Game 153, Mariners at Angels

DMZ · September 21, 2007 at 6:20 pm · Filed Under Game Threads 

Washburn v Saunders! Joe Saunders. You know him, right? He’s that one guy.

Jones in left, bats 7th. Ibanez takes over at DH, Vidro takes first.

Also, Dave adds that Jorge Campillo was suspended for four games, and John McLaren for tonights game, as the result of Campillo throwing at Vladimir Guerrero last night. Honestly, I’m not sure four games is enough – what Campillo did was ridiculous and petty. Don’t like Vlad showing you up when you gave up a HR on your 85 MPH fastball? Hit him in the back. Message sent, move on. Throwing at someone’s head shouldn’t be tolerated, and honestly, if Vlad had charged the mound, I’d have been rooting for him to get a few good shots in before everyone broke it up. It’s basically inevitable that a Mariner hitter is going to get drilled in the next few days and we’re probably going to see a fight. Let’s just hope no one gets hurt because Jorge Campillo wanted to be an idiot.

Comments

126 Responses to “Game 153, Mariners at Angels”

  1. Dayve on September 21st, 2007 6:29 pm

    I’ll throw the first punch here, looks like rain in So Cal. Might be two tomorrow.

  2. lailaihei on September 21st, 2007 6:33 pm

    I disagree.
    I hope Campillo gets hurt and there can be stops of him starting pitching in ‘08.

  3. PositivePaul on September 21st, 2007 6:34 pm

    Hmm. Do we know for sure Jorge was aiming for Vlad’s head? I mean, yeah, he doesn’t have the greatest control of his pitches, and he could’ve indeed been aiming at his back…

  4. cgmonk on September 21st, 2007 6:37 pm

    Why do you advocate hitting a player with a baseball in his back but not his head? You’re still risking a player’s health and livelihood in throwing a baseball toward their back or in punching them.

  5. _David_ on September 21st, 2007 6:37 pm

    1, I’m 25 minutes south of Anaheim, it’s not raining.

  6. Dave on September 21st, 2007 6:37 pm

    The only thing Campillo has going for him is control of his pitches. Considering the way Vlad barked at him during the previous at-bat, the admiration of his home run, and the location of the pitch, I think the default assumption has to be that it was aimed at his head.

  7. _David_ on September 21st, 2007 6:37 pm

    yet

  8. Dave on September 21st, 2007 6:37 pm

    Why do you advocate hitting a player with a baseball in his back but not his head?

    You can’t die by getting hit in the back with a fastball.

  9. cgmonk on September 21st, 2007 6:44 pm

    So as long as the player doesn’t die it’s fair game? Is it ok to go for the knees or ribs?

  10. jlc on September 21st, 2007 6:50 pm

    9 – One of the reasons umpires don’t issue warnings after the first batter gets hit is that it’s part of baseball to retaliate. When they tried to crack down on hitting batters a few years ago, the number of fights in baseball went up. It’s the only way, especially in the AL to keep a pitcher honest. Each team has to know that if their guy drills someone, they are going to get hit back.

    I don’t have a problem not retaliating if a HBP is purely accidental, but I also don’t have a problem with retaliation in that event. But you can’t let pitchers throw at someone’s head without some kind of punishment, and their own team pressure is more effective than suspensions.

  11. John in L.A. on September 21st, 2007 6:50 pm

    5 – I’m about 30 minutes north of Anaheim and it is raining here.

    4- Do you really not seeing the difference between aiming at the back and aiming at the head? Or are you just being feisty?

    Because that’s like saying “I don’t see how you can advocate spanking your child if you won’t advocate stabbing them.”

    One is tremendously more dangerous than the other.

  12. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 6:51 pm

    9: It might have been if Vince McMahon would’ve ever started an Extreme Baseball League. :|

  13. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 6:52 pm

    Maybe we should make them throw tennis balls??

    It’s baseball, people get hit. Get over it.
    I am with Dave on this one, head is the only no zone. The back is the best place to get hit, well besides the ass I guess.

  14. Teej on September 21st, 2007 6:52 pm

    So as long as the player doesn’t die it’s fair game?

    I don’t think anyone’s condoning throwing at players, but like it or not, it’s a part of baseball. And the code is: If you’re going to hit a guy, you hit him in the back. Even Vlad said after the game:

    “If I’m going to get hit, fine. You can hit me. But if they want to hit me please stay away from my head.”

  15. jlc on September 21st, 2007 6:53 pm

    I like this quote from Wikipedia. I wonder if it’s still true with cameras in every park now.

    “The most common sign the catcher gives, if he or the coach wants to plunk a batter is simply giving the pitcher the middle finger.”

  16. Dave on September 21st, 2007 6:57 pm

    I’ll call BS on that. Throwing at a guy is the pitchers decision – the catcher doesn’t call for it. It may be discussed in the dugout between innings, but since the pitcher is the one who has to deal with the hitter charging the mound and the suspension from the league, it’s almost always his call.

    Pretty much the only exception is if the manager brings in a pitcher for the sole purpose of throwing at a hitter – then, he doesn’t get to decide if he wants to or not. Just ask Sean Tracey.

  17. Joe on September 21st, 2007 6:59 pm

    So the Devil Rays are becoming the Rays in ‘08, and introduced a new logo and uniform. I’m not exactly digging it.

  18. jlc on September 21st, 2007 7:00 pm

    16 – That makes sense to me. That’s why Wikipedia is fun to read and useless for real information.

  19. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 7:00 pm

    17- You win.

  20. Joe on September 21st, 2007 7:01 pm

    I don’t see the upside to throwing at Vlad at this point, though. You’re just asking for Ichiro to get plunked, and possibly hurt, and with the batting title in reach he’s the only player on the M’s who has something meaningful left to play for.

  21. Tek Jansen on September 21st, 2007 7:02 pm

    I was disappointed in Mac’s post-game comments and behavior. At least publicly, he never rebuked Campillo or his actions. When Padilla threw at Swisher, out of his own petty desires, Ron Washington made Padilla apologize to the team for hurting his team and causing a fight. I remember LaRussa also admonishing a pitcher either this year or last for doing the same thing. Is there any hint that Mac took similar steps with Campillo. From my vantage point, Mac seems like an enabler of bad behavior, provided his enabling makes him likeable to his veteran players.

  22. Joe on September 21st, 2007 7:03 pm

    Seriously, I don’t get the new Rays logo. What are they saying? “Help! Our 3rd baseman exploded!” Is this a baseball team, or Spinal Tap?

  23. Ebenezer on September 21st, 2007 7:04 pm

    17 – at least they’re weather appropriate.

    Yankees have pulled to within 4-2 against the Blue Jays, bottom of ninth, two outs, runners on first and third, Cano at bat.

  24. Teej on September 21st, 2007 7:06 pm

    They just tied it, actually.

  25. Ebenezer on September 21st, 2007 7:07 pm

    Blue Jays 4, Yankees 4. Bottom of the ninth, two outs, runners on first and second, Cabrera at bat.

  26. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 7:08 pm

    A manager in baseball bringing in a pitcher for the sole purpose of hitting a batter is the equivalent of a head coach in hockey bringing in the team’s enforcer in the last ten seconds of a losing game just to hurt guys — i.e. thuggery for thuggery’s sake.

  27. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 7:09 pm

    I hope the M’s wins just so the announcers shut up. I hate the Angel guys.

  28. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 7:09 pm

    22: Too funny! :)

  29. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 7:11 pm

    27: Gotta love the unmatched professionalism of Rex “Crime Dog” Hudler…NOT! >:(

  30. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 7:17 pm

    The announcer sounds like a guy in a basement who hacked the FSN feed and puts his own audio in. He is the John McLaren of announcing.

  31. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 7:19 pm

    No way Guillen lets the Angels clinch against him…

  32. timc on September 21st, 2007 7:28 pm

    25 – the stupid Yankees are making me miss the M’s game, which won’t be shown here until the Jays are done.

    I guess it could be the stupid Jays for letting the Yankees tie.

  33. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 7:28 pm

    32 — Guillen has little say in the matter at this point.

    27, 29 — Couldn’t agree more. God these guys are horrible. I thought
    the Mariners announcers sucked. These guys really make me want to
    vomit. Please Mariners get good again in a year or two so I don’t have to
    listen to these guys gloating anymore.

  34. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 7:30 pm

    Dude I got tough hands like O.C. Word.

  35. IdahoInvader on September 21st, 2007 7:31 pm

    If Campillo was going to be so mad at Vlad hitting a hr and taunting him as he did it, maybe he shouldn’t have brushed him back AND THEN throw a batting practice pitch down the pipe.

    I mean what did he honestly think Vlad would do to such a sad down the middle pitch?

  36. (Expletive) Dave Samson on September 21st, 2007 7:35 pm

    I wonder if I can get a Rays t-short with Steve Irwin on it.

  37. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 7:37 pm

    Hudler sounds like a stoned surfer.

  38. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 7:40 pm

    LOL Jose Lopez gave Vidro a look like Damn who is this guy pretending
    to be able to field a defensive position?!

  39. (Expletive) Dave Samson on September 21st, 2007 7:47 pm

    Barry Bonds is leaving the Giants? There has to be room for another DH on our roster, right?

  40. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 7:47 pm

    37: Gah…could you imagine him and Jeff Weaver calling a game together? :)

  41. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 7:49 pm

    Betcha the Angies wind up with Bonds — just so Fox can have an excuse to ram them both down our throats about every other Saturday again next year.

  42. Joe on September 21st, 2007 7:55 pm

    Bonds is really only suited to DH; he has ties to the Bay Area but lives in SoCal. And he’s going to want way more money than he’s worth, so there’s no way the A’s will bite. Hmmm, AL team in SoCal, has been talking about getting a “bopper” for a couple of seasons now, who could that be?

  43. Sports on a Schtick on September 21st, 2007 8:01 pm

    Vidro looked like trash on that at-bat. How about seeing if the hobbled pitcher can actually throw something over the plate?

  44. John in L.A. on September 21st, 2007 8:01 pm

    I hope Beltre hits 100 rbi.

    Because while the difference between 99 and 10 is 1 to most of us… to certain people in the media the difference is about 80 or so.

  45. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:03 pm

    42: Fancy that!

    Again, from Fox’s perspective, it kills two birds with one stone.

  46. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:06 pm

    Neihaus just mentioned that “Washburn has been having problems getting into the seventh inning lately.”

    LATELY, Uncle Dave? Try most of his career!

  47. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 8:07 pm

    This just in, Campillo is no Campolo. Hudler says it, so it’s so.

  48. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 8:07 pm

    no = now dammit

  49. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:09 pm

    We say Campillo and Rex says Campolo…

  50. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:12 pm

    Actually, could we make that two birds with one Stone(man)?

  51. jlc on September 21st, 2007 8:20 pm

    Anyone know Spanish? The Halos Heaven blog is sponsoring the Campillo page at Baseball-Reference.com and left this message there:

    Campillo buscando por la cabeza de Vladimir Guerrero, porque Campillo no tiene cessos.

    I’ve got the la cabeza, but not the rest of it.

  52. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:22 pm

    Well, Rizzy and Uncle Dave are now reminiscing about 2001…guess they’ve “officially” lost interest in this game.

  53. apunetid on September 21st, 2007 8:24 pm

    51: rough translation: Campillos was looking for the head of Vladimir Guerro, because Campillo doesn’t have (cessos?). I don’t know what that last word means.

  54. Sports on a Schtick on September 21st, 2007 8:29 pm

    That was like watching a whale trying to beach itself.

  55. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 8:29 pm

    vidro at first = gold baby, gold

  56. Tek Jansen on September 21st, 2007 8:29 pm

    Boy, Vidro did everything wrong on that play. He came off the bag and still let the ball get by him. Excellent work.

  57. Tek Jansen on September 21st, 2007 8:32 pm

    #52 — Dave lost interest in the season about a week or so ago. During one game he spent a whole inning with Blowers discussing his old summer jobs in South Dakota. Don’t get me wrong, it is quaint and entertaining, but, yeah, he has lost interest.

  58. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:33 pm

    We’ve got a Turbo that’s as big as a whale…

    Wonder if he can set sail?! :o

  59. jlc on September 21st, 2007 8:34 pm

    53 – That’s about what I figured. Thanks.

  60. timc on September 21st, 2007 8:35 pm

    Hey, so is anyone going to tell us what “cessos” means? It’s killing me.

    It’s not that I’ve lost interest in the game, but these damned Yankees and Jays are still going at it and not keeping the M’s off the air.

  61. Pete Livengood on September 21st, 2007 8:36 pm

    Campillo’s only mistake was head-hunting – both times. I can see going up and in on Vlad (though they had also gone up and in on the catcher, I think, which should have ended it) after Weaver plunked Joh. Had he just gone up and in, but not at the head, or even hit Vlad or somebody else, Vlad would have had no cause for showboating on that HR. As it was, he did. Campillo compounded the mistake of head-hunting and not realizing that Vlad’s response was kosher given the location of the pitch, by retaliating again, and again head-hunting while doing it. Complete bush league BS.

    And cgmonk, it is hard to square that you are enough of a baseball fan to have found this site, but not enough to know that there is a place in baseball for plunking a batter. Just do it right. You had to have been kidding.

  62. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:38 pm

    Kudos to the Jays, though, for continuing to battle at least.

    Wish the M’s would’ve done a little more of that about a month ago.

  63. (Expletive) Dave Samson on September 21st, 2007 8:39 pm

    As far as I can tell, cessos comes from the latin root cesso ‘to stop.’ So maybe that Campillo couldn’t follow-through, i.e. was a chicken?

  64. apunetid on September 21st, 2007 8:40 pm

    King Awsome!

  65. jlc on September 21st, 2007 8:40 pm

    61 – Totally agree.

    As for cessos, I think it’s from the same root as cesspool, so you can substitute your own word in there.

    Yea, AB, getting close.

  66. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:42 pm

    Do we maybe get a stay of execution for tonight?

  67. Karen on September 21st, 2007 8:44 pm

    Greg Zaun just hit a solo HR in the top of the 14th for the Jays…

  68. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:45 pm

    Now, Neihaus is talking about the damn rally monkey…AAAHHHH! >:O

  69. vern on September 21st, 2007 8:47 pm

    cessos – most likely balls.

  70. John in L.A. on September 21st, 2007 8:49 pm

    Dang, I can’t believe google is failing on “cessos”.

    I’m starting to think it’s a typo.

    It’s apparently Italian slang for toilet.

    But I don’t see how “He doesn’t have toilets.” makes any sense.

  71. apunetid on September 21st, 2007 8:51 pm

    How about Thompson’s Gameday picture!

  72. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:51 pm

    Guess Scoscia thought that spotting us five runs was enough to mask the fix, so that he can go ahead and rub our nose in a pile of poo tomorrow by clinching on national TV.

  73. Sports on a Schtick on September 21st, 2007 8:54 pm

    Jose Vidro is no J.T. Snow.

  74. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:54 pm

    Another brilliant Gold Glove moment by Turbo…

  75. timc on September 21st, 2007 8:55 pm

    Given that it’s Halo’s Heaven, a typo is not beyond the realm of possibilities.

    Jays have a 1 run lead, one out in the bottom of the 14th. C’mon. Maybe I can catch 2+ innings of the M’s.

  76. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 8:55 pm

    73: Hell, he’s not even a Bone or Edgar at 1B!

  77. jlc on September 21st, 2007 8:56 pm

    70 – That’s exactly the sequence I went through before I posted.

  78. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 8:57 pm

    I would much rather listen to Neihaus than to the sound effect stylings
    of Hudler. “Ka ching” “Come on dudes a couple bloops and a blast”
    “Big Daddy Vlad-y”

    Ugh.

  79. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:00 pm

    Aren’cha just looking SOOOOO forward to hearing ole’ Rex tomorrow as the “special guest” play-by-play “dude” for Fox Saturday Baseball?

    YECCH!

  80. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:04 pm

    Hudler sounds like a stoned surfer.

    sounds like???

    I gather it was pretty open in the clubhouse that no one was happy with Campillo. I’d bet that as he is not a ‘real’ or a future Mariner they wouldn’t treat it as Washington did with Padilla, though

  81. Ebenezer on September 21st, 2007 9:04 pm

    72 – that, and he wanted to wait until McLaren was back.

  82. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 9:05 pm

    79 — Guess I won’t be watching that. Rex is insufferable.

    “Sweet! Gettin some dirt on his belly!”

  83. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:09 pm

    I dunno, it seems it would be more fitting somehow for the Angels to clinch against Jeff Weaver on sunday, with Lackey on the mound, possible striking out Guillen at the end of a CGSO.

  84. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:10 pm

    Go Guillen!

  85. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:12 pm

    83: Good point…since facing Lackey is about as much fun as a friggin’ root canal.

  86. defcon on September 21st, 2007 9:13 pm

    My guess: cessos is probably supposed to be sesos, or brains. The Spanish pronunciation would be the same.

  87. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:13 pm

    Hey! it was Judy & her sister in the outfield! did they have rally fry signs? have they been shown before?

  88. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 9:14 pm

    80 — LMAO — That certainly explains Rexy.
    I’ve never heard someone that irritating and
    unprofessional calling an MLB game.

    Just toke up and go back to the surf shack, Rexy.
    Please. . . .

  89. Karen on September 21st, 2007 9:14 pm

    86. You’re right, defcon. Somebody posted a correction on that Halo site.

  90. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:16 pm

    Neihaus just mentioned the fact that they have a fireworks show after every Friday night home game in Anaheim.

    Guess they had to figure out some way to keep their “loyal” fans from bailing in the seventh inning every game.

  91. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:21 pm

    Judy & Joan are great– they’ve gone to fantasy camp the last few years, and have the bright yellow sign up in the 300 yellow, indicating where “the old bats” sit. glad to see someone traveled to the away game :)

  92. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:21 pm

    80/88: Hmmm…thought he was supposed to be Mr. Straight-Edge-Clean-And-Sober — too funny!

  93. jlc on September 21st, 2007 9:22 pm

    86 and 89 – Thanks. Now I can sleep tonight.

  94. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:25 pm

    88: Then again, he sounds SOOOO flippin’ hyper in that booth sometimes, maybe he feels he needs to do it to relax. :O

  95. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:26 pm

    #92– well, maybe he is now—

  96. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:27 pm

    True…

  97. George_Argyros_Lives on September 21st, 2007 9:32 pm

    The team looks better without JMac.

    How about tomorrow night we go with the “hot hand”, the
    “good luck charm” of the bench coach managing again?!

  98. msb on September 21st, 2007 9:40 pm

    I think the Angels are saving themselves for tomorrow.

  99. scott19 on September 21st, 2007 9:41 pm

    Ha-ha-ha-ha…Stayin’ Alive…Stayin’ Alive…

  100. earinc on September 21st, 2007 9:43 pm

    Did anyone see that Bons is done in SF? Who should go after him as a DH? He’s clearly done in the field, but his numbers are still impressive this year offensively. I’m not saying the M’s should go after him – I don’t think they should, we’re too stacked in the DH/shitty outfielder department, but I bet he helps someone in the AL in ‘08, much as I’m not a fan.

  101. John in L.A. on September 21st, 2007 9:47 pm

    86 – Well done, sir or madam.

  102. poulsbohemian on September 21st, 2007 9:51 pm

    If anyone suggests Bonds going to the M’s, I will hang my head in disgust.

    As for who might end up with him, Oakland would be attractive in terms of locality (but not in dollars). The Angels are another possibility, being near home and a team with good shot at a WS ring. Hmmm… as for anyone else, I don’t know. Would the Yanks be crazy enough to give him a try?

  103. HamNasty on September 21st, 2007 10:00 pm

    Take that you awful awful announcers! My wish came true. See, the Mariners do care.

  104. msb on September 21st, 2007 10:12 pm

    Jerry Crasnick tonight:

    “Where could Bonds wind up? Maybe Texas, Detroit or Oakland can find a way to make things work. If [Bonds' agent Jeff] Borris is a magician, maybe he gets the Yankees or another big-market club to bite. But all those teams had their shot at Bonds last year and gladly passed.

    Borris declined to speculate on whether Bonds might be willing to take a cut from his $15.8 million base salary in 2008. “I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to comment on money,” he said. But the agent discounted the prospect of 3,000 hits as a motivating factor, even though Bonds is a mere 65 hits short.

    “Barry’s had only one goal since his first day in the big leagues, and that’s to win a World Series,” Borris said. “Anybody who knows him knows that he’s all about winning and being a good teammate. That’s it.” “

  105. msb on September 21st, 2007 10:24 pm

    Drayer said that when the press all trooped down to the manager’s office, they weren’t sure if they’d see Goff or McLaren behind the desk in there– and when they went in, it was Boone.

  106. Ebenezer on September 21st, 2007 10:27 pm

    102, 104, the Angels seem like a great fit for Bonds. He can fill in at DH, he won’t be intentionally walked over and over, he gets a shot at Series. I’m sure Beene would also like him and the A’s need to fill holes in their offense, but I don’t know if they want to pay for him. Having him play for the Yankees would make for the best theater (and get a shot at the Ring), if they can fit him in at DH.

  107. earinc on September 21st, 2007 10:46 pm

    I bet the A’s or Rangers land Bonds, and if the A’s sign him, he hits 35 home runs and drives in 100 and Beane is a genius, and if the Rangers sign him, he hits 17, gets injured, and is a bust.

  108. earinc on September 21st, 2007 10:46 pm

    I bet the A’s or Rangers land Bonds, and if the A’s sign him, he hits 35 home runs and drives in 100 and Beane is a genius, and if the Rangers sign him, he hits 17, gets injured, and is a bust.

  109. Ralph Malph on September 22nd, 2007 12:17 am

    Drayer said that when the press all trooped down to the manager’s office, they weren’t sure if they’d see Goff or McLaren behind the desk in there– and when they went in, it was Boone.

    Bret, Aaron or Bob? I assume it wasn’t Ray or Daniel, or Boone Carlyle?

    I’m betting it was billionaire oil man T. Boone Pickens.

  110. scott19 on September 22nd, 2007 12:46 am

    I’m still sticking to my guns and saying the Angies wind up with Bonds…it seems like he’d fit right in with them.

  111. Colm on September 22nd, 2007 1:03 am

    I don’t care.

  112. scott19 on September 22nd, 2007 1:11 am

    To be honest, I really don’t care all that much, either.

    Some idiotic bean counters from Fox who are always on the lookout for “maximized television ratings” ™, however, seem to care a whole lot where Bonds winds up next year…which is why it was brought up on here, I suppose.

  113. Ace on September 22nd, 2007 1:16 am

    I’d love to see Bonds here. Sure he cheated, but he didn’t start it. What’s a player to think when McGuire and Sosa are having their huge roids love fest, the commissioner flying in, all the coverage on all the networks. The people inside baseball all knew what was happening then. The League and the Union repeatedly refused to even make a rule against steroids let alone test for them. So what is a player supposed to think? Obviously Bonds thought that the message was that it was the HR’s that mattered, not the chemicals. Bonds was already a consensus HOF before he started the roids, yeah it should stain his carreer but it shouldn’t obscure his real accomplishments.

  114. scott19 on September 22nd, 2007 1:28 am

    113: No argument here — and I think wherever he lands (except maybe PNC in Pittsburgh or Dodger Stadium), he winds up being a marquee draw.

    Though I’m not bending over backwards to defend the guy, I think it’s pretty much common knowledge that if he were as media-friendly as McGwire or Sosa, you wouldn’t be hearing nearly the amount of trash-talk about Bonds as you do.

  115. scott19 on September 22nd, 2007 1:54 am

    103: Hmmm…I wonder if maybe FSN SoCal/Prime Ticket/Whatever-They’re-Calling-Themselves-These-Days might think about bringing over Marty McSorley from the LA Kings (and occasionally, Anaheim Ducks) broadcast team to do some games for the Angies next year. Sure, he’s never done baseball before, but I bet he wouldn’t be any worse than that bonehead Hudler is.

  116. dw on September 22nd, 2007 7:39 am

    Hey, everyone? The M’s will finish over .500 for the first time since 2003.

    Yeah, the last month has been a historic disaster, but they did finally make it to 82.

    And at the start of the year, I predicted 82 wins. So they exceeded my expectations. Even if they raised my hopes then brutally killed them.

  117. dw on September 22nd, 2007 7:40 am

    Oh, and ESPN mentioned that the M’s were one of the teams who had “shown an interest” in signing Bonds.

    I threw up in my mouth a little when I heard that.

  118. msb on September 22nd, 2007 9:15 am

    IIRC, Bonds mentioned Seattle, not the other way around….

  119. msb on September 22nd, 2007 9:23 am

    I’m betting it was billionaire oil man T. Boone Pickens.

    Bingo! you know what a wag he is.

    I think wherever he lands (except maybe PNC in Pittsburgh or Dodger Stadium), he winds up being a marquee draw.

    why? he wasn’t drawing fans to the see the Giants until it was the last part of the HR chase. Do you think getting to 3000 hits is as glamorous a stat?

    FWIW, Drayer opined that the Angels wouldn’t be in the running, that Moreno is as image-conscious as the Mariners, and seeing how furious he was when he had to stand there at the Matthews’ HGH press conference this spring really makes her doubt his interest in Bonds

  120. msb on September 22nd, 2007 9:32 am

    * not drawing fans to see the Giants on the road, of course, until the chase got close and folks came out to boo :)

  121. ira on September 22nd, 2007 9:33 am

    sessos, or cessos is brains. Campillo apparently doesn’t have any. But then again, McLaren doesn’t seem too either.

  122. John in L.A. on September 22nd, 2007 12:20 pm

    It is raining like crazy down here… I’m skeptical about any game being played today.

  123. jlc on September 22nd, 2007 12:32 pm

    Considering how much weather has played a factor in the M’s season, it seems fitting that they get rained out today, have to play a double header tomorrow, with the Angels clinching in the first game, then the M’s have to go out after the celebration. Sigh.

  124. earinc on September 22nd, 2007 3:28 pm

    112:

    “Some idiotic bean counters from Fox who are always on the lookout for maximized television ratings, however, seem to care a whole lot where Bonds winds up next year…which is why it was brought up on here, I suppose.”

    Actually, I brought it up here because I saw it on the NYTimes.com sports page last night while I was watching the game thread and just wondered what people were thinking (I’m not even a big Bonds fan, it was just a casual comment). Consider me an idiotic fan, but at least I’m not a sanctimonious blowhard.

  125. scott19 on September 22nd, 2007 6:06 pm

    124:

    1) For one thing, the news on Bonds was already mentioned earlier in the thread (starting at #39), and we’d been commenting on it after that.

    2) I was responding in part to the post directly above that one, and didn’t intend it as any kind of a personal attack. Rather, I was expressing my displeasure at Fox and their obvious bias toward large market teams such as the Yanks, Red Sox and Angels.

  126. earinc on September 23rd, 2007 11:57 am

    Fair enough, Scott. I’m no Fox fan, either, and I just took umbrage at being lumped in with them.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.