<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summing Up Felix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:32:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken in London</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken in London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172293</guid>
		<description>As I recall, another dominant right-handed pitcher that fell off towards first base was Bob Gibson, and in a more dramatic fashion. If I remember correctly, he said that pitchers should go with their natural motion, even if it put them in a nominally awkward position for fielding. In other words, make the pitch, then get ready to field (I think the comments were in Joe Morgan&#039;s book, Idiots Guide to Baseball or something like - is it embarrassing to admit I have a copy?). And, again if I recall correctly, Gibson was considered a good fielding pitcher in his day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, another dominant right-handed pitcher that fell off towards first base was Bob Gibson, and in a more dramatic fashion. If I remember correctly, he said that pitchers should go with their natural motion, even if it put them in a nominally awkward position for fielding. In other words, make the pitch, then get ready to field (I think the comments were in Joe Morgan&#8217;s book, Idiots Guide to Baseball or something like &#8211; is it embarrassing to admit I have a copy?). And, again if I recall correctly, Gibson was considered a good fielding pitcher in his day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenician Todd</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172280</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenician Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172280</guid>
		<description>Gotta love it, Kruk just dropped another &quot;King Felix&quot; reference. god I love this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love it, Kruk just dropped another &#8220;King Felix&#8221; reference. god I love this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrkenny</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172274</link>
		<dc:creator>mrkenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172274</guid>
		<description>the main difference in a perfect game vs a no-no:  
a no-no aka a no-hitter is where there can be any number of walks  or hit batsmen but no earned runs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the main difference in a perfect game vs a no-no:<br />
a no-no aka a no-hitter is where there can be any number of walks  or hit batsmen but no earned runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172212</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172212</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how much The King&#039;s performance yesterday has aroused the greed of several Yankee fans (sandwiched between a lot of awed comments, and gratitude for beating the Red Sox), as evidenced by a thread on &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.nyyfans.com/showthread.php?t=102505&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nyyfans.com&lt;/a&gt;. 

To wit:  1. &lt;em&gt;&quot;Anyway, after looking around he&#039;s should be a FA after the 2010 season right?  Here&#039;s to King Felix to the Bronx in 2011...&quot;&lt;/em&gt; 

2.  &lt;em&gt;&quot;After watching the Boston game last night I would say if Felix is as good as he is now in 2010. I say we get him a contract for the Yankees. Not to bring any of your hopes down but 3 years is a long time. A lot can happen in 3 years.But from what I&#039;m seeing now I say we sign him with the Yankees when he becomes a free agent.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

3.  &lt;em&gt;&quot;Seattle better be careful or they&#039;ll become the replacement for the 90&#039;s Tigers.  [...] And according to this site [Hernandez] is currently under a one year contract. This could mean we either get a shot at him in December or he could end up being a mid-season trade within the next few years as the M&#039;s continue to decline. Good spot to use those prospects, eh?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  (funny...the latter 2 Yankee fans evidently forgot about the 6-year team-control rights)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how much The King&#8217;s performance yesterday has aroused the greed of several Yankee fans (sandwiched between a lot of awed comments, and gratitude for beating the Red Sox), as evidenced by a thread on <a href="http://forums.nyyfans.com/showthread.php?t=102505" rel="nofollow">nyyfans.com</a>. </p>
<p>To wit:  1. <em>&#8220;Anyway, after looking around he&#8217;s should be a FA after the 2010 season right?  Here&#8217;s to King Felix to the Bronx in 2011&#8230;&#8221;</em> </p>
<p>2.  <em>&#8220;After watching the Boston game last night I would say if Felix is as good as he is now in 2010. I say we get him a contract for the Yankees. Not to bring any of your hopes down but 3 years is a long time. A lot can happen in 3 years.But from what I&#8217;m seeing now I say we sign him with the Yankees when he becomes a free agent.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>3.  <em>&#8220;Seattle better be careful or they&#8217;ll become the replacement for the 90&#8217;s Tigers.  [...] And according to this site [Hernandez] is currently under a one year contract. This could mean we either get a shot at him in December or he could end up being a mid-season trade within the next few years as the M&#8217;s continue to decline. Good spot to use those prospects, eh?&#8221;</em>  (funny&#8230;the latter 2 Yankee fans evidently forgot about the 6-year team-control rights)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Egaas</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Egaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172128</guid>
		<description>Dave, are you still charting Felix?  He&#039;s been dominant thus far, have there been any changes in patterns or just better execution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, are you still charting Felix?  He&#8217;s been dominant thus far, have there been any changes in patterns or just better execution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172127</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;While not superstitious, I ceritnaly didn’t lik ethe announcers calling it out from teh 5th inning.&lt;/i&gt;

The main problem with starting to discuss it in the 5th inning is that it&#039;s just soooo far from being completed.  By the 7th and certainly 8th, you&#039;ve got to mention it, as a responsible broadcaster, but if it&#039;s noteworthy that there are no hits after five innings, it should be self-evident that it&#039;s not too likely the pitcher&#039;s going to make it four more innings without allowing a hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>While not superstitious, I ceritnaly didn’t lik ethe announcers calling it out from teh 5th inning.</i></p>
<p>The main problem with starting to discuss it in the 5th inning is that it&#8217;s just soooo far from being completed.  By the 7th and certainly 8th, you&#8217;ve got to mention it, as a responsible broadcaster, but if it&#8217;s noteworthy that there are no hits after five innings, it should be self-evident that it&#8217;s not too likely the pitcher&#8217;s going to make it four more innings without allowing a hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lokiforever</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172117</link>
		<dc:creator>lokiforever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172117</guid>
		<description>No hits, no runs....thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No hits, no runs&#8230;.thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172112</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172112</guid>
		<description>&quot;No hits, no runs.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No hits, no runs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarinerDan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172110</link>
		<dc:creator>MarinerDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172110</guid>
		<description>To my knowledge, &quot;no-no&quot; always referenced a no-hitter, not a perfect game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my knowledge, &#8220;no-no&#8221; always referenced a no-hitter, not a perfect game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/comment-page-1/#comment-172109</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/04/12/summing-up-felix/#comment-172109</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His mechanics aren’t great, but they’re not horrible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As long as his mechanics produce those pitches, his mechanics are great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His mechanics aren’t great, but they’re not horrible.</p></blockquote>
<p>As long as his mechanics produce those pitches, his mechanics are great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
