<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triunfel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: philosofool</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294847</link>
		<dc:creator>philosofool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294847</guid>
		<description>My understanding of the difference between 3B and the middle infield was that a 3B usually just has to shift left or just a little right to make a play, whereas both 2B and SS have to be ready to move either way laterally to make plays. So, agility wise, 3B takes less than the middle infield.  3B also needs to be able to field the bunt, but while this requires a little speed, it&#039;s not as demanding as the ability to make plays on hard grounders and line drives.

The frequency with which the position has to make a play matters too. I&#039;m pretty sure fewer plays go to 3B than the middle infield. In general, the more plays a position player has to make, the more important making plays at the position becomes.

What a 3B does need is an arm; he has to be able to make the long throw to first accurately. Of course, so does a SS (if not quite as much.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the difference between 3B and the middle infield was that a 3B usually just has to shift left or just a little right to make a play, whereas both 2B and SS have to be ready to move either way laterally to make plays. So, agility wise, 3B takes less than the middle infield.  3B also needs to be able to field the bunt, but while this requires a little speed, it&#8217;s not as demanding as the ability to make plays on hard grounders and line drives.</p>
<p>The frequency with which the position has to make a play matters too. I&#8217;m pretty sure fewer plays go to 3B than the middle infield. In general, the more plays a position player has to make, the more important making plays at the position becomes.</p>
<p>What a 3B does need is an arm; he has to be able to make the long throw to first accurately. Of course, so does a SS (if not quite as much.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D.</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294740</link>
		<dc:creator>John D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294740</guid>
		<description>Re:  # 45

&lt;em&gt;I think its unfair to judge his [Triunfel&#039;s] 
defensive]performance by his error count.&lt;/em&gt;

So do I. Carlos Guillen had an extremely high error count in the minors; but smart scouts discounted this, knowing that the condition of minor league fields may have had an influence on the error totals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  # 45</p>
<p><em>I think its unfair to judge his [Triunfel's]<br />
defensive]performance by his error count.</em></p>
<p>So do I. Carlos Guillen had an extremely high error count in the minors; but smart scouts discounted this, knowing that the condition of minor league fields may have had an influence on the error totals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan R.</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294527</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294527</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s been mentioned yet, but Gomez over at Lookout Landing posts a daily &quot;Minor League Wrap-Up&quot; that details the progress of notable players in the M&#039;s system, all the way down. 

I don&#039;t mean to re-direct visitors away from USSM, but it&#039;s one of the most appealing regular features of LL, in my opinion. 

Here&#039;s the most recent: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2008/8/4/586638/8-3-minor-league-wrap-up&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8/3 Minor League Wrap-Up&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s been mentioned yet, but Gomez over at Lookout Landing posts a daily &#8220;Minor League Wrap-Up&#8221; that details the progress of notable players in the M&#8217;s system, all the way down. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to re-direct visitors away from USSM, but it&#8217;s one of the most appealing regular features of LL, in my opinion. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the most recent: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2008/8/4/586638/8-3-minor-league-wrap-up" rel="nofollow">8/3 Minor League Wrap-Up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottiedawg</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294526</link>
		<dc:creator>scottiedawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294526</guid>
		<description>Some teams know when to cut their losses and play for the future.  And some teams are able to properly value the team that they currently have.  Our Mariners aren&#039;t terribly good at either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some teams know when to cut their losses and play for the future.  And some teams are able to properly value the team that they currently have.  Our Mariners aren&#8217;t terribly good at either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abender20</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294525</link>
		<dc:creator>abender20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294525</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;we could tolerate losing for the next 2 or 3 years if we see that the Mariners are headed in the right direction&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely. In fact, I&#039;d RATHER see the team struggle for two years if we have definitive proof that the farm system is being built up in depth and quality thanks to a competent front office. If this team goes out in the offseason and overpays for a bunch of bandaids on the downside of their careers, I wouldn&#039;t be able to tolerate an 80 win season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>we could tolerate losing for the next 2 or 3 years if we see that the Mariners are headed in the right direction</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely. In fact, I&#8217;d RATHER see the team struggle for two years if we have definitive proof that the farm system is being built up in depth and quality thanks to a competent front office. If this team goes out in the offseason and overpays for a bunch of bandaids on the downside of their careers, I wouldn&#8217;t be able to tolerate an 80 win season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TumwaterMike</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294524</link>
		<dc:creator>TumwaterMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294524</guid>
		<description>I probably speak for a lot of fans and say we could tolerate losing for the next 2 or 3 years if we see that the Mariners are headed in the right direction.  What I don&#039;t want to see is the Pittsburg Pirates who never seem to get the right pieces together at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably speak for a lot of fans and say we could tolerate losing for the next 2 or 3 years if we see that the Mariners are headed in the right direction.  What I don&#8217;t want to see is the Pittsburg Pirates who never seem to get the right pieces together at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottiedawg</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294523</link>
		<dc:creator>scottiedawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294523</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget Neftali Feliz who came over in the Tex trade and is lights out at AA right now.  It&#039;s looking like he&#039;ll add more value to Texas than Salty, Harrison, Andrus, or Beau Jones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Neftali Feliz who came over in the Tex trade and is lights out at AA right now.  It&#8217;s looking like he&#8217;ll add more value to Texas than Salty, Harrison, Andrus, or Beau Jones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abender20</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294522</link>
		<dc:creator>abender20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294522</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree with cdowley. In terms of a fair comparison of trades, let&#039;s say that the M&#039;s trade Bedard this offseason. The Braves got one year of Teixera for 4 prospects, none of whom have really made an impact at the major league level. 
However, both Salty and Andrus are supposed to be good players at some point. Teixera performed up to expectations for the year he was in Atlanta. Their failings were not his fault. 

The Mariners, after one year of Bedard (fast forward to October), have so far given up a very solid closer, a solid MLB level player who will only continue to improve, and then the unknown quantities of Tillman/Mickololio/Butler. Tillman at least looks like he could be a good starter in the bigs. 

Bedard has not performed up to expectations. The price paid by the organization was for a Cy Young caliber performance, say top 5 in voting or something. Bedard has pitched decently when he has pitched, but he couldn&#039;t go deep into games and has mostly been injured as well as frosty in the clubhouse/media. Who knows what the M&#039;s could get in return for Bedard, but the shine is likely off his nickel, so to speak. If only the Rays would part with some of their absurd talent, but they wont.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree with cdowley. In terms of a fair comparison of trades, let&#8217;s say that the M&#8217;s trade Bedard this offseason. The Braves got one year of Teixera for 4 prospects, none of whom have really made an impact at the major league level.<br />
However, both Salty and Andrus are supposed to be good players at some point. Teixera performed up to expectations for the year he was in Atlanta. Their failings were not his fault. </p>
<p>The Mariners, after one year of Bedard (fast forward to October), have so far given up a very solid closer, a solid MLB level player who will only continue to improve, and then the unknown quantities of Tillman/Mickololio/Butler. Tillman at least looks like he could be a good starter in the bigs. </p>
<p>Bedard has not performed up to expectations. The price paid by the organization was for a Cy Young caliber performance, say top 5 in voting or something. Bedard has pitched decently when he has pitched, but he couldn&#8217;t go deep into games and has mostly been injured as well as frosty in the clubhouse/media. Who knows what the M&#8217;s could get in return for Bedard, but the shine is likely off his nickel, so to speak. If only the Rays would part with some of their absurd talent, but they wont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdowley</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-2/#comment-294521</link>
		<dc:creator>cdowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294521</guid>
		<description>First, I didn&#039;t say &quot;the&quot;, I said &quot;one of&quot;.

Second, I&#039;m not sure I would necessarily say that the Tex trade is up there on that list.  Yeah, the Braves look like they gave up a lot.  Yeah, they wound up missing the playoffs.  However, the Braves missing the playoffs was hardly Tex&#039;s fault.  He filled a huge hole in their lineup that had been made worse by Andruw Jones&#039; abrupt decline, and proceeded to lead the team in virtually every offensive category after he was acquired.  What killed them was the pitching staff falling apart in August.

They certainly didn&#039;t get what they gave for him when they traded him to the Angels, and from that perspective you *could* call the trade a failure, but from a production and results standpoint, I wouldn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I didn&#8217;t say &#8220;the&#8221;, I said &#8220;one of&#8221;.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m not sure I would necessarily say that the Tex trade is up there on that list.  Yeah, the Braves look like they gave up a lot.  Yeah, they wound up missing the playoffs.  However, the Braves missing the playoffs was hardly Tex&#8217;s fault.  He filled a huge hole in their lineup that had been made worse by Andruw Jones&#8217; abrupt decline, and proceeded to lead the team in virtually every offensive category after he was acquired.  What killed them was the pitching staff falling apart in August.</p>
<p>They certainly didn&#8217;t get what they gave for him when they traded him to the Angels, and from that perspective you *could* call the trade a failure, but from a production and results standpoint, I wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc w</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/04/triunfel/comment-page-1/#comment-294520</link>
		<dc:creator>marc w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5707#comment-294520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m into hyperbole more than anyone in the universe, but &#039;worst trade of all time?&#039;   Let&#039;s give it a while.   
If we&#039;re evaluating it purely on a results basis, it&#039;s pretty bad so far, but you could argue that the Teixeira for Perez/Salty/Ramirez/Andrus is worse, and that was just a year ago.   
If you&#039;re looking at it from an &#039;at the time of the trade&#039; POV, it never really looked good, but it&#039;s clearly not a &#039;worst of all time&#039; sort of move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m into hyperbole more than anyone in the universe, but &#8216;worst trade of all time?&#8217;   Let&#8217;s give it a while.<br />
If we&#8217;re evaluating it purely on a results basis, it&#8217;s pretty bad so far, but you could argue that the Teixeira for Perez/Salty/Ramirez/Andrus is worse, and that was just a year ago.<br />
If you&#8217;re looking at it from an &#8216;at the time of the trade&#8217; POV, it never really looked good, but it&#8217;s clearly not a &#8216;worst of all time&#8217; sort of move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
