<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M&#8217;s make a trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BelaXadux</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-120369</link>
		<dc:creator>BelaXadux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-120369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m _incredibly_disappointed to hear that they traded Cabrera . . . for _that._  He was blocked, and they probabaly were going to move Asdrubal, but this price is ridiculous.  It&#039;s too soon to be sure of his bat, but Cabrera is going to be a regular at the big league level, and quite possibly an outstanding one.  To me, this deal has the potential to be a Varitek &gt; Slocumb transaction, in a very similar context.  

The Ms want to &#039;do something&#039; for credibility, and so they burn a prospect of real ability for a fizzle of media sizzle.  The Ms had all of last offseason to fill the DH slot.  They bungled it, so now in season they have to make a much too expensive move to cover the hole.  Simple ineptitude.  This is a total rob job by Cleveland, I can&#039;t credit Shapiro enough for picking the lock box of a dumbass, behind-the-curve organization.  

I go away on vacation, and THIS happens.  *yechhh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m _incredibly_disappointed to hear that they traded Cabrera . . . for _that._  He was blocked, and they probabaly were going to move Asdrubal, but this price is ridiculous.  It&#8217;s too soon to be sure of his bat, but Cabrera is going to be a regular at the big league level, and quite possibly an outstanding one.  To me, this deal has the potential to be a Varitek &gt; Slocumb transaction, in a very similar context.  </p>
<p>The Ms want to &#8216;do something&#8217; for credibility, and so they burn a prospect of real ability for a fizzle of media sizzle.  The Ms had all of last offseason to fill the DH slot.  They bungled it, so now in season they have to make a much too expensive move to cover the hole.  Simple ineptitude.  This is a total rob job by Cleveland, I can&#8217;t credit Shapiro enough for picking the lock box of a dumbass, behind-the-curve organization.  </p>
<p>I go away on vacation, and THIS happens.  *yechhh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-120358</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 07:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-120358</guid>
		<description>I was hoping to get 100 AB out of Perez. After tonight&#039;s blasphemous 8th inning with Everett and Reed(!) swinging away against lefties, I&#039;m not too sure.

Perez is supposed to be here to hit lefties, but even if the Rox had popped in a righty out of the bullpen, he would have still been a better option than Everett and Reed are against lefties.

Hopefully it&#039;s just a &quot;day to get acquainted&quot; type of case. As much as it was to pay, if they only end up getting Petagine opportunities out of him (25 AB through 82 games), the cost would &lt;i&gt;relatively&lt;/i&gt; become absurd.

That said, I don&#039;t expect it would be anywhere near that low, because Peta&#039;s stuck at the same side of the dish as Everett&#039;s not-as-bad side is. With 80 games left, what if it ended up being around 80 AB? How much of a waste is &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;?

All I can say is, let&#039;s hope he regularly starts against lefties instead of Everett. Maybe good (or even mediocre) things will happen, and he&#039;ll get ~120, which would be just that many less for Everett.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping to get 100 AB out of Perez. After tonight&#8217;s blasphemous 8th inning with Everett and Reed(!) swinging away against lefties, I&#8217;m not too sure.</p>
<p>Perez is supposed to be here to hit lefties, but even if the Rox had popped in a righty out of the bullpen, he would have still been a better option than Everett and Reed are against lefties.</p>
<p>Hopefully it&#8217;s just a &#8220;day to get acquainted&#8221; type of case. As much as it was to pay, if they only end up getting Petagine opportunities out of him (25 AB through 82 games), the cost would <i>relatively</i> become absurd.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t expect it would be anywhere near that low, because Peta&#8217;s stuck at the same side of the dish as Everett&#8217;s not-as-bad side is. With 80 games left, what if it ended up being around 80 AB? How much of a waste is <i>that</i>?</p>
<p>All I can say is, let&#8217;s hope he regularly starts against lefties instead of Everett. Maybe good (or even mediocre) things will happen, and he&#8217;ll get ~120, which would be just that many less for Everett.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119900</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 01:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119900</guid>
		<description>According to PECOTA, Antonio Perez is Asdrubal Cabrera&#039;s third most comparable player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to PECOTA, Antonio Perez is Asdrubal Cabrera&#8217;s third most comparable player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119885</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119885</guid>
		<description>160. Equating Antonio Perez to Cabrera is silly.  Perez never had the glove of Cabrera was already in decline as a prospect when the M&#039;s traded him.

Let&#039;s watch this one but the trade has all the signs of looking very bad 3 yrs from now...strikingly similar to the Varitek deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>160. Equating Antonio Perez to Cabrera is silly.  Perez never had the glove of Cabrera was already in decline as a prospect when the M&#8217;s traded him.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s watch this one but the trade has all the signs of looking very bad 3 yrs from now&#8230;strikingly similar to the Varitek deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK1984</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119884</link>
		<dc:creator>AK1984</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119884</guid>
		<description>With regards to improving the Seattle Mariners, does anyone on here think that starting pitcher Brade Radke (5.11 ERA; 1.57 WHIP; 53 to 24 K:BB ratio; $9,000,000 salary) and center fielder Torii Hunter (.265 AVG; .342 OBP; .439 SLG; $10,750,000 salary) could help the team?

If so, then do y&#039;all think that a trade wherein the M&#039;s sent starting pitcher Joel PiÃ±eiro, relief pitcher Eddie Guardado, center fielder Jeremy Reed, and designated hitter Carl Everett to the Minnesota Twins for Radke and Hunter would improve the ballclub?

The following are four reasons about why the Twins would make the deal:

1. PiÃ±eiro, unlike Radke, is under club control through 2007.
2. The Twins lack a left-handed setup man like Guardado.
3. Reed is cheap and has a lot of potential.
4. Everett is better than Ruben Sierra and Rondell White.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to improving the Seattle Mariners, does anyone on here think that starting pitcher Brade Radke (5.11 ERA; 1.57 WHIP; 53 to 24 K:BB ratio; $9,000,000 salary) and center fielder Torii Hunter (.265 AVG; .342 OBP; .439 SLG; $10,750,000 salary) could help the team?</p>
<p>If so, then do y&#8217;all think that a trade wherein the M&#8217;s sent starting pitcher Joel PiÃ±eiro, relief pitcher Eddie Guardado, center fielder Jeremy Reed, and designated hitter Carl Everett to the Minnesota Twins for Radke and Hunter would improve the ballclub?</p>
<p>The following are four reasons about why the Twins would make the deal:</p>
<p>1. PiÃ±eiro, unlike Radke, is under club control through 2007.<br />
2. The Twins lack a left-handed setup man like Guardado.<br />
3. Reed is cheap and has a lot of potential.<br />
4. Everett is better than Ruben Sierra and Rondell White.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119883</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119883</guid>
		<description>#161: You can find commentary written with pom-poms on by googling for &quot;Mariner Optimist.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#161: You can find commentary written with pom-poms on by googling for &#8220;Mariner Optimist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119870</link>
		<dc:creator>John in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 19:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119870</guid>
		<description>161 - 

Saying &quot;Nice pick-up, but we paid too much.&quot; is overreacting?

Saying &quot;Perez is great, but Cabrera is a greater one.&quot; is &quot;analyzing to the point of paralysis?&quot;

There is a lot of good discussion in this thread, a lot of good analysis - which, by the by, is why most of us come here... not to do the Wave and talk about Hargrove&#039;s favorite cookie recipe.

&quot;Just be a fan.&quot;

Sometimes I hate the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>161 &#8211; </p>
<p>Saying &#8220;Nice pick-up, but we paid too much.&#8221; is overreacting?</p>
<p>Saying &#8220;Perez is great, but Cabrera is a greater one.&#8221; is &#8220;analyzing to the point of paralysis?&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a lot of good discussion in this thread, a lot of good analysis &#8211; which, by the by, is why most of us come here&#8230; not to do the Wave and talk about Hargrove&#8217;s favorite cookie recipe.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just be a fan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes I hate the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119867</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119867</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Some of you guys need to stop analyzing everything to the point of paralysis and just try being a fan for a few days. &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t be jerk, that&#039;s uncalled for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Some of you guys need to stop analyzing everything to the point of paralysis and just try being a fan for a few days. </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be jerk, that&#8217;s uncalled for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tap House Dan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119866</link>
		<dc:creator>Tap House Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119866</guid>
		<description>Wow... a lot of you guys are REALLY overreacting to this deal.  Cabrera was never going to play a significant role with the M&#039;s... and in my mind this deal is a small piece of evidence that our minor league system is close to being the kind of asset for us that it is for more successful teams.  We moved an asset in an area we have a huge surplus, for a piece that might help us win this year beyond most of our expectations.  I have absolutely no problem with this move.  Cabrera was a nice player who played a position where we&#039;re loaded with nice players.

Some of you guys need to stop analyzing everything to the point of paralysis and just try being a fan for a few days.  The team is finally headed in the right direction, learning how to win with a nice mix of home-grown youth and veteran players, and the minor league system is improving every year to the point that we&#039;ll be able to tweak our major league roster when we need to by making moves like this every year without feeling like we&#039;re gutting our organization.  The light at the end of the tunnel seems a lot closer than it did 6 months ago.  Just enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; a lot of you guys are REALLY overreacting to this deal.  Cabrera was never going to play a significant role with the M&#8217;s&#8230; and in my mind this deal is a small piece of evidence that our minor league system is close to being the kind of asset for us that it is for more successful teams.  We moved an asset in an area we have a huge surplus, for a piece that might help us win this year beyond most of our expectations.  I have absolutely no problem with this move.  Cabrera was a nice player who played a position where we&#8217;re loaded with nice players.</p>
<p>Some of you guys need to stop analyzing everything to the point of paralysis and just try being a fan for a few days.  The team is finally headed in the right direction, learning how to win with a nice mix of home-grown youth and veteran players, and the minor league system is improving every year to the point that we&#8217;ll be able to tweak our major league roster when we need to by making moves like this every year without feeling like we&#8217;re gutting our organization.  The light at the end of the tunnel seems a lot closer than it did 6 months ago.  Just enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/comment-page-4/#comment-119865</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/06/30/oy/#comment-119865</guid>
		<description>Perez is going to play only against LHP.  His OPS this year against LHP 1.038, which is in line with his career splits.  In 785 career AB, Perez has hit .270/.366/.522 -- that&#039;s an OPS of .889.  That&#039;s the same OPS as the M&#039;s best hitter this year, Ibanez (.285/.357/.532/.889).  And against LHP, the only M&#039;s hitter in the lineup with an OPS over .800 is Ichiro at .916 (.375/.439/.477).  Perez is nowhere near replacement value -- his VORP this year is 10.6 in only 99 AB.  

So the M&#039;s just upgraded their DH spot against LHP from Everett (.169/.258/.288 for an OPS of .546) to Perez (.889 career OPS, 1.038 2006 OPS).  That&#039;s huge.  We all like Doyle, but it&#039;s unrealistic to expect him to post a .900 OPS against LHP this year.

The M&#039;s overpaid, but let&#039;s not exaggerate it.  While Cabrera is a nice player and solid &quot;B&quot; prospect, the comparison to the Varitek/Lowe deal is just plain silly.  In terms of talent, this is the M&#039;s giving up Antonio Perez again.  Anyone miss him, much less remember him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perez is going to play only against LHP.  His OPS this year against LHP 1.038, which is in line with his career splits.  In 785 career AB, Perez has hit .270/.366/.522 &#8212; that&#8217;s an OPS of .889.  That&#8217;s the same OPS as the M&#8217;s best hitter this year, Ibanez (.285/.357/.532/.889).  And against LHP, the only M&#8217;s hitter in the lineup with an OPS over .800 is Ichiro at .916 (.375/.439/.477).  Perez is nowhere near replacement value &#8212; his VORP this year is 10.6 in only 99 AB.  </p>
<p>So the M&#8217;s just upgraded their DH spot against LHP from Everett (.169/.258/.288 for an OPS of .546) to Perez (.889 career OPS, 1.038 2006 OPS).  That&#8217;s huge.  We all like Doyle, but it&#8217;s unrealistic to expect him to post a .900 OPS against LHP this year.</p>
<p>The M&#8217;s overpaid, but let&#8217;s not exaggerate it.  While Cabrera is a nice player and solid &#8220;B&#8221; prospect, the comparison to the Varitek/Lowe deal is just plain silly.  In terms of talent, this is the M&#8217;s giving up Antonio Perez again.  Anyone miss him, much less remember him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
