Game 112, Devil Rays at Mariners

Dave · August 8, 2006 at 6:21 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

Happy Felix Day.

Hernandez vs Seo, 7:05 pm.

Seo has iffy stuff and throws strikes. He’s Tampa’s Joe Blanton, basically. Hopefully the M’s can treat him like the rest of the league treats Blanton, and not like we treat Blanton.

Also, bad news; Mark Lowe is battling some elbow soreness, and though I heard he was available tonight, John Hickey is reporting that he won’t pitch in this series. The M’s are being cautious with their young arms, which we like, but you still never like to hear that the arms we love are anything less than 100 percent healthy.

Here’s the line-up:

1. Ichiro, RF
2. Lopez, 2B
3. Beltre, 3B
4. Ibanez, LF
5. Sexson, 1B
6. Broussard, DH
7. Johjima, C
8. Betancourt, SS
9. Empty, CF

Adam Jones has 7 at-bats in August. Glad to see that part of the development strategy, after crushing his confidence with a premature callup, is to let him sit on the bench and not play. Well done, Grover.

Comments

269 Responses to “Game 112, Devil Rays at Mariners”

  1. Dave on August 8th, 2006 6:27 pm

    Didn’t want to rip on Willie in another thread, since some people think we do that enough, but I have to point this out. Jae Seo is right handed. Willie’s season line against righties: .207/.287/.220.

    That’s a .507 OPS, which is awful, and he’s not a good center fielder.

    Ugh.

  2. VaBeachMarinersFan on August 8th, 2006 6:27 pm

    Hopefully Lowe will be ok.

    If we sent Jones down to get some AB’s who would we call up to replace him? Any ideas?

  3. Ralph Malph on August 8th, 2006 6:27 pm

    At least we’ll get to see Hargrove practice the NL style of management with WFB in the 9th spot. Maybe we’ll see a bunch of double switches tonight.

  4. Dave on August 8th, 2006 6:28 pm

    If we sent Jones down to get some AB’s who would we call up to replace him? Any ideas?

    Just sign Jose Cruz in a couple of days when the Dodgers release him.

  5. Ralph Malph on August 8th, 2006 6:28 pm

    Jones hit righthanders quite well in Tacoma, FWIW. No one told Hargrove, though.

  6. Rain Delay on August 8th, 2006 6:29 pm

    Lets add to the fact Putz has 60 pitches in 2 days and more than likely wont be used tonight…

  7. Rain Delay on August 8th, 2006 6:31 pm

    Just sign Jose Cruz in a couple of days when the Dodgers release him.

    Thats the first thing I thought when I saw the Dodgers DFA him.

  8. mike on August 8th, 2006 6:39 pm

    and jones hit .125 vs LHP in Tacoma

  9. skankin pickle on August 8th, 2006 6:39 pm

    9. Empty, CF

    Brilliant!

  10. Free Dan Rohn! on August 8th, 2006 6:40 pm

    I’d be happy with Jose Cruz on the roster.

    Well, not happy. Happier.

  11. Hooligan on August 8th, 2006 6:42 pm

    This can’t help my plea for Lowe to be moved to either the M’s or Rainiers’ rotation next year. And does anyone have any evidence that the organization won’t give that a try?

  12. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 6:49 pm

    “9. Empty, CF”

    I love it.

    “Adam Jones has 7 at-bats in August. Glad to see that part of the development strategy, after crushing his confidence with a premature callup, is to let him sit on the bench and not play. Well done, Grover.”

    For real. Figures he’d find a way to make a bad idea worse.

    I haven’t let completely lost the joy cutting Everett brought me… but, my god, they are trying.

  13. revbill on August 8th, 2006 6:54 pm

    Hey, at least Empty’s batting ninth, and not second. I realize that this is because he’s replacing the number nine hitter, but I’ll take what I can get.

  14. Rain Delay on August 8th, 2006 6:56 pm

    Grover’s excuse for starting Willy..”We need to get Willy some at bats..”

    Ugh.

  15. Jeff Nye on August 8th, 2006 7:00 pm

    Grover’s attempt at “explaining” why he was starting Bloomquist made no sense.

    The two key points:

    1) “We need to keep Willie sharp”: He’s not sharp, never has been, and what’s the benefit of keeping a mediocre player sharp anyway? It’s like sharpening a plastic spork (actually, a spork isn’t a bad analogy for Willie; he’s something you should only use if no better options are available)

    2) “Adam Jones has things he needs to work on”: His bench-sitting skills? He’s got to have an opportunity to PLAY in order to figure out whatever it is that he needs to figure out.

    Willie getting playing time he doesn’t deserve isn’t so much the big deal, especially as the M’s playoff chances fade; but having Adam Jones wasting valuable development time sitting unused on the bench is /inexcusable/.

  16. msb on August 8th, 2006 7:00 pm

    #14– I was just about to pass that gem along. sheesh. Still utilizing that ‘give ‘em at-bat’ theory that worked so well with Carl, huh.

  17. dan on August 8th, 2006 7:02 pm

    Is it just me, or shouldn’t we have traded for a CF with an OPS over .700 rather than getting another 2 people who can only play 1B/DH?

    Seriously. This team has some sort of hardon for people who can/should only play 1B/DH.

  18. Rain Delay on August 8th, 2006 7:02 pm

    16- No kidding. Grover’s been using that line since he started to Platoon WFB and Reed..

    Common’ Grover. Mix it up a little at least.

  19. Jeff Nye on August 8th, 2006 7:05 pm

    Because DH was an enormous sucking hole, and bringing in an “established veteran” was the only way they were going to get Hargrove to stop writing Everett’s name on the lineup card?

  20. Rain Delay on August 8th, 2006 7:05 pm

    Jones isn’t going to learn to hit Major League pitching from the bench. They called up and should at least use him or send him back to Tacoma and let him play every day.

  21. dan on August 8th, 2006 7:07 pm

    #19 they brought in 2 established veterans, making 4 people (sexson, broussard, perez, dobbs) who can only play 1b/dh. so basically they made two trades so they can replace one person, and in the process they did not improve CF at all.

  22. scraps on August 8th, 2006 7:10 pm

    The improved the DH position hugely. Crikey, you think they should solve every problem simultaneously?

  23. Jeff Nye on August 8th, 2006 7:11 pm

    21: Dobby the Bench Elf can’t really play ANYTHING. So he doesn’t really count.

    The Broussard/Perez platoon, like one of the USSM authors posted, turns a hugely weak position into a big strength, and Richie Sexson is fine where he is for now.

    Plus, to get help in CF, they would’ve had to have given up talent and paid more for someone who’s going to be blocking Adam Jones when he’s ready (if he ever makes it off the bench).

    They still may very well be able to find someone interesting on the waiver wire, too.

  24. scraps on August 8th, 2006 7:12 pm

    Also, Greg Dobbs plays third base and left field, so does not belong on your list of guys who can only play first.

  25. Dave on August 8th, 2006 7:12 pm

    Good to see Felix down in the strike zone that whole inning. He didn’t throw one pitch up. That was Good Felix, even with the HBP and the double. Cantu just hit a good pitch.

  26. Hawaiian Mariner on August 8th, 2006 7:13 pm

    Adding first base options at realativly low cost also gives the Mariners some flexibility as far as trading off Sexon and his contract to free space for Starting pitching this off season.

  27. dw on August 8th, 2006 7:22 pm

    The M’s could just give one lucky fan the chance to play center and hit ninth.

    Wouldn’t be that much worse than what’s been run out there this year already.

  28. David* on August 8th, 2006 7:23 pm

    And more people would show up.

    I like watching Felix pitch.*

    *truth

  29. msb on August 8th, 2006 7:24 pm

    #17– so, lessee, CF, an OPS of over .700 in a reasonable number of games, say 85+ … um, V. Wells, G. Sizemore, A. Jones, G. Matthews, M. Bradley, J. Damon, J. Edmonds, C. Granderson, K. Griffey, A. Rowand, C. Patterson, B. Clark, S. Finley, R. Freel, G. Gross,
    D. DeJesus, J. DaVanon, M. Cameron, T. Hunter, R. Mackowiak…

  30. Dave on August 8th, 2006 7:24 pm

    Good Felix is in the house. Diving sinkers, everything down in the zone, repeating his delivery better than normal, throwing strikes.

    Tampa’s an impatient club, and Felix looks like he brought his A game tonight. This could be fun.

  31. dw on August 8th, 2006 7:25 pm

    Oh dear God. I’m only five or six years away from bands I listened to in junior high appearing at the Emerald Queen.

    Oh wait, they’ve had Night Ranger already this year.

  32. mln on August 8th, 2006 7:25 pm

    re: 27

    That’s a great idea for a promotion. I’d like to see some team that was out of the playoff chase do that for a game. Just to see that lucky fan play the outfield would be worth the price of admission.

  33. chris23 on August 8th, 2006 7:28 pm

    That was a fat pitch left up by Seo.

  34. msb on August 8th, 2006 7:30 pm

    oh, Raul reminds me– he was on KJR this aft. and said some very familiar things about Oakland’s good approach at the plate, and that they could have shown the same patience. um, yup.

  35. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 7:33 pm

    Nothing like that special feeling of having two on and NO ONE out and ending the inning without either runner moving up at all.

  36. argh on August 8th, 2006 7:38 pm

    I’m hoping that Ben Broussard is just having a little hiccup — his first seven games with the Ms he’s 3/18 and one walk which is kinda not what he was doing with Cleveland. Teeny-tiny sample but not what I was hoping for with Ichiro having a dry spell.

  37. awolfgang on August 8th, 2006 7:39 pm

    Ouch, Kenji is a trooper

  38. msb on August 8th, 2006 7:41 pm

    ok, Dave, next time Good Felix starts a game, you aren’t allowed to mention it.

  39. dw on August 8th, 2006 7:41 pm

    Why did I move away from Oklahoma the first chance I got? It’s as hot as it will be in Arlington this weekend two months straight.

  40. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 7:42 pm

    Branyan singles and then stole third…

    Wow! Just wanted to see what that phrase looked like

  41. Dave on August 8th, 2006 7:44 pm

    Earned Run, Johjima.

    He is having a pretty lousy inning.

  42. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 7:49 pm

    Has Willie been giving Ichiro batting tips?

  43. Josh on August 8th, 2006 7:55 pm

    Hey, I didn’t know empty spots in the lineup could strike out!

  44. argh on August 8th, 2006 8:05 pm

    “For cryin’ out loud,” indeed.

  45. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:05 pm

    Another note, there are two reasons why I humbly prefer ISO+OBP over OPS:

    1. It’s a more accurate measure instead of overly(doubly)-benefitting for base hits. Of course, there’s always the debate that if you do that, you should also deduct for DPs, add for SBs, et al. Just talking about one stat v. another here, though.

    2. It removes allows us to see the emphasis of how good the best hitters are in comparison to the good hitters, and how horrible the worst hitters (Hi Willie!) are in comparison to the scrubs. OPS, by doubly-crediting for hits masks the inferiority of the worst hitters by making numbers appear closer (ratio-wise), and likewise does well to hide the ratio that the best hitters are above those closest to them.

  46. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:06 pm

    Yankees just blew a ninth inning lead

  47. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:08 pm

    I’d say I was pretty sure that the commissioner would quash any “fan-player” type promotion, but given the current commissioner, who the hell knows.

  48. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:12 pm

    ISO + OBP has the effect of making singles equal walks, which they do not.

    I doubt that ISO + OBP does a better job of corrolating to runs scored than OPS does.

  49. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:15 pm

    ISO + OBP has the effect of making singles equal walks, which they do not.

    I doubt that ISO + OBP does a better job of corrolating to runs scored than OPS does.

    Although you could rightly say that the point of hitting is to score runs, I was specifically looking at the batter’s effectiveness ‘in a vaccuum.’ I suppose nature still abhors such.

    Good point though.

  50. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:15 pm

    Is Seo really doing anything that difficult and impressive against us? Or is this just another garbage hitting display that we are growing more accustomed to lately?

    Nice effin’ one pitch out WillBlow…sigh

  51. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:16 pm

    To put it another way, OPS doesn’t “double count” base hits. Broadly, onbase gives an idea of how many runs a player ought to score, and slugging gives an idea of how many they ought to knock in, all other things being equal. A walk has very little power to knock in runs. A single has some power to knock in runs, so counts in both measures.

  52. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:18 pm

    To put it another way, OPS doesn’t “double count” base hits. Broadly, onbase gives an idea of how many runs a player ought to score, and slugging gives an idea of how many they ought to knock in, all other things being equal. A walk has very little power to knock in runs. A single has some power to knock in runs, so counts in both measures.

    Even if that is how one chooses to look at a batter, a single would not be doubly-effective compared to a walk. Just throwing out a random number here: it might be 1.7x effective.

  53. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:21 pm

    Sorry if I’m obsessing about this, but you’ve got it running through my head.

    In OPS, this is the value of the major offensive possibilities:

    walk: 1
    single: 2
    double: 3
    triple: 4
    home run: 5

    In ISO + OBP, it looks like this:

    walk: 1
    single: 1
    double: 2
    triple: 3
    home run: 4

    The first list seems intuitively right to me. Am I missing something? It’s true that onbase is somewhat more valuable than slugging, but I don’t think it’s so much more valuable that you want to remove batting average from the slugging side.

  54. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 8:22 pm

    50, I know that you are only asking rhetorically. However, you are channelling me. Why can’t they hit this guy?!

  55. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:23 pm

    I think a single is probably a lot closer to double the value of a walk than it is to equal the value of a walk. They are equal with no one on base, but as soon as you have men on, the value of a single increases, and if you have multiple men on, the value of a single increases a lot.

  56. Dave on August 8th, 2006 8:24 pm

    All the work done on the issue points to the best way to calculate it is (OBP*1.8)+SLG.

  57. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 8:24 pm

    Except a single is more often closer in value to a walk than it is to two walks.

    Neither is perfect, but ISO+OBP is an improvement, IMO.

  58. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 8:25 pm

    The formula for ISO is what?

  59. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:26 pm

    Thank you, Dave!

  60. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:28 pm

    So onbase is nearly twice as valuable as slugging?? I had not known that.

  61. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 8:31 pm

    Time for some of that timely Ibanez hitting.

  62. CSG on August 8th, 2006 8:31 pm

    Is everyone just choosing to ignore the game at this point? It’s probably for the better.

  63. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:33 pm

    I think a single is probably a lot closer to double the value of a walk than it is to equal the value of a walk. They are equal with no one on base, but as soon as you have men on, the value of a single increases, and if you have multiple men on, the value of a single increases a lot.

    Yes, a single is closer to the value of double a walk than equal to a walk if you look at it that way: the actual result of the play(s). I prefer to look purely at the batter himself, and his individual efforts, because I don’t feel the need to base my value of him upon a system that values more on results (or is an attempt to be closer to expected results) when I can simply look at him again, in the proverbial vaccuum.

    Look at it this way: Without those guys on in front of him, a walk by him is no worse for scoring runs than is a single.

    If looking at the larger scheme, you also need to take into consideration the effects on the pitcher, and I believe an average walk would return back value over a single in that department. I don’t have the stats but I’d like to see the average number of pitches in PAs ending in a walk, and the average number of pitches in PAs ending in a single. After that, not only do you accomplish wearing down the pitcher and likely worsening his effectiveness, but also, if you’re effective enough at it, you’ll end up causing more innings required to be pitched by worse pitchers (in general, not in every case).

    JMO, it’s possible to look at it one way or the other, though.

  64. awolfgang on August 8th, 2006 8:34 pm

    It’s amazing how often the Mariners make crappy pitchers look like CY Young candidates

  65. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:35 pm

    All the work done on the issue points to the best way to calculate it is (OBP*1.8)+SLG.

    Thanks for sharing that, Dave.

    Neither is perfect, but ISO+OBP is an improvement, IMO.

    That’s how I see it, John.

  66. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:36 pm

    At least Felix has been doing well enough tonight. Not much else happening.

  67. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:38 pm

    I guess ‘well enough’ is deteriorating. Would be nice if we had a little more ’stopping’ at backstop though.

  68. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Well, I confess I can’t see a lot of reason to look at the value of things other than “the actual results of the plays.” What is the point in looking at it in a “vacuum”, assuming that’s what you are doing, though I don’t think you make a very convincing case.

    To me it’s absolutely straightforward: if ISO + OPS is a better way to view players than OPS, then it should correlate better to runs scored; and if it did, I think we’d have heard that by now.

    ISO + OBP may tell you different things about a hitter than OPS does, but I can’t see any logical way in which it is a better measure of players (unless it correlates better to runs scored).

  69. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Also, all those “larger scheme” things you talk about, if they indeed need to be “taken into consideration”, will show up in runs scored.

  70. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Well, I confess I can’t see a lot of reason to look at the value of things other than “the actual results of the plays.” What is the point in looking at it in a “vacuum”, assuming that’s what you are doing, though I don’t think you make a very convincing case.

    I already explained my personal thoughts behind it, and the point in looking at it that way. Suffice it to say we disagree on it. :)

  71. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 8:43 pm

    It’s very simple in my mind:

    All-star caliber Venezuelan pitcher on M’s = no run support.

  72. argh on August 8th, 2006 8:45 pm

    He and Moyer can always get t-shirts: “I pitched a great game and all I got was this lousy t-shirt”.

  73. argh on August 8th, 2006 8:46 pm

    Well, that wasn’t the kind of bounce-back I was looking for from Broussard but it’s a start.

  74. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 8:46 pm

    best strikeout ever? We can call it B2K!

  75. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:47 pm

    Except a single is more often closer in value to a walk than it is to two walks.

    Yes, but it is also sometimes worth a lot more than a walk — say, with a runner on third — and is never worth less than a walk.

    Any measurement that makes walks and singles equivalent is fundamentally flawed, IMO.

  76. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:47 pm

    Its sorta funny that so many posts deal with how important a walk should be in the realm of things, when the M’s get about one per week.

  77. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:48 pm

    Sorry, Josh, I think and type slow, didn’t mean to be running the point into the ground.

  78. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 8:48 pm

    Wow — we were just Oakland lucky :)

  79. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 8:50 pm

    Fuck. We take Jo out for Jones and they let Willie bat?!?!

  80. Dave on August 8th, 2006 8:50 pm

    Jones pinch runs for Johjima, and hopefully he’ll stay in the game to play center, but we don’t pinch hit for Willie?

    Geez.

  81. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:50 pm

    Grover is awfully optimistic/delusional:

    We sacrifice the runner over to second and put a pinch runner in. All of which is followed by Willie taking his “rightful” place in the box…sigh

  82. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 8:50 pm

    Where’s Dobby! Perfect PH situation with Jones already going in to run.

    Too late.

  83. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 8:51 pm

    God I hate willie

  84. Dave on August 8th, 2006 8:51 pm

    Why would you pitch to Ichiro here? The IBB makes so much sense.

  85. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:51 pm

    Example #43,716 this year when literally EVERYONE but Grover sees something screwy with this “strategy.”

  86. Brian Thornton on August 8th, 2006 8:51 pm

    Fucking Bloomquist.

  87. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 8:51 pm

    Doesn’t Hargrove remember what happened in the 9th inning on Sunday?

  88. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 8:52 pm

    “Any measurement that makes walks and singles equivalent is fundamentally flawed, IMO.”

    As is any measurement that assumes it’s always twice as valuable.

    I don’t see how you can speak in absolutes, neither is accurate, it’s just whether you think it’s closer in value to a walk or two walks.

    Neither is “right”, just which one you think is closer. I think a walk is worth quite a bit more than half a single… you don’t, clearly.

  89. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 8:52 pm

    Ichiro cannot buy a break.

  90. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:52 pm

    I’ll bet he’s going to keep Willie in center.

  91. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 8:53 pm

    4 great minds think alike. Too bad that Grover wasn’t one of them.

    And the IBB made sense, too, but TB gets away with it.

  92. argh on August 8th, 2006 8:53 pm

    Doesn’t Hargrove remember what happened in the 9th inning on Sunday?

    Are you kidding? Grover can’t remember where his locker is.

  93. Sports on a Schtick on August 8th, 2006 8:53 pm

    So I’m “watching” the game on ESPN Gamecast. Someone please tell that “W. Bloomquist fouled out to catcher” looked more heroic than it read.

  94. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 8:53 pm

    Hargrove is an idiot. I keep hoping he won’t be, and he keeps disappointing me. I need to stop hoping.

  95. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 8:53 pm

    It’ll be Jones in center and Willie in at catcher. Hargrove is a genius!

  96. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 8:54 pm

    Ichiro has had a *tough* week.

  97. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:55 pm

    I’ll bet he’s going to keep Willie in center.

    Likely will. He’s shown time and time again that Willie can bat when the game is on the line, but Jones isn’t to be trusted from the 7th inning forward, when we all know rookies’ production mystically dips 37%.

  98. scraps on August 8th, 2006 8:55 pm

    Neither is “right”, just which one you think is closer.

    Right, and we can measure that. I’m happy to let correlation to runs scored stand as the answer to the question, whatever it says.

  99. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 8:56 pm

    TB clearly doesn’t work on their “run after a strikeout” play like Broussard and the M’s do.

  100. Brian Thornton on August 8th, 2006 8:56 pm

    Does anyone have Bloomquist’s numbers for the season handy?

    After this brilliant 7th inning, and bunting a short stop hitting over 300 for WFB, I think it’s time for another appearance by “Brian From Kent” on the post-game show. I can’t wait to hear Blowers and Glasgow try to defend this move.

  101. Typical Idiot Fan on August 8th, 2006 8:57 pm

    106 pitches for the King after Baldelli’s single…

  102. Josh on August 8th, 2006 8:57 pm

    Well Jones is getting great ML experience to develop as a baserunner!

  103. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 8:58 pm

    93: How about this: Willie hit a towering fly ball down the line in left, but the ball sliced foul, and before it cold reach the stands in foul territory, the catcher scaled the wall and nabbed it.

  104. Brian Thornton on August 8th, 2006 8:59 pm

    #97. BLOOMQUIST can be trusted when the game is on the line?

    WHAAAAAA?

    Did you see his “critical” at-bat in the 9th inning the other night?

    WHYWHYWHY do people insist on claiming this guy is anything other than a late inning pinch-runner? What will it take for people to begin to see him for what he is, as finally happened with C-Rex the other week?

  105. CSG on August 8th, 2006 8:59 pm

    Felix since June 1, including tonight through 7 innings: 73 IP, 7.15 K/9, 2.96 BB/9, 7.77 H/9, 0.74 HR/9. 3.08 ERA. What were Felix and Beltre doing in April and May? They’ve been all-stars since June.

  106. Sports on a Schtick on August 8th, 2006 8:59 pm

    103: You liar. Willie can’t hit the ball all the way out to left field…

  107. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:00 pm

    Did you see his “critical” at-bat in the 9th inning the other night?

    Which other night? ;)

  108. Brian Thornton on August 8th, 2006 9:01 pm

    107. The one where he made the final out.

    And don’t ask “Which final out?”

  109. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:01 pm

    :(

  110. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:04 pm

    My mind’s a little groggy right now, but didn’t he make the final out in a game at New York in July, and once during this homestand as well? I don’t remember which game in particular, as those memories are ones I quickly and haphazardly fling onto the backburner.

  111. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 9:04 pm

    100, I rarely listen to any of the postgame shows unless I’m travelling home from Safeco, but I might do it if the lose this one, in the hopes of hearing the answer to that one.

  112. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:04 pm

    Well, If I robbed Ichiro I wouldn’t perceive anything else as a challenge either.

  113. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:05 pm

    104

    He SHOULD be used like they did Charles Gipson or even Ugeuto for all I care.

    Watch Grover try to have him bunt 3-0

  114. SoulofaCitizen on August 8th, 2006 9:06 pm

    I can’t believe that Hargrove managed to simultaneously take Jojima out of the lineup, and burn Adam Jones, and give up an out from Betencourt, one of our few recently hot hitter, only to lay it all on the line with Bloomquist at the plate. And ok Ichiro. But what a terrible strategy

  115. scraps on August 8th, 2006 9:06 pm

    So, is there a reason the Mariners can’t hit guys with middling stuff who throw strikes? Shouldn’t that be right up our alley?

  116. jefffrane on August 8th, 2006 9:06 pm

    Aaaaaa! “Injury delay” on Gameday.

    Not Beltre! Please!

  117. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:07 pm

    115

    Maybe it has to do with all being connected to Banner Bank

    (Seriously, in response to your question…you’d sure friggin’ think so)

  118. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:10 pm

    We’ve gotta be right up there among the team leaders in pathetic 3 pitch strikeouts

  119. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:11 pm

    Where are the announcers with the ‘Whenever the M’s need a clutch hit Raul gets one’ line?

  120. Dave on August 8th, 2006 9:11 pm

    If ever there was a time to lay down a sac bunt, it was with Ibanez up there against a lefty and two runners on with no out.

    But good old Bunt Machine Hargrove lets him swing away. Awful.

  121. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:11 pm

    ouch

  122. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:13 pm

    114

    I concur like the earth orbits the sun

  123. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:14 pm

    120

    Sorry, we only sacrifice with .300 hitters with Willie on deck…apparently

    Ugh…don’t tell me this is the 1,015th time we have two on and no outs and fail to move the runners AT ALL.

  124. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 9:15 pm

    All we need is for Ben to duplicate his K-double and we score…

  125. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:17 pm

    Ugly…and we didn’t even waste one of Willie’s ABs amongst those outs.

  126. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:17 pm

    oh damn we did it again!

  127. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:18 pm

    If the D’rays score one or more in the top of the ninth and we lose because the heart of the order went 1-2-3 with runners on 1st and 2nd and no outs…

    We deserve it.

  128. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:18 pm

    Angie’s got the cleavage outfit on tonight. Just a heads up for anybody who was making a beer run during the post-game preview.

  129. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 9:18 pm

    Any idea who’s going to pitch the ninth? Oh My, I just hAd a TerriblE thought come tO mind.

  130. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:20 pm

    This is a game that even winning will feel a lot like losing.

  131. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:20 pm

    Sherrill made Lee look about as good as Raul did last inning

  132. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:20 pm

    129

    LOL How long ya been waiting to squeeze THAT one out?!

  133. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:21 pm

    128 — Angie is nastified, bro.

  134. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    WHAT? SHERRILL FOR MATEO???? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  135. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    Mateo?

  136. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    I really don’t understand Sherrill sometimes. K two guys in a row on nothing but strikes, then walk the next batter on 4 pitches.

  137. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    Julio Mateo, Hargrove’s go-to-guy.

  138. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    133 – Part of the charm.

  139. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    Grover just wants to when with “skill points”

    CHOOSING to use BOTH Mateo and Willie in crucial situations

  140. marbledog on August 8th, 2006 9:24 pm

    Mateo??????

    Where is Lauren? Sorry, Lauren if you’re around – I don’t mean to steal your thunder, but…

    AGHHCCK!!! FUCK!!!

  141. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:24 pm

    Uh that should say “win” with “degree of difficulty” points

  142. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:25 pm

    Hargrove: Sherrill’s looking pretty good out there…we won’t have none of that. I’m bringing in Mateo.
    Chaves: Really?
    Hargrove: Problem?
    Chaves: You know that he kinda struggles in these situations…
    Hargrove: :o )

  143. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:25 pm

    Doesn’t the gas can EVER get tired?

  144. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:26 pm

    If we have limited options tonight doesn’t it make sense to at least let Sherrill complete an innning? My god…

  145. marbledog on August 8th, 2006 9:26 pm

    PHEW.

  146. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:27 pm

    144; it’s not like it’s a tie ballgame going into the bottom of the ninth…

  147. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:27 pm

    Mateo’s ‘good’ for two or three…

  148. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:27 pm

    Due up:

    RIVERA
    BETANCOURT
    BLOOMQUIST

    Now can you NOT score with a murderer’s row like that?

  149. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 9:27 pm

    JeffS… Sure, you know, if there was any reason to believe that we might see extra innings. Like if the score was tied in the eight, something like that.

  150. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 9:27 pm

    Hargrove just wants Mateo to get the win.

  151. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:28 pm

    Here comes a powderkeg, nay a juggernaut of offense in the ninth..

  152. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:28 pm

    At least he was smart enough to bring him against a rookie who’s batting like he’s a seasoned Mariner with a $10 million contract. I mean what are the chances we’re going to need a pitcher in the 10th?

  153. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:30 pm

    Hey, we kind of look like we are fielding an A’s like lineup this half of the inning ;)

  154. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:30 pm

    Mark Lowe is battling some elbow soreness, and though I heard he was available tonight, John Hickey is reporting that he won’t pitch in this series. The M’s are being cautious with their young arms, which we like.
    Last Friday, the Wall Street Journal had an article comparing best and worst managers. The conclusion was that the difference in game decisions between the best and worst was one game per season. The big difference, according to the article, was the willingness of the manager to pull the pitcher when the pitcher tired. The article pointed to Dusty Baker as an example of a manger who has burned through several pitchers by making them pitch too long. (He also was quoted as saying that he didn’t like players who walked a lot because “they just clog up the bases.”) So yes it is nice that Hargrove is protecting the young arms.
    Also, if Lowe has elbow soreness after pitching two innings, the idea of him as a starte becomes even less likely, in my opinion.

  155. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:31 pm

    If Rivera can’t hit a ball like that he should open a vein.

  156. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:32 pm

    It’s time for some IGNITION, gentlemen…

  157. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:32 pm

    Or not. Not sure how they could have caught such a scrappy pop fly.

  158. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:32 pm

    This is getting to be like a Wes Craven movie….

  159. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:32 pm

    Bloomquist doesn’t like waiting for no SECOND stinkin’ pitch to make his puny out.

  160. John in L.A. on August 8th, 2006 9:32 pm

    “This would be a good time for Willie’s first home run of the year.”

    Oh, Rick, you slay me.

    Stupid Hargrove.

  161. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Willie with 2 outs in the ninth again. Huge suprise!

    LOL, he was already out before I could even finish the first sentence!

  162. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Gritty one-pitch out!

    Unfortunately he was spared the title of ‘gritty one-pitch final-out-getter’ since it’s tied.

  163. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Man, bonus baseball. Hope I am staying up late in the lovely town of Evansville, Indiana, for a win.

  164. billT on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Well, he DID get it out of the infield this time.

  165. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    On the bright side, the more Willie plays the more the decision makers HAVE to see he’s nothing more than a defensive sub / pinch runner.

  166. Sports on a Schtick on August 8th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Death, taxes, and… well you know.

    That bottom of the ninth looked horrible, even on GameCast.

  167. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:35 pm

    Mateo is like one of those zombies who never gets tired and just keeps bringing you unrelenting horror, day after day, night after night.

  168. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 9:35 pm

    JM missed the target by a foot plus, but got the K.

  169. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:36 pm

    Except that instead of brains, he craves giving away ballgames.

  170. JAS on August 8th, 2006 9:37 pm

    The Wall Street Journal should hire writers that understand more about baseball than the cliche of the day.

    We have proof positive – ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY no less – that a bad manager can cost a team AT LEAST 10 games in little more than half a season.

  171. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:37 pm

    Speaking of zombies everybody buy Dead Rising tomorrow!

  172. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:37 pm

    158

    Good point!

    The M’s make you SCREAM 1, 2 & 3 times, because Hargrove manages them like they’re CURSED!

  173. chlebichuk on August 8th, 2006 9:39 pm

    this is my worst nightmare Mateo and the Ignitor in the ninth

  174. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:40 pm

    “Willie, being the hustler himself…gets to the ball quickly”

    I hate you.

  175. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:40 pm

    Nice gun by Rene! He evidently throws MUCH better than he hits.

  176. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:40 pm

    Nice. Rivera replaces Ibanez as the game’s clutch hispanic player for the M’s!

  177. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 9:40 pm

    Julio Mateo CLUTCH PERFORMER

  178. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:40 pm

    Devil’s due….good pitching, Mateo.

  179. lokiforever on August 8th, 2006 9:41 pm

    I don’t beleive it. How did we get out of that inning?

  180. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:41 pm

    Julio’s K’s are putting the swagger back in Grover’s walk.

  181. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:42 pm

    Can someone comment on how Mateo looks? The results have been good so far.

  182. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:42 pm

    You mean his “waddle?”

  183. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:42 pm

    Holy crap!

    We just survived 1.2 innings of Julio Mateo.

    Granted it wasn’t sudden death baseball…

    Is Putz available to get a save should the opportunity arise?

  184. Jerry Pezzino on August 8th, 2006 9:43 pm

    We’re at home…no save necessary?

  185. tgf on August 8th, 2006 9:43 pm

    181: Normal height, a little overweight, a wad of chew in his mouth as always.

  186. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:43 pm

    Ichiro!

  187. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 9:43 pm

    Ichiro finally gets one to not find a glove.

  188. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:43 pm

    We have fans from Nagasaki tonight — time for the Bomb, Ichiro.

  189. ConorGlassey on August 8th, 2006 9:44 pm

    I’m at the game and Meche is warming up in the bullpen. Hopefully we won’t need him. Woo Ichiro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  190. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:44 pm

    ICHI! FINALLY HAS HAPPENED

  191. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:44 pm

    Cmon JOSE!!

  192. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    Hai!!! Ichiro wa baysebaru oh jozu desu!!

  193. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    We won’t be seeing any of Putz, because there will never be any save situations.

  194. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    Seth McClung time hahaha

  195. DavidE on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    It’s just his hemorrhoids acting up again.

  196. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    188

    Does that mean Julio is “Fat Man” and Willie is “Little Boy?”

    (Ok, that was Hiroshima, but you get the idea)

  197. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    184

    Naw.

  198. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:45 pm

    I’ll take those answers that mateo looks the same as always… and ICHIRO! woo!!

  199. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:46 pm

    Nobody out, a RISP. I’m liking Tampa’s chances.

  200. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:46 pm

    189. I think this is Meche’s throw day.

  201. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:48 pm

    Actually, scratch 188. Making jokes about that was stupid and rude. I apologize.

  202. lokiforever on August 8th, 2006 9:49 pm

    Why is Lopez bunting?

  203. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:49 pm

    SQUEEZE!

  204. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:50 pm

    Major Disrespect for Sexson if Valle is right.

  205. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:50 pm

    Not the first time this year.

  206. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:50 pm

    Good move by TB. Beltre has been MUCH better lately and we know vs a righty Raul is usually money. Plus Sexson k’s about half the time with a runner on third and less than two outs. Heck, he k’s about half the time in about ANY situation, doesn’t he?

  207. lokiforever on August 8th, 2006 9:50 pm

    Now walk Raul to get to Richie….he loves that

  208. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:50 pm

    I for one think it would be amusing to see Sexson hit a walk-off grand slam.

  209. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    They’re gonna pitch to Richie because Richie, to borrow from Bill James, couldn’t hit a baby in the butt with a fly swatter.

    All we need in a damned flyball. Argh!

  210. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    That was the widest intentional ball I’ve ever seen.

  211. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    Things that will never happen but would be cool: Ichi stealing home on an intentional walk.

  212. Ike Aramba on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    the density of Grover’s thought processes are impenetrable to the likes of mere mortals like me.

  213. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    $10 says Hargrove has Sexson squeeze it here.

  214. Josh on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    That’s interesting, when Lopez bunted him over I was just thinking that if they were feeling lucky they’d intentionally walk the next two batters.

  215. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:51 pm

    Just hit an effin’ fly Sexson

  216. JAS on August 8th, 2006 9:52 pm

    I’ve never understood the strategy of taking the bat out of your best hitters’ hands…

  217. Norm Charlton Fan Club on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    Boo ya!

  218. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    BIG SEXY!!!!!!!!! BIGGGGGGG SEXY!!!!!!!!!

  219. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    215

    Well that will do!!!

  220. DKCecil on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    DAVE IN PAULO ALTO I LOVE YOU

  221. Phoenician Todd on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    OMFG!!!!!

  222. G-Man on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    Rye bread, please.

  223. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    208. Very prescient.

  224. JI on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    That’ll do Rich, that’ll do.

  225. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    you can thank me later :)

  226. argh on August 8th, 2006 9:53 pm

    That was worth waiting for.

  227. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 9:54 pm

    Beltre or Ibanez should have gone Miguel Cabrera style and put an intentional ball in play.

  228. marbledog on August 8th, 2006 9:54 pm

    When will they learn to not walk Raul.

    Incredible stuff.

  229. DavidE on August 8th, 2006 9:56 pm

    FREE BEER FOR DAVE IN PALO ALTO!!!! :-)

  230. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 9:57 pm

    Let’s pray for a Texas come back!

  231. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 9:59 pm

    If Bloomquist is dead last in Sugging percentage minus batting average, is Sexson near the top? It was 222 going into this game.

  232. chlebichuk on August 8th, 2006 10:00 pm

    I LOVE big Sexy.

  233. argh on August 8th, 2006 10:03 pm

    I refuse to believe Willie is dead last in Sugging.

  234. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 10:03 pm

    That was Felix’s best game this year.

  235. Huskermariner on August 8th, 2006 10:04 pm

    Who can share with us Richie’s numbers following a Raul IBB this year?

  236. apunetid on August 8th, 2006 10:04 pm

    Texas has scored two in the ninth and has the tying run on base.

  237. Sports on a Schtick on August 8th, 2006 10:04 pm

    That looked great on GameCast. As soon as the ball was going to the outfield, I knew it was good. When that thing crept over the wall… wow. As much as people rag Richie, he’s been clutch more than a few times this season.

  238. Newby on August 8th, 2006 10:05 pm

    234- wrong, his best game was the angels game.

  239. msb on August 8th, 2006 10:05 pm

    well, thank goodness Willie got those ABs.

    ok, so the bullpen gets some rest, and Julio is pretty much guaranteed of a day-off tomorrow.

    you know, getting back to Doyle, if he had come up, he’d prob. be parked on the bench next to Adam right about now.

  240. gwangung on August 8th, 2006 10:06 pm

    Gee, Richie, what a way to fatten up that OPS….

  241. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 10:06 pm

    Wow, can the A’s get anymore lucky than that?

  242. msb on August 8th, 2006 10:07 pm

    you know, Richie does feel it is his job to get RBIs.

  243. Rick L on August 8th, 2006 10:07 pm

    235. 8 for 12 with 4 home runs.

  244. lmpike on August 8th, 2006 10:07 pm

    According to the broadcast Richie is now 8 for 12 with 4 home runs and 21 RBIs after Ibanez is walked.

  245. Oly Rainiers Fan on August 8th, 2006 10:08 pm

    Okay, hi.

    Reality check. It just took us extra innings to beat Tampa Bay, a team that is 21 games back and at the bottom of their division, with an 18-40 record on the road, when our best pitcher threw 8 innings.

    Oh yeah, we’re definitely a team to be excited about.

  246. Huskermariner on August 8th, 2006 10:10 pm

    Thanks 243/244. Hopefully the opposing teams didn’t listen to the broadcast ;o)

  247. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 10:10 pm

    Sorry, I shouldn’t have been that forward… but Oly — can’t we just enjoy this win?

  248. msb on August 8th, 2006 10:12 pm

    #241– well, apparently they also have the weakest schedule of any team in the West the rest of the way out….

  249. scraps on August 8th, 2006 10:13 pm

    245: Do you think anyone is actually unaware of that, or needs a “reality check”?

    If you can’t get excited about the way the game ended, too bad for you.

  250. IdahoInvader on August 8th, 2006 10:17 pm

    Good call on whoever said Seo was Joe Blanton back at the start of the thread. Great to win an ugly game like this.

    What are the odds? Rivera blows a game late on the same night Mateo wins a game!

  251. JeffS on August 8th, 2006 10:18 pm

    Mateo has won two straight :)

  252. chief on August 8th, 2006 10:19 pm

    #23p – MSB, FWIW Doyle was 0 for 3 tonight, BA is now .215.

  253. Josh on August 8th, 2006 10:19 pm

    Mateo sucks. :)

  254. chief on August 8th, 2006 10:20 pm

    ooops, sorry that should have been #239.

  255. msb on August 8th, 2006 10:21 pm

    #253. I know. This was really harkening back to Dave’s earlier Random notes thread & the Doyle discussion there.

  256. msb on August 8th, 2006 10:25 pm

    so, does the future of the free world hang in the balance, only to be determined by which gal makes the Sonics dance team??

  257. carcinogen on August 8th, 2006 10:40 pm

    Let’s look on the bright side: WFB had no GIDPs.

  258. Dave in Palo Alto on August 8th, 2006 10:43 pm

    Man, I can’t imagine it being easy to be a rays fan. The M’s sure do lose alot of bad games, but I can’t remember keeping a team at 1 run through 9 innings only to lose in a walk-off grand slam.

  259. Wells on August 8th, 2006 10:51 pm

    Does anyone have the exact numbers for Richie this year in the PRIIBB category? You know, Post Raul Ibanez Intentional Base on Balls? It’s gotta be like a .900 average. He’s automatic. In that situation only.

  260. Ike Aramba on August 8th, 2006 10:56 pm

    Has anyone looked into hypnotizing Richie into believing the bases are loaded every time he’s at bat?

  261. Newby on August 8th, 2006 11:14 pm

    259- FSN had him at 8-12 before that last at bat with 21 rbis.

  262. Nate on August 8th, 2006 11:22 pm

    260, I’d rather he were hypnotized to believe they just IBB’d raul in front of him every time he’s at bat.

  263. mln on August 8th, 2006 11:32 pm

    Richie Sexson is a Clutch God!

    Or at least a minor deity….

  264. Lauren, token chick on August 9th, 2006 12:59 am

    Yay! Most awesome. Glad to see someone flew the profanity flag in my absence.

  265. JMHawkins on August 9th, 2006 1:36 am

    All’s well that end’s well, I guess.

    But man, Grover infuriated me this game. What was it, the seventh?, when he bunted a .300 hitter to get to a .220 hitter, pinch ran for his good-hitting catcher, and burned his reserve OF, all in one inning with zero results? Aiyyyyieeeeee!!!!!!

    I believe Jeff Nye has given Willie his new nickname. Spork. I love it.

    In the OPS discussion, I saw lots of discussion about scoring runs, but I missed the “avoiding outs” part. You gotta move someone 4 bases before you make 3 outs. In OBP+SLG, OBP is largely the “avoiding outs” part and SLG is largely the “moving runners” part. Getting on base both avoids the out and moves a runner (even if it’s the batter moving down to first – that’s 1 base down, three to go…). So starting with OBP getting a 2x multiplier is reasonable, since it does double duty. Of course, hits and especially XBH can move multiple runners in front of the batter, so SLG regains a bit of ground.

    Plus, walks do count for “moving runners” and adding walks into SLG gives essentially OBP+ISO, so you could use a “modified” OPS of OBP+(OBP+ISO) or 2*OPB + ISO. Dave’s emperical results are probably better, but I like thinking there’s at least a half-assed theory backing it up.

    Oh, and for the record, Grand Slams are a really, really good way to avoid making an out.

  266. terry on August 9th, 2006 3:18 am

    Ritche before the break: .218/.288/.418

    Ritchie after the break: .247/.313/.573

    It’s a damn shame he doesnt walk….

  267. David* on August 9th, 2006 5:38 am

    Richie Sexson, almost as clutch as Carl Everett!

  268. Steve T on August 9th, 2006 8:34 am

    Willie isn’t last in Slugging, and no one said he was. He’s actually not even last in Isolated Slugging (PA>100) anymore, as the immortal Jason Tyner (one extra base hit, a double, in 105 PA, for an ISO of .010) has crossed the threshold. Willie’s second-last, with almost twice the PA of Tyler. Note that Tyner can at least hit a little, and get on base; he’s .362/.327 to Willie’s .320/.280. TWO EIGHTY SLUG. Why, that’s only tenth-worst in all of baseball (Abraham Nunez is slugging .215, which is keeping my Hacking Mass team afloat).

    Sexson is alas nowhere near the top of the ISO table (again, 100 PA cutoff). His .227 is well behind Pujols’s .361 or even Raul’s .239. Richie is just ahead of Jonny Gomes and right behind, cough cough, Rich Aurilia.

  269. kcw2 on August 9th, 2006 8:48 am

    Richie Sexson question. I read once that Ted Williams was a big believer in shoulder rotation as being an indicator of a player’s ability to hit. I believe I read this in the context of his watching Michael Jordan try to hit, and Williams explaining why he would not be a big league hitter. Thus, if you hit right handed, your right shoulder will face the pitcher after your swing, or, even more towards third base if you have a flexible, “good” swing. Does RS have the least flexible swing you have ever seen? His right shoulder barely gets to 1st base.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.