<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Win&#8230; Or Go Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:22:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scraps</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186318</link>
		<dc:creator>scraps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186318</guid>
		<description>Incompetence we can demonstrate.  Ignorance we can infer.  Apathy requires mind-reading.

I&#039;m not &lt;i&gt;preferring&lt;/i&gt; to call Hargrove incompetent and ignorant.  I&#039;m pointing out that they are justifiable conclusions, more defensible than mind reading, and that for some reason I can&#039;t understand, you insist that Hargrove not caring is the &lt;i&gt;only conclusion&lt;/i&gt; you can reach.  Forget generosity; it shows a lack of imagination on your part.

I admit that while I can&#039;t stand Hargrove as a manager and want him to GO, I don&#039;t feel compelled to conclude that he&#039;s deficient in character, except in the very human way of calcifying around a set of beliefs that he&#039;s probably always held.

It seems to me that the worst professional thing you can say about a sports person is that he doesn&#039;t care about winning, and that such a serious slam requires some solid evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incompetence we can demonstrate.  Ignorance we can infer.  Apathy requires mind-reading.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not <i>preferring</i> to call Hargrove incompetent and ignorant.  I&#8217;m pointing out that they are justifiable conclusions, more defensible than mind reading, and that for some reason I can&#8217;t understand, you insist that Hargrove not caring is the <i>only conclusion</i> you can reach.  Forget generosity; it shows a lack of imagination on your part.</p>
<p>I admit that while I can&#8217;t stand Hargrove as a manager and want him to GO, I don&#8217;t feel compelled to conclude that he&#8217;s deficient in character, except in the very human way of calcifying around a set of beliefs that he&#8217;s probably always held.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the worst professional thing you can say about a sports person is that he doesn&#8217;t care about winning, and that such a serious slam requires some solid evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etowncoug</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186296</link>
		<dc:creator>etowncoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186296</guid>
		<description>Yeah Paul,

If you call me incompetent, ignorant or say that I don&#039;t care about winning, I would take all three as an insult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Paul,</p>
<p>If you call me incompetent, ignorant or say that I don&#8217;t care about winning, I would take all three as an insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PositivePaul</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186295</link>
		<dc:creator>PositivePaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186295</guid>
		<description>Well, and putting Bloomquist in LF tonight over, say, Ellison, sure reeks of incompetance or ignorance in Hargrove.  I mean, heck, we have to give him the benefit of the doubt that he wants to win, don&#039;t we?

Don&#039;t we?

Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, and putting Bloomquist in LF tonight over, say, Ellison, sure reeks of incompetance or ignorance in Hargrove.  I mean, heck, we have to give him the benefit of the doubt that he wants to win, don&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etowncoug</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186290</link>
		<dc:creator>etowncoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186290</guid>
		<description>Scraps- you say I am an ungenerous mindreader yet you offer the &quot;charitable&quot; explanation that Hargrove is either ignorant or incompetent. 

I find it hard to believe that a major league manager wouldn&#039;t have easy access to information like the stuff we can get on the blogosphere.

Whatever the reason, I think we can all agree that Hargrove should be removed from his position and replaced with someone who can be an asset to the organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scraps- you say I am an ungenerous mindreader yet you offer the &#8220;charitable&#8221; explanation that Hargrove is either ignorant or incompetent. </p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that a major league manager wouldn&#8217;t have easy access to information like the stuff we can get on the blogosphere.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, I think we can all agree that Hargrove should be removed from his position and replaced with someone who can be an asset to the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scraps</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186285</link>
		<dc:creator>scraps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186285</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Hargrove says that he dislikes losing, but based on his actions I can only conclude that it really doesn’t bother him.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;ve already responded (in post 74) to your insistence that Hargrove&#039;s actions prove that losing doesn&#039;t bother him; I can only conclude that you are unwilling or unable to consider alternative conclusions that fit the facts just as well as your ungenerous mind-reading.  Obviously we&#039;re not going to come to an agreement about this, but I think it would broaden your understanding of human behavior considerably if you could find it within you to consider more charitable explanations for people&#039;s failures than lack of caring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Hargrove says that he dislikes losing, but based on his actions I can only conclude that it really doesn’t bother him.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve already responded (in post 74) to your insistence that Hargrove&#8217;s actions prove that losing doesn&#8217;t bother him; I can only conclude that you are unwilling or unable to consider alternative conclusions that fit the facts just as well as your ungenerous mind-reading.  Obviously we&#8217;re not going to come to an agreement about this, but I think it would broaden your understanding of human behavior considerably if you could find it within you to consider more charitable explanations for people&#8217;s failures than lack of caring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etowncoug</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186279</link>
		<dc:creator>etowncoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186279</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Hargrove likes losing, it does seem to irritate him. It&#039;s his actions based on his dislike of losing that show that winning is not his top priority.

Think of a person who says and acts as though he/she dislikes his or her job. If this person is really unhappy with the job, a new job will be found. Someone who really desires change, because current circumstances are completely unacceptable will go to great lengths to change.

Hargrove says that he dislikes losing, but based on his actions I can only conclude that it really doesn&#039;t bother him. You do have to give the guy a little bit of credit for starting to tinker with the lineup though, but it might be to little to late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Hargrove likes losing, it does seem to irritate him. It&#8217;s his actions based on his dislike of losing that show that winning is not his top priority.</p>
<p>Think of a person who says and acts as though he/she dislikes his or her job. If this person is really unhappy with the job, a new job will be found. Someone who really desires change, because current circumstances are completely unacceptable will go to great lengths to change.</p>
<p>Hargrove says that he dislikes losing, but based on his actions I can only conclude that it really doesn&#8217;t bother him. You do have to give the guy a little bit of credit for starting to tinker with the lineup though, but it might be to little to late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizz</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186278</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186278</guid>
		<description>Hargrove might not care about losing games, but he cares about losing his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hargrove might not care about losing games, but he cares about losing his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomez</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186277</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186277</guid>
		<description>I dunno, for someone who apparently couldn&#039;t care less if he loses, Hargrove&#039;s seemed pretty pissed post-game over the last couple days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, for someone who apparently couldn&#8217;t care less if he loses, Hargrove&#8217;s seemed pretty pissed post-game over the last couple days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186273</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186273</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; Hargrove loyalty is different. &lt;/b&gt;

For one thing, Grover has some competent alternatives...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> Hargrove loyalty is different. </b></p>
<p>For one thing, Grover has some competent alternatives&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etowncoug</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/comment-page-2/#comment-186271</link>
		<dc:creator>etowncoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/05/21/win-or-go-home/#comment-186271</guid>
		<description>Loyalty for Lou Piniella was sticking with Bobby Ayala and Norm Charlton. Both pitchers threw hard and were able to strike batters out (Ayala was k&#039;ing close to a batter an inning throughout his time in Seattle, Charlton has striking out batters at a decent clip until the very end when walk rates went up and K rates went down, still in 2001 he was a good pitcher so maybe Lou was right in 1997 that Norm still had something left in the tank). 

From a numbers standpoint, I&#039;m not sure what was wrong with Ayala. If you took away his W-L record, his ERA and his name and asked if you would take a relief pitcher with his K/9, BB/9 and HR/9 I think a lot of people would.

Hargrove loyalty is different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loyalty for Lou Piniella was sticking with Bobby Ayala and Norm Charlton. Both pitchers threw hard and were able to strike batters out (Ayala was k&#8217;ing close to a batter an inning throughout his time in Seattle, Charlton has striking out batters at a decent clip until the very end when walk rates went up and K rates went down, still in 2001 he was a good pitcher so maybe Lou was right in 1997 that Norm still had something left in the tank). </p>
<p>From a numbers standpoint, I&#8217;m not sure what was wrong with Ayala. If you took away his W-L record, his ERA and his name and asked if you would take a relief pitcher with his K/9, BB/9 and HR/9 I think a lot of people would.</p>
<p>Hargrove loyalty is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
