LOB% AL league average is 70%
    NL league average is 71%

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/teams/

    Thanks, I totally missed that…

  129. Rain Delay on April 26th, 2006 9:33 pm

    So with that said, Washburn is right around the AL average..

  130. dan on April 26th, 2006 9:46 pm

    #127 i had that mindset last year. it’s a bit harder this year when there are enough guys hitting well in the lineup that we shouldn’t be sacraficing playing time for players (reed) just to give a bench guy who is doing well more playing time.

    but that’s just me.

  131. msb on April 26th, 2006 9:57 pm

    so, off to Baltimore & the Twins, right?

    I’m off to bed with my friend Mr Vicodin. Good luck with your pal, John.

  132. JoeM on April 26th, 2006 10:01 pm

    See last year I would have kept willie benched except late in games. I would have guessed Reed would have a huge year then this year he’d sophmore slump as there was more footage of him.

  133. BelaXadux on April 26th, 2006 10:11 pm

    Wudjabuhleeevit?? Just when Ye Old Home Nine look as though they’re about to sink away in an unlovely dissolve like a third-grade wedding cake in a hot station wagon, they put on a professional performance for a full nine innings to get a W?? Well, wunderbar! (Only one to a customer, though.)

    Lopez is a difference-maker on this roster, fersure, fersure. If J-Rod keeps throwing games like that, he’ll be someone he hasn’t been before: consistent. He’s had stretches of effectivness in his career—and wipe-out bad years, too. I’m waiting until June before I commit to a position on the man, but I’m almost willing to go to the park to watch him pitch, now.

  134. JI on April 26th, 2006 10:14 pm

    M’s win (Buerhle no less), Hendu is nowhere to be found- I must be dreaming.

    So at what point does Boom-Boom give Beltre a night off?

  135. BelaXadux on April 26th, 2006 10:23 pm

    Re: Reed or Willie out there in CF, this is the third time this year Willie has dived for a line shot; the first two he flat missed for XB RBI hits. There’s a good chance that Reed, with good jumps and good routes, doesn’t even leave his feet to make this catch. That’s the difference.

    Putting Willie in the lineup tonight to get the match-up is exactly what a manager is supposed to do. I don’t care for Bloomers either, but it’s simple spite to fault Grover for playing a guy with better stats when his team needs a win. One can fault him easily, however, for not making the defensive substitution in the 8th. Decent managers spot a match-up and use it; good managers spot _every_ match-up and make the optimal change, inning by inning.

  136. Goose on April 26th, 2006 10:24 pm

    125.

    To be the man, WOOOOOO, you got to beat the man!

  137. Bruce on April 26th, 2006 10:46 pm

    “Spite” isn’t why I’d fault Grover for playing WFB over Reed. Instead, it’s because I believe that:

    WFB’s advantage against Buehrle is ephemeral.

    WFB is a clear defensive downgrade in CF compared to Reed. (To your examples of missed dives, I’d add the double that he turned into a triple this week by misplaying the bounce off the wall.)

    Grover’s pattern of sitting Reed against lefties is preventing his development against same.

  138. G-Man on April 26th, 2006 11:27 pm

    I’d say use the excuse of Willie’s previous success against Buehle to play him in place of Beltre or Sexson tonight.

    I agree that the fawning over Willie is overdone, but there is sure a lot of other undeserved platitudes said about other players, too.

  139. Harold on April 26th, 2006 11:46 pm

    Well as long as the M’s are 3.5 games out of the AL West (or is it waste?) lead then were likely to see the duties in CF split between The Ignitor and Reed. Just don’t call it Platooning. It’s “Sharing”.

  140. John in L.A. on April 27th, 2006 12:13 am

    138 – Who?

    Assuming we are talking about mariners, which is all I really care about, I can’t think of anyone who comes close to the level of undeserved fawning of Bloomquist. I’d say that a distant second is Guardado, but even he gets called out once in a while. They’ve never really over-fawned, on Betancourt or Lopez. They’ve been pretty hard on Lopez, actually. They’ve never fallen over themselves praising Reed. All of those young guys they talk a lot about what they need to learn, even when they are outperforming everyone else.

    Betancourt gets a lot of glove praise, but that’s hardly undeserved.

    2003-2004 Bret Boone, maybe gets about halfway to Willie on the undeserved platitudes scale – and at least in his case at one point he had been worthy of the fawning.

    Two days ago Betancourt has a real big moment in a young guy’s career – he drove in a run in the bottom of the ninth to win the game… and all anyone wanted to talk about was how awesome Willie Bloomquist was to steal that base.

    137 – my sentiments exactly.

    Mariners management has really backed themselves into a corner with Willie. For years they’ve oversold him… and now they have to justify finding playing time for him to appease the masses.

    And at this point it is irrelevant how good a utility guy he is, because the Mariners largely refuse to use him as such.

  141. msb on April 27th, 2006 11:51 am

    just curious, how has M’s management ‘oversold’ Bloomquist?

  142. Steve T on April 27th, 2006 1:20 pm

    Bret Boone in 2003 was a legitimate MVP candidate, and in 2004 was still one of the best players on the Mariners. Willie has never been within a country mile of either of those conditions.

  143. eponymous coward on April 27th, 2006 2:38 pm

    in 2004 was still one of the best players on the Mariners.

    Whaaa?

    Bret Boone, 2004: .251/.317/.423

    TEAM stats for 2004 Mariners: .270 BA (6th), .331 OBP (10th), .399 SLG (14th)

    His defense was nothing to write home about in 2004, either. In 2004, Bret Boone was just bad, as opposed to 2005 being truly awful.

  144. John in L.A. on April 27th, 2006 2:57 pm

    Steve T – Ooops. I meant 2004-2005, sorry.

    msb – announcers/press/interviews… they sold the local scrappy guy angle hard and it worked too well, fans like him way out of proportion to his value.

  145. msb on April 27th, 2006 5:14 pm

    not management then, but the local media (who just love that he is a very honest interview, and more esp. a very easy story for them) and the hired broadcasters (who prob. fall into the exact same catagory) …. I sure couldn’t recall anyone on the management side making a point of talking him up as the 2nd baseman of the future (they have always gone out and gotten someone else to play his positions) or as anyone other than a local guy they like….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.