Game 40, Mariners at Indians

Dave · May 21, 2007 at 1:01 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

Baek vs Sabathia, 4:05 pm.

The Indians are a good team and Sabathia’s a very good pitcher. But at least he’s left-handed, so there’s a good chance we’ll put some runs on the board. Except that Willie has been so awesome this year, he’s earned a second straight start in left field.

I’m sure Jason Ellison is thrilled.

Comments

199 Responses to “Game 40, Mariners at Indians”

  1. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:07 pm

    Hey, who are we ignorant fans to argue with a .103/.161/.138 line?

  2. Beniitec on May 21st, 2007 4:09 pm

    What’s your sample size? How many times do we have to discuss sample size???? I mean I know it’s Willie B, but at least tell us how many at bats the guy has.

  3. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:09 pm

    Why’s Ibanez still out?

  4. PositivePaul on May 21st, 2007 4:09 pm

    And a sub-Mendoza Sexson batting cleanup again. Wowwee Zoweee!!!!

  5. PositivePaul on May 21st, 2007 4:10 pm

    Ibanez has back spasms.

  6. SexsonPower on May 21st, 2007 4:10 pm

    Ok we need a win here today. If we are looking to get back in the heat of the AL West race now is the time. So lets do it.

  7. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:10 pm

    My apologies. Who are we ignorant fans to argue with a career .253/.307/.323 line?

  8. Tek Jansen on May 21st, 2007 4:10 pm

    You know, Vidro is just like Ichiro, minus the speed, defensive ability, and power. Vidro is a singles hitting Frank Thomas.

  9. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:11 pm

    I love that Ibanez’s injury was caused by sleeping.

  10. Eugene on May 21st, 2007 4:14 pm

    That’s better than having the injury been caused by carrying his wife’s luggage.

  11. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 4:14 pm

    better the sleep injury than the dreaded “samsonitis”

  12. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:14 pm

    Did you know that Willie Bloomquist is just 2,761 hits away from 3,000?

  13. SexsonPower on May 21st, 2007 4:15 pm

    come on beltre!

  14. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:16 pm

    12: if we count Willie’s spring training hits, her’s practically there.

  15. PositivePaul on May 21st, 2007 4:16 pm

    Did you know that Willie Bloomquist is just 2,761 hits away from 3,000?

    Wow, I didn’t realize he’s that close.

    He’s also only 751 HRs away from Aaron!

  16. Grizz on May 21st, 2007 4:16 pm

    Let’s be fair, Jim. Bloomquist’s carrer line against LHP is 265/318/356.

    Of course, Ellison’s same career line is 297/345/443.

  17. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 4:17 pm

    And another scoreless inning brought to you by the M’s offense.

  18. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:17 pm

    Wow, spelling mistake on 14, should be “he” (I’m sure there are a lot of jokes that could be made here).

  19. Tek Jansen on May 21st, 2007 4:17 pm

    Well, we can’t play Ellison too much and risk tiring him out for the stretch run.

  20. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:19 pm

    Did you know that all Bloomquist needs to hit for the cycle tonight is a single, a double, a triple and a home run?

  21. SexsonPower on May 21st, 2007 4:19 pm

    how many ruuners are we going to strand today? any guesses?

  22. Tek Jansen on May 21st, 2007 4:19 pm

    Grover’s response after the game: “We hit some balls hard.”

  23. pygmalion on May 21st, 2007 4:19 pm

    Yeah! Let’s bring Ellison back in late August when we’re 13 games back of the Angels!

    It’ll be like 1995 all over again, except with fewer good players!

  24. Tek Jansen on May 21st, 2007 4:20 pm

    So, is the fact that the game is not televized in the Northwest a blessing in diguise?

  25. pygmalion on May 21st, 2007 4:20 pm

    An extra base hit?!! What’s that?! Are those legal?!

  26. SpokaneMsFan on May 21st, 2007 4:20 pm

    I say we strand at least double digits for the day, although now that I said that they’ll only strand 9 to spite me.

  27. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:20 pm

    Ichiro Thought Bubble Theater:

    “I am so freaking out of here.”

  28. joser on May 21st, 2007 4:23 pm

    Ironing shirt while wearing it. Best baseball player injury ever.

  29. Mat on May 21st, 2007 4:24 pm

    Could Ellison make it through the entire season and amass fewer than 40 AB? 8 AB in 39 games seems almost unfathomably low to me. Will they eventually start charging him admission to watch the games?

  30. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:24 pm

    I think Glenallen Hill might argue that.

  31. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:25 pm

    Willie’s also only 2,630 consecutive games away from tying Ripken.

  32. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:27 pm

    Hoo boy.

  33. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:27 pm

    Baek threw four fewer pitches in his inning of work than Sabathia. He’s clearly the better pitcher.

  34. Manzanillos Cup on May 21st, 2007 4:28 pm

    Enough sarcasm about Bloomquist- give the guy a break. Did you know that rom 2002 to 2007, he’s hit more homeruns that Mark McGwire?

  35. go mariners go huskies on May 21st, 2007 4:28 pm

    I thought Hargrove had benched Sexson! Can’t we all see the Broussard is the answer?! Is everyone taking crazy pills?

  36. Beniitec on May 21st, 2007 4:30 pm

    Hey now… He could very well hit the game winner today, then what are you gonna say? Well, he could.

  37. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:30 pm

    I wonder what the single-game LOB record is?

  38. Jordan of Boise on May 21st, 2007 4:36 pm

    Bloomquist up, man on 3rd, two out – ready for Ignition.

  39. bergamot on May 21st, 2007 4:36 pm

    Every out is moving the runner ahead one base. Let’s hope the umpires lose count of the number of outs this inning.

  40. go mariners go huskies on May 21st, 2007 4:36 pm
  41. joser on May 21st, 2007 4:38 pm

    I wonder what the single-game LOB record is?

    20, New York [vs Boston], 09-21-1956

  42. Lauren, token chick on May 21st, 2007 4:38 pm

    I propose we call the line above which Bloomquist is barely hovering the Mend Line.

  43. F-Rod on May 21st, 2007 4:38 pm

    nice ab there..way to work it

  44. Beniitec on May 21st, 2007 4:38 pm

    yes!!! ;) SCRAPPY

  45. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 4:39 pm

    You can’t teach that kind of plate discipline.

  46. SpokaneMsFan on May 21st, 2007 4:39 pm

    Well that’s the best thing I could hope for from WFB!

  47. bergamot on May 21st, 2007 4:39 pm

    Funk Quist!

  48. Jordan of Boise on May 21st, 2007 4:40 pm

    I propose we call it the Alberto Gonzalez line – you know, the measure at which someone sucks so bad that anyone would think on face value that the stinker would be lone gone, but, because of the irrational man-crush of their idiot boss, will never be shown the door.

  49. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 4:41 pm

    48. sure you’re not in the wrong blog?

  50. chuckm792 on May 21st, 2007 4:41 pm

    I’m all for #48. And put so eloquently, too…

  51. Lauren, token chick on May 21st, 2007 4:42 pm

    That was a fluid and logical working in of political angst. I applaud it!

  52. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:43 pm

    You know, it must frustrate Willie … all the times he’s gotten on base only to be stranded by Ichiro. I really respect him for not popping off to the press about it.

  53. joser on May 21st, 2007 4:43 pm

    Of course, despite how it seems (and how the past couple of years’ teams seem to play), high LOB numbers are going to correlate with good offensive teams, because to leave men on base you have to get them there… and at least some of the time you’re going to get the guys ahead of them home. For example, the Mariners team record for most left on base in a season (1257) was set by the 2001 team. The team record for fewest (1034) was set in 1983.

  54. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:44 pm

    I sometimes wonder if Lauren is mystified by the “man-crush” phenomenon. Are there “woman-crushes”?

  55. joser on May 21st, 2007 4:46 pm

    I get the impression Lauren understands men better than men do. But then most chicks, token or otherwise, generally do.

  56. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 4:47 pm

    I don’t understand men at all.

  57. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:47 pm

    I don’t understand Hargrove at all.

  58. joser on May 21st, 2007 4:48 pm

    Another infield hit for Vidro? How can this possibly be sustainable?

  59. SpokaneMsFan on May 21st, 2007 4:50 pm

    Is anyone else’s Gameday frozen?

  60. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:51 pm

    Anybody else’s Gameday frozen?

  61. pygmalion on May 21st, 2007 4:51 pm

    Yes

  62. F-Rod on May 21st, 2007 4:51 pm

    58 that was a well hit ball..a lot of infield hits are actually good hits whether it be diving balls stopped or ricochets like that..there was nothing wrong with that hit

  63. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 4:51 pm

    Wow, 59, I like your terminology!

  64. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 4:52 pm

    Sexson got a hit? /faints

  65. SpokaneMsFan on May 21st, 2007 4:52 pm

    Good call, I’m going to guess that I’m not the only one.

  66. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 4:53 pm

    i wish we could get a hit with RISP…

  67. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 4:54 pm

    Beauty. Go sit down Richie.

  68. Eugene on May 21st, 2007 4:54 pm

    Between Vidro and the Ignitor, who will homer next? And how many ABs in between homers? I guessing well over 200 for ABs and Bloomquist.

  69. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 4:55 pm

    jesus…the indians play-by-play just said the mariners self-destruct in the inning…he must not have watched any of our other games this year…

  70. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 4:58 pm

    Two more hits for Vidro. I wish all our hitters sucked like him.

  71. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 4:59 pm

    we’re 10-2 when Baek starts? why the hell did we pay weaver all that cash? we should have went with him from the beginning…

  72. Lauren, token chick on May 21st, 2007 5:00 pm

    Understand men?! Bwahaha.

    The phenomenon of the man-crush, however, makes complete sense. The addition of the prefix “man-” is just another way that straight men emphasize their straightness.

  73. msb on May 21st, 2007 5:03 pm

    Mike must have looked into Richie’s eyes and seen that he was ready to play once more. If not run the bases well.

  74. Benno on May 21st, 2007 5:03 pm

    Wow, nothing like having Sexson get a hit, and then promptly get picked off first to end the inning with a most unusual double play. He is having a brutal season so far.
    And I’m not advocating benching him for this. But I am curious how giving him some time off involves benchings him completely. Can’t he be give a day or two a week off? But I suppose that would require Hargrove to print up a few more alt-lineups for this year. Much easier to use the mimeograph at the beginning of the year.

  75. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:03 pm

    Anybody notice Jim Street is back doing the Mariner’ mailbag? Here is my question of the day:

    Could you please explain to me how to mathematically figure out what determines a team to be a half-game out of first place? I don’t understand it. Is it per every five innings or something else?

  76. colm on May 21st, 2007 5:04 pm

    what the hell was that?

  77. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:04 pm

    i bet richie would be off today if it was a right-hander on the hill for cleveland…

  78. Phoenician Todd on May 21st, 2007 5:05 pm

    I’m just impressed by the 10 pitch, followed by the 12 pitch at-bats; both outs!

  79. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 5:08 pm

    Yes – we have worked the opposing pitcher for 60 pitches in the first 3 innings. When is the last time we did that?

  80. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:08 pm

    if we don’t knock him in, i’m out of here…

  81. eponymous coward on May 21st, 2007 5:09 pm

    Two more hits for Vidro. I wish all our hitters sucked like him.

    Why, so we could score less than what we do now? Because that’s what a team of Vidros would do: lead the majors in BA, be close to the top in OBP, be dead last in XBH and SLG, and hit into the most GIDP in the majors.

    Oh, and said team would probably be the worst DEFENSE in the league too.

    But hey, if an empty .300 batting average makes you happy…

  82. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:09 pm

    I heart Johjima.

  83. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 5:11 pm

    Bakomariner – agreed. There’s only so much disappointment one can take….last night’s runners on 1st and second….and nary a run.

  84. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 5:11 pm

    #81
    You’re right. Getting hits is a bad thing.

    “Empty .300 average.” There’s a great new Sabrmetric.

  85. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:11 pm

    coward, you just made the best point about why BA is overrated in evaluating a batter…

  86. S1lent on May 21st, 2007 5:12 pm

    Yes, tie game.

  87. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:13 pm

    guess we can stay loki…

  88. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:13 pm

    I think we can all agree that an empty .300 is better than an empty .100, though.

  89. S1lent on May 21st, 2007 5:13 pm

    Nice, lets give away another out.

  90. atait on May 21st, 2007 5:14 pm

    Is there a worse baserunning team in baseball than us?

  91. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:14 pm

    so willie costs us two runs by NOT making contact…what a douche…

  92. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 5:15 pm

    Yep we can stay. But the fourth out on the base paths, sends me packing. 2 more to go.

  93. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:15 pm

    that wasn’t jose’s fault…that was a hit and run and douche-bag willie couldn’t make contact…

  94. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:15 pm

    Was that a steal or a hit and run?

  95. Lauren, token chick on May 21st, 2007 5:16 pm

    Ooh! Down to .097!

  96. Eugene on May 21st, 2007 5:16 pm

    In Vidro’s defense, he does have more walks on the season than our bottom four batters combined.

    Still, a .300/.350/.350 line is about what you might expect out of a full season of Dave Hanson, and is just not really going to cut it for a full time DH.

  97. eponymous coward on May 21st, 2007 5:18 pm

    “Empty .300 average.”

    Yes, there IS such a thing, if you ground into double plays and don’t hit anything but singles.

    Basically, Jose Vidro is the new Enos Cabell right now, except he takes a few more walks, hits for even less power, and has atrocious speed.

  98. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:19 pm

    Maybe we can bring Mario Mendoza back as a special hitting instructor to work with Willie.

  99. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:19 pm

    pretty sure it was a hit and run…

  100. Ollie in Raleigh on May 21st, 2007 5:21 pm

    Nice play Ritchie.

  101. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:21 pm

    Vidro is like Otis Nixon without speed. Otis’ last full season he hit 297/361/344.

  102. marbledog on May 21st, 2007 5:22 pm

    What is the difference between a “man-crush” and a “woman-crush,” anyway? Can a woman have a man-crush? Is the definition strictly limited to the gender of the person having the crush or is it a particular type of crush. Like, if I, a heterosexual female, declare that I have a crush on Pam Beasley, isn’t that really sort of a “man-crush” because I don’t actually want to have sex with her or anything.

    And, for the record, I don’t have either a man or a woman crush on Willie Bloomquist. On the “hot” scale from 1-10, he’s about a .8.

    And, yes, this is a totally relevant post.

  103. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:23 pm

    hopefully vidro doesn’t have the coke habit too…lol…

  104. Ollie in Raleigh on May 21st, 2007 5:24 pm

    That’s a record I bet Ichiro will care about.

  105. Dave Clapper on May 21st, 2007 5:25 pm

    103: A coke habit might actually make him move a little faster.

  106. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:27 pm

    griffey went yard…one behind killebrew…

  107. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:30 pm

    Nice AB by Jose.

  108. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:30 pm

    7 pitches then takes the eighth one for the team.

  109. bakomariner on May 21st, 2007 5:31 pm

    is guillen leading the league in getting hit?

  110. Swungonandbelted on May 21st, 2007 5:32 pm

    And once again Dave’s hopes are dashed when the ball fails to clear the fence between the foul poles =) Keep singing it Dave, one of these days it’s going over the fence for ‘ya!

  111. Ollie in Raleigh on May 21st, 2007 5:32 pm

    I wish there was more replays on MLB tv
    , he looked out, but it was close

  112. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 5:32 pm

    another base running out. 1 left

  113. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:33 pm

    Nothing wrong with being aggressive on the bases with 2 outs.

  114. msb on May 21st, 2007 5:33 pm

    just because it is the anniversary of the 1977 team, doesn’t mean they have to play like the 1977 team.

    if a man-crush is a non-sexual crush by another man, I guess a woman-crush would be the same for the other gender.

    and Willie isn’t close to an 8.

  115. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:34 pm

    Not an 8. I think she said .8 As in less than 1.

  116. marbledog on May 21st, 2007 5:34 pm

    .8

  117. msb on May 21st, 2007 5:35 pm

    thank god.

  118. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 5:35 pm

    Ralph – another one of those MLB aphorisms I don’t fully grok…but I’ll take your word for it.

  119. apunetid on May 21st, 2007 5:36 pm

    Cy Sueng Baek! (or whatever we always say when he has a good inning)

  120. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:37 pm

    Let me try to explain it…

    If you hold the runner at 3rd with 2 out, it will take another hit (or a walk followed by a hit or walk) to get him home. Clearly less than a 50% chance that he’ll score if you hold him.

    So if the 3rd base coach thinks it is close to 50-50 that he’ll score, he should take the chance and send him.

    With less than 2 outs, on the other hand, the chances of scoring him with one of the next batters are much higher than 50-50, so the coach should only send the runner if he’s much more sure he’ll score.

  121. lylepdx on May 21st, 2007 5:38 pm

    has there ever been a sub .100 season for someone with, say, 100+ a.b’s that isn’t a pitcher?

  122. skipj on May 21st, 2007 5:39 pm

    This game isn’t on TV why? The Indians are broadcasting; our announcers are there…the technology to take their feed and slap our announcers on it and have KSTW, ( currently showing the highly rated “My Wife and Kids” ) carry it simply isn’t available in 2007 I guess. Maybe someday…

  123. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:40 pm

    Rob Deer has the record for lowest BA by a player who qualified for the batting title, at .179. I’m not sure about 100+ AB’s, though.

  124. mike1997 on May 21st, 2007 5:40 pm

    Just woke up, how is Cy Baek looking?

  125. Eugene on May 21st, 2007 5:41 pm

    Sending him is the right call. Still, what is the expected number of runs given runners on second and third with two out? It’s got to be reasonably close to 0.6 or so.

  126. coasty141 on May 21st, 2007 5:41 pm

    Is there anywhere that they post OPS numbers for the hypothetical Replacement level player at different positions?

  127. Ralph Malph on May 21st, 2007 5:43 pm

    Ray Oyler hit .135 in 247 AB in 1968. Bob Buhl went 0 for 70 as a pitcher. Bill Bergen batted .132 in over 200 AB in 1911.

  128. Ollie in Raleigh on May 21st, 2007 5:47 pm

    nice series of pitches. now if only we could get some timely hitting…

  129. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 5:49 pm

    And that’s the game winner.

  130. marbledog on May 21st, 2007 5:53 pm

    Ollie, have you ever considered changing the spelling of your name to “Aleigh”?

    Just wondering.

  131. fallingceilingtiles on May 21st, 2007 5:54 pm

    we’re going to win this game.
    point blank .

  132. CSG on May 21st, 2007 5:55 pm

    And speaking of historically inept hitting, I fully expect Tim Lincecum to go through this season hitless. Basically, he hasn’t been allowed to pick up a bat since about his sophomore year of high school.

  133. argh on May 21st, 2007 5:55 pm

    How can we lose against a pitcher from East Bontang?

  134. marbledog on May 21st, 2007 5:56 pm

    I agree. We are going to win this game.

    I was at the fallingceilingtiles game, by the way. In line for it, at least.

  135. Dave Clapper on May 21st, 2007 5:58 pm

    Gameday is hilarious:

    WFB after 1-0 count: 0-13 (.000)
    WFB this month 1-16: (.063)

  136. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 5:59 pm

    #132: Ask Tyler Clippard. He hadn’t batted since high school, and he spanked a double in his debut last night.

    Or Joel Peralta, who whacked a two-run double last night after having not batted for years.

  137. F-Rod on May 21st, 2007 5:59 pm

    pretty questionable call there

  138. F-Rod on May 21st, 2007 6:00 pm

    this ump is crazy

  139. CSG on May 21st, 2007 6:01 pm

    I didn’t know that about Clippard; also, if I had to judge him by just his appearance, I would say he hadn’t yet entered high school.

  140. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 6:01 pm

    Well, you guys obviously have more faith in this team than I do. We’ll see.

  141. huhwhat on May 21st, 2007 6:03 pm

    Yes, Ichiro on base with 2 outs. Time for the super powers of Vidro to end the inning.

  142. agingfan on May 21st, 2007 6:03 pm

    I remain convinced that Morse would be a significant improvement in the utility role; his offensive edge makes up for his defensive limitations over Willie

  143. Dylan on May 21st, 2007 6:05 pm

    Anyone else have MLB.tv? I have the premium package and I can’t access it for some reason.

  144. Dylan on May 21st, 2007 6:06 pm

    What the hell? Did Ichiro ground out or get a hit?

  145. Dave Clapper on May 21st, 2007 6:08 pm

    144: Singled. And then Vidro did, too. Beyond that, I can’t tell you, because every part of ESPN.com is lagging behind. And FanGraphs doesn’t update until a PA is complete.

  146. firenintendo on May 21st, 2007 6:08 pm

    gamecast said he grounded out but then Virdro singled and Ichiro went to third. Great program

  147. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 6:09 pm

    And Guillen flies out.

  148. lokiforever on May 21st, 2007 6:12 pm

    Is it worse when we get a bunch of hits and lose, or when we don’t hit at all and lose? You know, we have more hits than they do, and yet…….

  149. Dave Clapper on May 21st, 2007 6:14 pm

    Watching on GameCast is odd. Obviously, I can’t see whether Cha is tired, but for several innings, I was blown away by how few pitches he was having to throw. And then in the 6th, the pitches per batter started going up and I thought, “Uh oh.” I was surprised to see him out again in the 7th, just based on the trend (and okay, the homer). Sure enough, hits to the first two batters, even after getting good counts.

  150. brian_sun on May 21st, 2007 6:16 pm

    why grover leaves Baek out so long?

  151. Dave Clapper on May 21st, 2007 6:16 pm

    ‘Scuse me: first batter hit the first pitch. Next two batters both had 0-2 counts, though, and one was a hit, the other, a walk. Methinks he’s done, Grover.

  152. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 6:17 pm

    So Baek is over 100 pitches, he’s just allowed the bases to get loaded with nobody out, and the decision is made to leave him in against Garko.

    Can’t see how this would backfire.

  153. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 6:19 pm

    #142: Defense matters. Morse has no position.

  154. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 6:19 pm

    And extreme pessimism wins out again.

  155. brian_sun on May 21st, 2007 6:19 pm

    da*n: you can almost see it coming. 2 run double, game over.

  156. joesuperdad on May 21st, 2007 6:19 pm

    Bloomquist may not have had a great shot at that ball, but he looked awful, turning in different directions, and making a weak throw.

  157. JMHawkins on May 21st, 2007 6:20 pm

    So nice of KOMO to do the traffic report during a critical part of the game.

    Bozos.

  158. brian_sun on May 21st, 2007 6:20 pm

    After Baek struck out Garko, why didn’t Grover take him out? The M’s lost his game because of Grover, no question about it. He should be fired on the spot.

  159. joesuperdad on May 21st, 2007 6:20 pm

    153 if defense matters, then why not play Ellison today? He is a legitimately good fielding outfielder, not a legendary good one like Willie.

  160. mike1997 on May 21st, 2007 6:21 pm

    Wow great move Grover, please, next time don’t change the pitcher till the game is well and truly out of reach. I guess this could be 1 of the reasons why the Mariners millions can’t get us some decent pitching.

  161. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 6:21 pm

    I agree. I’ve been the biggest Ellison booster here all season.

  162. brian_sun on May 21st, 2007 6:23 pm

    That was a ridiculously bad throw by the Ignitor.

  163. Jim Thomsen on May 21st, 2007 6:30 pm

    Ladies and gentlemen, the best team in baseball: The Cleveland Indians. Who don’t they do well?

  164. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 6:38 pm

    Vidro 3 for 4, now hitting an empty .311

    I get it. He has no power. But if someone behind him did….

  165. DMZ on May 21st, 2007 6:44 pm

    … he would still be a poor DH.

  166. David* on May 21st, 2007 6:47 pm

    Well the good news is that we’ve gotten deep into the Indians’ bullpen, so they’ll be tired for the rest of the series.

    Oh wait.

  167. Sidi on May 21st, 2007 6:49 pm

    It’s not just the lack of power. It’s the fact that he has zero defensive value and still only has a .349 OBP. If he was say…a slap hitting center fielder with great range, and a good arm, and tons of speed he’d have some value hitting .311.

    It’s not hard to find bats in the minors that would be more valuable than him, most of them just aren’t promoted because of questionable defense or being blocked at their position.

  168. joesuperdad on May 21st, 2007 6:58 pm

    Nice first pitch pop-up by Vidro.

  169. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 6:59 pm

    There’s your man Auburn, getting the big hits when they count.

  170. msb on May 21st, 2007 6:59 pm

    well, I was going to ask how long after bases-loaded-nobody-out it would take for them to fail, but in the time it took to pull the page back up, they were already at 2 outs …

  171. Ollie in Raleigh on May 21st, 2007 7:00 pm

    bases juiced and 0 out…puke.

  172. msb on May 21st, 2007 7:02 pm

    ah, well. I got two chicken cut up — half in the freezer, half now cooked– and some stock going in the oven. that’s something, I guess.

  173. sad_loyal_fan on May 21st, 2007 7:05 pm

    Was it me, or was that one of the more depressing games of the season?

    Grover screws up by leaving Baek in too long and our anemic line up squanders opportunity after opportunity, including a ninth inning bases loaded with no outs and the top of the order. fantastic

  174. lylepdx on May 21st, 2007 7:08 pm

    It’s not hard to find bats in the minors that would be more valuable than him

    exactly.

    without stretching my brain at all i can think of 4 guys on the rainiers alone.

    and most of those guys would at least give you something in the field or in pinch run situations if you absolutely needed it.

  175. joesuperdad on May 21st, 2007 7:10 pm

    No, not the most depressing game of the season — all too typical. Maybe that’s why it’s depressing. We’ve seen it before.

  176. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 7:11 pm

    So there are 4 guys on the Rainiers who would hit over.300 right now in the show? Bring ‘em up!

  177. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 7:13 pm

    Lousy baserunning – again. Leaves the pitcher in too long – again. I’m getting real close to jumping on the fire Hargrove bandwagon.

  178. DKCecil on May 21st, 2007 7:15 pm

    Does a player have to hit .300 to be more valuable than Vidro right now? Can’t he do one or more of the multitude of things Vidro can’t right now? Like do anything besides hit singles or draw the occasional walk?

  179. msb on May 21st, 2007 7:40 pm

    the bullpen was mostly unavailable, per Drayer, between needing guys for the next 17 games without a break– plus Reitsma unavailable with a ’stiff elbow’

    in better news, Mark Lowe threw on flat ground today, down in Peoria.

  180. eponymous coward on May 21st, 2007 7:40 pm

    So there are 4 guys on the Rainiers who would hit over.300 right now in the show?

    No, but there were a number of “free” options this offseason were we not fixated on “must have veteran hitter with proven” whatever.

    Well, let’s see. Carlos Pena, available as a free agent, hitting .307/.374/.604.

    Hee Seop Choi, who apparently all of MLB hates, posted an OPS of .789 his lat year in the majors… considerably higher than Vidro’s this year. And he’s 28.

    Or, think of Bucky Jacobsen 2004. Really, it’s just not that hard to find guys who can give you a .750 OPS.

  181. milendriel on May 21st, 2007 7:42 pm

    Or Jack Cust.

  182. gwangung on May 21st, 2007 7:44 pm

    So there are 4 guys on the Rainiers who would hit over.300 right now in the show?

    Maybe not…but I’m pretty sure that there’d be people who could get you .350 or better in OBP, and a tad better than .400 slugging.

    (Really, now…focussing on batting average to the exclusion of everything else is a bit narrow. Who’s more valuable? Someone who hits .300 and gets on at a .330 clip? Or someone who hits .275 but gets on at a .375 clip? The key point here is not to get an out.

  183. colm on May 21st, 2007 9:19 pm

    lordy, it must have been depressing. This thread died young.

    And in other news, in Ballard B&GC Teeball, the Mighty Cobras went toe to toe with the Sluggers. Each team recorded a few out, and several balls even left the infield. Now that I think about it, each bunch of seven year olds actually recorded a double play, which is pretty darned impressive.

    I have no idea what the score was.

  184. Choska on May 21st, 2007 9:21 pm

    All of this is why the move to acquire Vidro at the expense of Snelling was, in the opinion of this blog, indefensible. Even if you thought Snelling was fragile, guys who can out hit Vidro at a fraction of the price are everywhere. Broussard was on the bench. Wladimir Belentin could probably do it.

    It will be fascinating to watch this team in the off-season to see what the owners do when facing the contracts of Sexson, Vidro, Ramirez and Batista. That is a TON of money tied up in counter-productive players.

  185. Dave on May 21st, 2007 10:04 pm

    The list of hitters in major league baseball who have hit for less power than Jose Vidro this year:

    Jason Kendall (catcher), David Eckstein (shortstop), Juan Pierre (center fielder), Omar Vizquel (shortstop), Luis Castillo (second baseman), and Jason Bartlett (shortstop).

    That’s it. That’s the entire list.

    Honestly, if you can’t figure out why it’s a problem to have a DH that has as much power as the lightest hitters of the light hitting positions, I really don’t know what else to tell you.

    Jose Vidro is one of the biggest problems on the roster. There’s a vast array of really awesome factual information available at your fingertips, Auburn, and a host of people here who are willing to help you learn more about the game. Posting nothing but “Vidro is hitting .310 now!” taunts is the equivalent to putting your fingers in your ears and sticking your tongue out at people.

    The opportunity to learn is there for you. I suggest you take it.

  186. AuburnM on May 21st, 2007 11:04 pm

    Dave,

    I get it. Vidro is not the ideal DH. But he hits a lot of singles and his OBP is pretty good. Pretty much what you want out of your #2 hitter.

    Really my only point is this: We have lots bigger problems than Vidro.

  187. awolfgang on May 21st, 2007 11:40 pm

    If baseball games were won by guys that got singles with no runners on or in scoring postion, and Ohh, yeah didn’t cost 6.5 mil or so, or cost us a good prospect, yes Doyle a prospect since he hadn’t yet or hasn’t yet lived up to his potential even though I like him, then Vidro would be awesome. The reality is the worst team in the N.L. was willing to get rid of him for an underachieving-oft-injured aussie and a AAA arm, that should tell you all you need to know about Vidro. I’ve said before, other that Ichiro, he looks the most comfortable at the plate, but he has no power, playing a position that demands it, and he has no defense skills, and no speed, so basically, as his OBP has shown, he is gets to first every once and awhile, with no RBIs or Rs to show for it.

  188. Axtell on May 21st, 2007 11:40 pm

    You want a DH who ‘hits a lot of singles’ and has a fair OBP? I think that too many people look at a +.300 BA and say ‘he’s doing good work!’ when in actuality, BA is one of the poorest ways to judge a hitter, and OBP is not what you want to measure your DH with.

    Doesn’t it concern you that Bettencourt has more HR’s this year than Vidro? Or Broussard in 1/5th the plate appearances?

    Vidro is absolutely killing the M’s with is lack of power…we don’t need another guy who gets a lot of singles, we need a guy (especially with Sexson performing so poorly) that is going to drive runners in. Vidro slugging for nearly .100 under Ichiro is absolutely inexcusable. Ichiro’s been on base 68 times this season, and has scored just 23 times.

  189. IdahoInvader on May 21st, 2007 11:44 pm

    Plus, how many guys named Jose do we need that swing at the first pitch in crunch time?

  190. awolfgang on May 21st, 2007 11:44 pm

    I’m sure Jose Canseco is looking for a come back.

  191. awolfgang on May 21st, 2007 11:49 pm

    Wait, I got it, the M’s front office heard the Star Spangled Banner at the begining of every game and thought that they needed a guy named Jose in their lineup.

    Jose can you see, by the dawn’s early light………..

  192. David* on May 22nd, 2007 5:13 am

    buh dum dum tsch

  193. AuburnM on May 22nd, 2007 6:54 am

    Vidro will continue to hit his singles. I will continue to worry about the rest of the lineup.

    And the starting pitching.

    And the bullpen getting burnt out.

    And Hargrove’s bizarre nonchalance.

  194. msb on May 22nd, 2007 8:16 am

    nonchalance? where do you get that?

  195. Beniitec on May 22nd, 2007 8:48 am

    So would a good move for Hargrove be to put Ibañez in at DH (put more power in the DH slot), Adam Jones in Left, and sit Vidro? And start shopping him? Vidro is hitting really well, but not for power. In past years, you could count on “some” power from Ibañez. Given the chance for his body to heal…(by only hitting) might help.

  196. Russ on May 22nd, 2007 9:00 am

    At this point, with this roster construction, we are simply moving the deck chairs about.

    There are so many issues that a simple line-up shuffle isn’t going to make a dramatic difference to the win column. They are simply a very average team with far too many below average performances being turned in. Even if everyone was playing at their best, they would be average. I think we can agree that many are not playing at the level they once did. The extreme lack of power on this team is our weakness and no amount of line-up card changes is going to fix this. Combine the inability to score runs with our rotation and what you get is more losses then wins.

  197. CaptainPoopy on May 22nd, 2007 12:05 pm

    #4.

    I have a quick question… Now, I understand what the Mendoza Line is, why is it named “mendoza line”? Who’s Mendoza?

    Reading this blog a long time… first comment/question. Yeah!

  198. Dave on May 22nd, 2007 12:11 pm

    Mario Mendoza:

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/mendoma01.shtml

    The irony – the season that he hit .198 and the “Mendoza Line” was created, he was playing for the Seattle Mariners.

  199. CaptainPoopy on May 22nd, 2007 12:17 pm

    Thanks Dave. Pretty funny stuff.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.