Comments on: Community projections: Jose Guillen

By: Steve T

Steve T — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:27:56 +0000

Perhaps we should say “RBIs are stupid” and go on to something that matters.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:09:15 +0000

but HBP does?

By: Evan

Evan — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:36:54 +0000

Perhaps we should say that there is very litle correlation between RBIs and relevant hitting skills. That’s why some very mediocre (Joe Carter) or even bad (Tony Batista) hitters have put up quite good RBI totals over the years.

By: Steve T

Steve T — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:14:21 +0000

I’m gonna stick with “don’t have anything to do with”, thanks.

By: Typical Idiot Fan

Typical Idiot Fan — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:37:08 +0000

I don’t know, because they don’t have anything to do with a player’s performance?

I wouldn’t say they don’t have “anything” to do with it. It’s just a wrong way of looking at / gauging a player’s performance.

By: DMZ

DMZ — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:12:16 +0000

I don’t know, because they don’t have anything to do with a player’s performance?

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:09:38 +0000

I’m sure this was discussed before but why aren’t RBI’s projected?

By: Goose

Goose — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:51:02 +0000

According to the spreadsheet, Dave’s projection is this:

.280/.345/.480

By: Grizz

Grizz — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:23:19 +0000

There is a legitimate concern with a guy like Guillen who is a risk to finish the year with more HBP than BB.

By: RaoulDuke37

RaoulDuke37 — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:03:36 +0000

Career Numbers:

Safeco .246/.278/.420 (43 PA)
In LAA .311/.371/.495 (345 PA)
In OAK .256/.305/.455 (132 PA)
In TEX .274/.357/.581 (70 PA)