<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of the weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:00:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242222</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242222</guid>
		<description>#57: Remember though too, if Reed continues to make progress in the minor leagues this year, he could work his way back into the starting outfield in 2009 and prove to be one of those players who just went up and down the minor league several times before staying with the big league club permanently.

So Fukudome would be able to move to DH while Reed would play left or right field. And heck, Fukudome was a decent outfielder in Japan throughout his whole career there anyways.

Lest we forget too that Reed did lead the PCL in hitting this year, so he could end up in an every day lineup still someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#57: Remember though too, if Reed continues to make progress in the minor leagues this year, he could work his way back into the starting outfield in 2009 and prove to be one of those players who just went up and down the minor league several times before staying with the big league club permanently.</p>
<p>So Fukudome would be able to move to DH while Reed would play left or right field. And heck, Fukudome was a decent outfielder in Japan throughout his whole career there anyways.</p>
<p>Lest we forget too that Reed did lead the PCL in hitting this year, so he could end up in an every day lineup still someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242220</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242220</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Don’t buy into this stuff yet, things are still very early&lt;/i&gt;

Note I said &quot;if&quot;... but we&#039;re discussing a team that thinks &quot;Hey, we&#039;re very close to 90 wins!&quot; as opposed to &quot;Hey! Our run differential&#039;s very similar to last year, when we were under .500. Maybe we should rethink this&quot;.

&lt;i&gt;I’m not going to lie though, I’m wondering why any of the Seattle beat writers haven’t talked ONCE about Kosuke Fukudome being a viable possibility for outfield. Because I think he’d be a very successful doubles hitter in this park.&lt;/i&gt;

I think Fukudome is probably a .290/.380/.450 hitter at Safeco- basically Johnny Damon with a few more walks and XBH and less stolen bases.

That being saidm I think it&#039;s going to be VERY hard to pry Raul out of LF if Guillen doesn&#039;t come back, especially with Vidro still being the putative DH, and I don&#039;t see that the team thinks &quot;Hey, Raul and Richie&#039;s defense was a BIIIIG problem&quot;... so Fukudome doesn&#039;t make sense when they aren&#039;t bringing back Guillen to start with (I assume to make big offers to guys like Carlos Silva).

&lt;i&gt;berm - I think that if they offer arbitration, and the player agrees to it, they’re on the hook for whatever the salary outcome is for one year.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s for something like 1/6th the salary, and even if the M&#039;s WON arbitration, he&#039;d still get a raise from what he made last year. You don&#039;t get salary cuts in arbitration on 3/4/5/6 year players- it&#039;s just not designed that way.

There&#039;s really no reason to keep HoRam under team control and making millions, other than a desire to prove Mariner management didn&#039;t screw up another roster decision. It would be better to cut bait and move on to other players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Don’t buy into this stuff yet, things are still very early</i></p>
<p>Note I said &#8220;if&#8221;&#8230; but we&#8217;re discussing a team that thinks &#8220;Hey, we&#8217;re very close to 90 wins!&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;Hey! Our run differential&#8217;s very similar to last year, when we were under .500. Maybe we should rethink this&#8221;.</p>
<p><i>I’m not going to lie though, I’m wondering why any of the Seattle beat writers haven’t talked ONCE about Kosuke Fukudome being a viable possibility for outfield. Because I think he’d be a very successful doubles hitter in this park.</i></p>
<p>I think Fukudome is probably a .290/.380/.450 hitter at Safeco- basically Johnny Damon with a few more walks and XBH and less stolen bases.</p>
<p>That being saidm I think it&#8217;s going to be VERY hard to pry Raul out of LF if Guillen doesn&#8217;t come back, especially with Vidro still being the putative DH, and I don&#8217;t see that the team thinks &#8220;Hey, Raul and Richie&#8217;s defense was a BIIIIG problem&#8221;&#8230; so Fukudome doesn&#8217;t make sense when they aren&#8217;t bringing back Guillen to start with (I assume to make big offers to guys like Carlos Silva).</p>
<p><i>berm &#8211; I think that if they offer arbitration, and the player agrees to it, they’re on the hook for whatever the salary outcome is for one year.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s for something like 1/6th the salary, and even if the M&#8217;s WON arbitration, he&#8217;d still get a raise from what he made last year. You don&#8217;t get salary cuts in arbitration on 3/4/5/6 year players- it&#8217;s just not designed that way.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really no reason to keep HoRam under team control and making millions, other than a desire to prove Mariner management didn&#8217;t screw up another roster decision. It would be better to cut bait and move on to other players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swungonandbelted</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242219</link>
		<dc:creator>Swungonandbelted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242219</guid>
		<description>berm - I think that if they offer arbitration, and the player agrees to it, they&#039;re on the hook for whatever the salary outcome is for one year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>berm &#8211; I think that if they offer arbitration, and the player agrees to it, they&#8217;re on the hook for whatever the salary outcome is for one year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bermanator</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242217</link>
		<dc:creator>bermanator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242217</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He’s arbitration eligible this year, and due to make millions. Keeping him on the roster under THOSE circumstances, especially it’s easy to pick up replacement-level talent, would be silly. &lt;/i&gt;

Can&#039;t they just cut him if he goes to arbitration and they don&#039;t like the award?

Otherwise, I agree that it&#039;s crazy to give him what he&#039;ll earn in arbitration, and I don&#039;t think Seattle will do that. That would be insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He’s arbitration eligible this year, and due to make millions. Keeping him on the roster under THOSE circumstances, especially it’s easy to pick up replacement-level talent, would be silly. </i></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t they just cut him if he goes to arbitration and they don&#8217;t like the award?</p>
<p>Otherwise, I agree that it&#8217;s crazy to give him what he&#8217;ll earn in arbitration, and I don&#8217;t think Seattle will do that. That would be insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242210</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242210</guid>
		<description>#53: Don&#039;t buy into this stuff yet, things are still very early. I&#039;m not going to lie though, I&#039;m wondering why any of the Seattle beat writers haven&#039;t talked ONCE about Kosuke Fukudome being a viable possibility for outfield. Because I think he&#039;d be a very successful doubles hitter in this park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#53: Don&#8217;t buy into this stuff yet, things are still very early. I&#8217;m not going to lie though, I&#8217;m wondering why any of the Seattle beat writers haven&#8217;t talked ONCE about Kosuke Fukudome being a viable possibility for outfield. Because I think he&#8217;d be a very successful doubles hitter in this park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242208</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242208</guid>
		<description>HoRam is fine as a spring training non-roster invite who you can send down to Tacoma when he sucks, and only making MLB minimums.

He&#039;s arbitration eligible this year, and due to make millions. Keeping him on the roster under THOSE circumstances, especially it&#039;s easy to pick up replacement-level talent, would be silly. The M&#039;s should decline arbitration and say &quot;You&#039;re welcome to come to spring training if you can&#039;t find other work&quot;. Let some other team guarantee a bigtime salary.

Also, from LaRue&#039;s article:

&lt;i&gt;They already have their outfield tentatively set for next year – Raul Ibañez, Ichiro Suzuki and Adam Jones. And with Richie Sexson still a one-man logjam at first base, the team will likely try to find at-bats for Ben Broussard in the outfield.

Then there’s rookie Wladimir Balentien knocking on the door from Tacoma.

Guillen did everything Seattle could have asked, and it’s tough seeing a left-handed bat leave the Mariners’ lineup. It just doesn’t seem to be a fit for 2008 and beyond.&lt;/i&gt;

Two comments:

- If this is the Mariner thinking for the offseason, it has FAIL stamped all over it. Raul and Broussard as outfielders? Sexson as the primary 1B? Aaaaargh.

- Shouldn&#039;t the beat writer for the team be able to figure out one of the team&#039;s best hitters and potential free agents is a right-handed batter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HoRam is fine as a spring training non-roster invite who you can send down to Tacoma when he sucks, and only making MLB minimums.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s arbitration eligible this year, and due to make millions. Keeping him on the roster under THOSE circumstances, especially it&#8217;s easy to pick up replacement-level talent, would be silly. The M&#8217;s should decline arbitration and say &#8220;You&#8217;re welcome to come to spring training if you can&#8217;t find other work&#8221;. Let some other team guarantee a bigtime salary.</p>
<p>Also, from LaRue&#8217;s article:</p>
<p><i>They already have their outfield tentatively set for next year – Raul Ibañez, Ichiro Suzuki and Adam Jones. And with Richie Sexson still a one-man logjam at first base, the team will likely try to find at-bats for Ben Broussard in the outfield.</p>
<p>Then there’s rookie Wladimir Balentien knocking on the door from Tacoma.</p>
<p>Guillen did everything Seattle could have asked, and it’s tough seeing a left-handed bat leave the Mariners’ lineup. It just doesn’t seem to be a fit for 2008 and beyond.</i></p>
<p>Two comments:</p>
<p>- If this is the Mariner thinking for the offseason, it has FAIL stamped all over it. Raul and Broussard as outfielders? Sexson as the primary 1B? Aaaaargh.</p>
<p>- Shouldn&#8217;t the beat writer for the team be able to figure out one of the team&#8217;s best hitters and potential free agents is a right-handed batter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242196</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242196</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.komoradio.com/marinersradio/shannon/10857521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Drayer&lt;/a&gt; (with a few self-described catty moments) blogs about where Alex might end up today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.komoradio.com/marinersradio/shannon/10857521.html" rel="nofollow">Drayer</a> (with a few self-described catty moments) blogs about where Alex might end up today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-2/#comment-242193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242193</guid>
		<description>Why do people think A-Rod will be a Cub? See past Piniella, the major market and the image to reality.

Unless the Cubs get their ownership situation straightened out in a hurry — with owners who have all sorts of money to burn right out of the gate — they&#039;ll largely be sitting out the free-agent offseason, I would think. 

I think there&#039;s a fair chance, actually, that NOBODY signs him. On Boras&#039; stated terms, anyway. It won&#039;t be collusion as much as a gun-shy offseason in which there&#039;s nobody else to artificially lift up the market — no Barry Zitos or Alfonos Sorianos or Carlos Lees.

I wonder if Larry LaRue was okay with letting Carlos Guillen go for nothing? Or Jeremy Reed, the major haul from the Freddy Garcia trade? Maybe hanging on to Jeff Cirillo for a few more seasons would have eased the sting from seeing Brian Fuentes pitch in the postseason. &quot;History of winning&quot; ... Jesus wept, Makes one despair if people will EVER see past pitching wins and losses to what really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people think A-Rod will be a Cub? See past Piniella, the major market and the image to reality.</p>
<p>Unless the Cubs get their ownership situation straightened out in a hurry — with owners who have all sorts of money to burn right out of the gate — they&#8217;ll largely be sitting out the free-agent offseason, I would think. </p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a fair chance, actually, that NOBODY signs him. On Boras&#8217; stated terms, anyway. It won&#8217;t be collusion as much as a gun-shy offseason in which there&#8217;s nobody else to artificially lift up the market — no Barry Zitos or Alfonos Sorianos or Carlos Lees.</p>
<p>I wonder if Larry LaRue was okay with letting Carlos Guillen go for nothing? Or Jeremy Reed, the major haul from the Freddy Garcia trade? Maybe hanging on to Jeff Cirillo for a few more seasons would have eased the sting from seeing Brian Fuentes pitch in the postseason. &#8220;History of winning&#8221; &#8230; Jesus wept, Makes one despair if people will EVER see past pitching wins and losses to what really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-242192</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242192</guid>
		<description>#47: see comment #14 in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/15/another-gm-walks-away/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;.  I know he&#039;s gone into greater detail (more than once) in other threads I can&#039;t find at the moment.  I don&#039;t want to put words into Dave&#039;s mouth, but I think I characterized his opinion accurately.

WRT the ownership question, as #48 notes Lincoln and Armstrong are not owners.  If you think the Seattle situation is undesirable, just imagine working for Angelos, or Steinbrenner until recently, or or Vince Naimoli when he controlled the Rays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#47: see comment #14 in <a href="http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/15/another-gm-walks-away/" rel="nofollow">this thread</a>.  I know he&#8217;s gone into greater detail (more than once) in other threads I can&#8217;t find at the moment.  I don&#8217;t want to put words into Dave&#8217;s mouth, but I think I characterized his opinion accurately.</p>
<p>WRT the ownership question, as #48 notes Lincoln and Armstrong are not owners.  If you think the Seattle situation is undesirable, just imagine working for Angelos, or Steinbrenner until recently, or or Vince Naimoli when he controlled the Rays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bermanator</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-242183</link>
		<dc:creator>bermanator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/10/28/news-of-the-weekend/#comment-242183</guid>
		<description>LaRue writes:

&lt;i&gt;But the real reason Ramirez is still here is that he’s a living, breathing pitcher with a history of winning.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, the real reason he&#039;s still here is because Seattle doesn&#039;t have another productive body to make it worthwhile to boot him off the 40-man, which is a pretty damning indictment of the front office. 

I love how LaRue argues that Seattle can&#039;t let him go for nothing, as though teams will be lining up to offer something for him if the M&#039;s let it slip that he&#039;s on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaRue writes:</p>
<p><i>But the real reason Ramirez is still here is that he’s a living, breathing pitcher with a history of winning.</i></p>
<p>Well, the real reason he&#8217;s still here is because Seattle doesn&#8217;t have another productive body to make it worthwhile to boot him off the 40-man, which is a pretty damning indictment of the front office. </p>
<p>I love how LaRue argues that Seattle can&#8217;t let him go for nothing, as though teams will be lining up to offer something for him if the M&#8217;s let it slip that he&#8217;s on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
