<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun with numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BelaXadux</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128708</link>
		<dc:creator>BelaXadux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128708</guid>
		<description>Mat, thanks for the runner/non-runner splits on Beltre.  I&#039;d wondered on that issue, and the data puts it in perspective.  It would seem natural that he&#039;d hit better with guys on, but most of his deep hits and HRs that stand out for me in the last 7 weeks were with the bases empty, which his what the numbers say.  Hmmm. A Food for thought.  Oh, and Idahoinvader&#039;s perspective on Adrian not hitting with RISP jibes with this too, at least in principle.  

Adrian clearly presses.  He presses with guys on.  He presses trying to hit in Safeco.  He presses because he cares.  He presses because of the contract.  He presses because he&#039;s a flawed hitter and keeps trying to &#039;make things happen&#039; from behind in the count where he finds himself quite often.  I think he presses for some other reason&#039;s too, but I don&#039;t have any proof.  To me, there&#039;s a good chance that if he were traded to another team, his overall numbers would come up noticeably, though not to the moon, perhaps because he&#039;d take some of that pressure off himself and just react more at the plate.  That would tend to make moving him &#039;look bad&#039; in retrospect, but that&#039;s just the way it goes.  

I&#039;m totally NOT in favor of &#039;dumping&#039; Beltre, far less moving him to take back a bad contract.  He does some things well, is an outstanding defender, is a great teammate, and he has hit his way out of a catastrophic slump to disappointing but still useful numbers.  If and when he&#039;s dealt, it should be in a thoughtful deal which helps the team.  I certainly think that this could be accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mat, thanks for the runner/non-runner splits on Beltre.  I&#8217;d wondered on that issue, and the data puts it in perspective.  It would seem natural that he&#8217;d hit better with guys on, but most of his deep hits and HRs that stand out for me in the last 7 weeks were with the bases empty, which his what the numbers say.  Hmmm. A Food for thought.  Oh, and Idahoinvader&#8217;s perspective on Adrian not hitting with RISP jibes with this too, at least in principle.  </p>
<p>Adrian clearly presses.  He presses with guys on.  He presses trying to hit in Safeco.  He presses because he cares.  He presses because of the contract.  He presses because he&#8217;s a flawed hitter and keeps trying to &#8216;make things happen&#8217; from behind in the count where he finds himself quite often.  I think he presses for some other reason&#8217;s too, but I don&#8217;t have any proof.  To me, there&#8217;s a good chance that if he were traded to another team, his overall numbers would come up noticeably, though not to the moon, perhaps because he&#8217;d take some of that pressure off himself and just react more at the plate.  That would tend to make moving him &#8216;look bad&#8217; in retrospect, but that&#8217;s just the way it goes.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m totally NOT in favor of &#8216;dumping&#8217; Beltre, far less moving him to take back a bad contract.  He does some things well, is an outstanding defender, is a great teammate, and he has hit his way out of a catastrophic slump to disappointing but still useful numbers.  If and when he&#8217;s dealt, it should be in a thoughtful deal which helps the team.  I certainly think that this could be accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128334</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128334</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; The only problem with that is that with Lopez in the 2 slot it was Bunt-o-Rama. &lt;/i&gt;

That, in itself, may be a reason to keep Beltre at the 2 slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> The only problem with that is that with Lopez in the 2 slot it was Bunt-o-Rama. </i></p>
<p>That, in itself, may be a reason to keep Beltre at the 2 slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Malph</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Malph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128333</guid>
		<description>Ideally, if Beltre keeps hitting, I&#039;d like to see him batting 3 and Lopez 2.  Lopez doesn&#039;t seem to have responded well to moving to #3.  The only problem with that is that with Lopez in the 2 slot it was Bunt-o-Rama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, if Beltre keeps hitting, I&#8217;d like to see him batting 3 and Lopez 2.  Lopez doesn&#8217;t seem to have responded well to moving to #3.  The only problem with that is that with Lopez in the 2 slot it was Bunt-o-Rama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Clapper</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128332</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Clapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128332</guid>
		<description>159: Especially when considering, as Dave pointed out, that taking ballpark effect into account, AB&#039;s productivity may well be the best of any 3B in the West this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>159: Especially when considering, as Dave pointed out, that taking ballpark effect into account, AB&#8217;s productivity may well be the best of any 3B in the West this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128331</link>
		<dc:creator>John in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128331</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, I can think of people whoâ€™d object to the latter.&quot;

Heh. Me too. But I probably used bad numbers, anyway. Let me rephrase it to say the M&#039;s can afford to overpay an awesome defense, .775-.825 OPS, third baseman.

Because even with SafeCo, I think Beltre is an around .800 OPS guy. Heck, I think he finishes THIS season on the right half of the .700&#039;s, .770 - .790 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, I can think of people whoâ€™d object to the latter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heh. Me too. But I probably used bad numbers, anyway. Let me rephrase it to say the M&#8217;s can afford to overpay an awesome defense, .775-.825 OPS, third baseman.</p>
<p>Because even with SafeCo, I think Beltre is an around .800 OPS guy. Heck, I think he finishes THIS season on the right half of the .700&#8217;s, .770 &#8211; .790 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Malph</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Malph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128330</guid>
		<description>The advantage for Beltre of moving to #2 isn&#039;t just having Ichiro on base.  It&#039;s also having Ibanez behind him instead of C-Rex.  Or Reed.  That might get him some better pitches even with the bases empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advantage for Beltre of moving to #2 isn&#8217;t just having Ichiro on base.  It&#8217;s also having Ibanez behind him instead of C-Rex.  Or Reed.  That might get him some better pitches even with the bases empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128329</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128329</guid>
		<description>I have just one word for them DEEEEEEEEache.... :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just one word for them DEEEEEEEEache&#8230;. <img src='http://ussmariner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128328</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128328</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Having said that, the way some posters here skewer Manny Ramirez for his defense, I would just to see how this crowd would take to Wily Moâ€™s. &lt;/i&gt;

With great glee and sharpened knives.

But there&#039;d be folks defending that bat....and THAT would be the fun part, when there&#039;s ammunition on both sides...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Having said that, the way some posters here skewer Manny Ramirez for his defense, I would just to see how this crowd would take to Wily Moâ€™s. </i></p>
<p>With great glee and sharpened knives.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;d be folks defending that bat&#8230;.and THAT would be the fun part, when there&#8217;s ammunition on both sides&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128327</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128327</guid>
		<description>#158: &lt;i&gt;That being said, Wily Mo Pena would absolutely brutalize Safecoâ€¦ so what if he only hits it 420 feet instead of 500 feet there? &lt;/i&gt;

Wily Mo would brutalize the Grand Canyon (if it were a ballpark).

Having said that, the way some posters here skewer Manny Ramirez for his defense, I would just to see how this crowd would take to Wily Mo&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#158: <i>That being said, Wily Mo Pena would absolutely brutalize Safecoâ€¦ so what if he only hits it 420 feet instead of 500 feet there? </i></p>
<p>Wily Mo would brutalize the Grand Canyon (if it were a ballpark).</p>
<p>Having said that, the way some posters here skewer Manny Ramirez for his defense, I would just to see how this crowd would take to Wily Mo&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-4/#comment-128326</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/07/23/fun-with-numbers/#comment-128326</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; 156 - I agree that, in my opinion, those two changes would help us more than anything else. And the DH one is SO easy, itâ€™s maddening.

As I keep saying, the Mâ€™s can afford, both financially and roster-wise, to overpay a defensive whiz at third with a .725-.800 OPS. &lt;/i&gt;

Well, I can think of people who&#039;d object to the latter.

But all the OTHER stuff really is maddening. Keeping C-Rex on the team? Stupid. Trotting Mateo out for so many innings? Madness. Overusing Bloomquist? Idiotic. Letting your bench rot? Mind boggling. Not using Perez in key situations? Stupefying. 

All that stuff really pushes Beltre and his production waayyyy down the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> 156 &#8211; I agree that, in my opinion, those two changes would help us more than anything else. And the DH one is SO easy, itâ€™s maddening.</p>
<p>As I keep saying, the Mâ€™s can afford, both financially and roster-wise, to overpay a defensive whiz at third with a .725-.800 OPS. </i></p>
<p>Well, I can think of people who&#8217;d object to the latter.</p>
<p>But all the OTHER stuff really is maddening. Keeping C-Rex on the team? Stupid. Trotting Mateo out for so many innings? Madness. Overusing Bloomquist? Idiotic. Letting your bench rot? Mind boggling. Not using Perez in key situations? Stupefying. </p>
<p>All that stuff really pushes Beltre and his production waayyyy down the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
