<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s graph is attendance and win percentage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:22:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154234</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154234</guid>
		<description>18:  Not really.  Attendance trails team performance by one year.  The difference in attendance between 2002 and 2003 was primarily due to the ticket sales for games in the early months of the season.  Coming off the 2001 playoffs, advance ticket sales were strong in 2002, and there were only a handful of games in 2002 in which the team drew fewer than 35,000 – even in April and May.  In 2003, coming off a season in which the team was essentially out of contention by September 1, ticket sales for the early season games lagged significantly -- games under 30,000 were common.  

The M&#039;s missed the playoffs those years because their players were not as good (in terms of both talent and performance) as their rivals, not because they were &quot;boring&quot; or &quot;predictable.&quot;  

I would agree, however, that bad players who consistently make outs are &quot;boring&quot; and &quot;predictable.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18:  Not really.  Attendance trails team performance by one year.  The difference in attendance between 2002 and 2003 was primarily due to the ticket sales for games in the early months of the season.  Coming off the 2001 playoffs, advance ticket sales were strong in 2002, and there were only a handful of games in 2002 in which the team drew fewer than 35,000 – even in April and May.  In 2003, coming off a season in which the team was essentially out of contention by September 1, ticket sales for the early season games lagged significantly &#8212; games under 30,000 were common.  </p>
<p>The M&#8217;s missed the playoffs those years because their players were not as good (in terms of both talent and performance) as their rivals, not because they were &#8220;boring&#8221; or &#8220;predictable.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I would agree, however, that bad players who consistently make outs are &#8220;boring&#8221; and &#8220;predictable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154203</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154203</guid>
		<description>The problem with win pct vs payroll is that the cost of players keeps going up. Payroll rank, which was yesterday, shows you relatively how the team&#039;s doing among its peers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with win pct vs payroll is that the cost of players keeps going up. Payroll rank, which was yesterday, shows you relatively how the team&#8217;s doing among its peers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154195</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154195</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;While I’m sure they want to reverse this trend, I doubt they are in desperation mode from a bottom line standpoint.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;

Perhaps not desparate from a cash flow point of view however, trends like that can cause cut-backs in painful areas and people can lose their job over.  Couple this with a management team that has yet to figure out to put a winning team on the field in a city absolutely loaded with summer entertainment and I think it&#039;s easy to be worried if your on the mnariner staff.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>While I’m sure they want to reverse this trend, I doubt they are in desperation mode from a bottom line standpoint.</b><b></p>
<p>Perhaps not desparate from a cash flow point of view however, trends like that can cause cut-backs in painful areas and people can lose their job over.  Couple this with a management team that has yet to figure out to put a winning team on the field in a city absolutely loaded with summer entertainment and I think it&#8217;s easy to be worried if your on the mnariner staff.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomez</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154187</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154187</guid>
		<description>16.  Grizz, think: could the former have been a big factor in the latter?  Predictability helps your enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16.  Grizz, think: could the former have been a big factor in the latter?  Predictability helps your enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154178</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154178</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m always amazed how much cheaper the beer is (and concessions in general) at *any* other ballpark.&lt;/i&gt;
But it&#039;s not as good.  I went to three games in Toronto this season and the beer selection was appalling.  Nothing but Labatt Blue and Bud.  I did get a tasty Reuben sandwich, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m always amazed how much cheaper the beer is (and concessions in general) at *any* other ballpark.</i><br />
But it&#8217;s not as good.  I went to three games in Toronto this season and the beer selection was appalling.  Nothing but Labatt Blue and Bud.  I did get a tasty Reuben sandwich, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154170</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154170</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it was the boring roster, not the whole falling out of contention and missing the playoffs in 2002 and 2003 despite a winning record thing, that kept people away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it was the boring roster, not the whole falling out of contention and missing the playoffs in 2002 and 2003 despite a winning record thing, that kept people away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomez</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154158</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154158</guid>
		<description>Though the decline began back in 2003 when the team was still winning, the composition of the team had already began to grow predictably stale.  That predictablility in roster construction likely led to the boring, predictable product on the field, even in winning, and help to begin the attendance slide.

This team not only needs to win again, but needs to find a way to truly energize and excite the fanbase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the decline began back in 2003 when the team was still winning, the composition of the team had already began to grow predictably stale.  That predictablility in roster construction likely led to the boring, predictable product on the field, even in winning, and help to begin the attendance slide.</p>
<p>This team not only needs to win again, but needs to find a way to truly energize and excite the fanbase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports on a Schtick</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154143</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports on a Schtick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154143</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like an unfun roller coaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like an unfun roller coaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisK</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154119</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154119</guid>
		<description>#10 - The Mariners are in the midst of a 10-year, $288 million cable deal with Fox Sports Net, regardless of their win-loss record during those 10 years. I&#039;m not sure of their radio deal but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if that was a multi-year deal as well. So those are guaranteed revenue streams (and huge ones at that) regardless of their record for the foreseeable future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10 &#8211; The Mariners are in the midst of a 10-year, $288 million cable deal with Fox Sports Net, regardless of their win-loss record during those 10 years. I&#8217;m not sure of their radio deal but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if that was a multi-year deal as well. So those are guaranteed revenue streams (and huge ones at that) regardless of their record for the foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-154118</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/11/21/graph-of-the-day-for-tuesday/#comment-154118</guid>
		<description>Bad hijacker! Bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad hijacker! Bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
