<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Overlooked Organizational Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: notanangrygradstudent</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298666</link>
		<dc:creator>notanangrygradstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298666</guid>
		<description>If it can be learned but not taught, then organizational philosophy is irrelevant, isn&#039;t it?  You either learn it or you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it can be learned but not taught, then organizational philosophy is irrelevant, isn&#8217;t it?  You either learn it or you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pygmalion</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298664</link>
		<dc:creator>pygmalion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298664</guid>
		<description>First, I didn&#039;t claim that discipline could be *taught*, but that it could be *learned.*  Second, there are plenty of players who have developed increased walk rates as they have aged; which is the best proof I can find of this.  

Or were you looking for proof that it happens in general?  I certainly didn&#039;t claim that.  I claimed that players *can* develop this skill.  And it isn&#039;t hard to find some players who actually have done so.  Here is one: Richie Sexson is an example of a player whose walk rate increased throughout much of his career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I didn&#8217;t claim that discipline could be *taught*, but that it could be *learned.*  Second, there are plenty of players who have developed increased walk rates as they have aged; which is the best proof I can find of this.  </p>
<p>Or were you looking for proof that it happens in general?  I certainly didn&#8217;t claim that.  I claimed that players *can* develop this skill.  And it isn&#8217;t hard to find some players who actually have done so.  Here is one: Richie Sexson is an example of a player whose walk rate increased throughout much of his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notanangrygradstudent</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298627</link>
		<dc:creator>notanangrygradstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298627</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is completely false that discipline cannot be developed or learned. If this were true, then plate discipline would not be considered an “old player” skill. In fact, both power and patience are skills that players can develop as they age.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Plate discipline is considered an &quot;old player&quot; skill because is does not decline with age the way other skills do, not necessarily because it can be &lt;em&gt;taught&lt;/em&gt; to older players.  If you have objective evidence that plate discipline can be taught at the professional level, please cite it.  I&#039;m not saying you are wrong.  I am just repeating conventional wisdom that appeared in the most famous baseball book ever and is frequently repeated in sabrmetric discussions.  I&#039;d love to see actual evidence to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is completely false that discipline cannot be developed or learned. If this were true, then plate discipline would not be considered an “old player” skill. In fact, both power and patience are skills that players can develop as they age.</p></blockquote>
<p>Plate discipline is considered an &#8220;old player&#8221; skill because is does not decline with age the way other skills do, not necessarily because it can be <em>taught</em> to older players.  If you have objective evidence that plate discipline can be taught at the professional level, please cite it.  I&#8217;m not saying you are wrong.  I am just repeating conventional wisdom that appeared in the most famous baseball book ever and is frequently repeated in sabrmetric discussions.  I&#8217;d love to see actual evidence to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298622</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298622</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I don’t understand why this is controversial, by the way. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to anyone in the 21st Century.

But this team seems adamant on keeping their Stone Age tools. They&#039;re ignoring why they had the success they had in 2001; in fact, they seem to be doing the exact opposite of what made them so successful in 2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I don’t understand why this is controversial, by the way. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not to anyone in the 21st Century.</p>
<p>But this team seems adamant on keeping their Stone Age tools. They&#8217;re ignoring why they had the success they had in 2001; in fact, they seem to be doing the exact opposite of what made them so successful in 2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breadbaker</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298609</link>
		<dc:creator>Breadbaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298609</guid>
		<description>I always considered the greatest irony was that Hargrove was advocating with the hitters exactly the opposite of what had made him an effective player.  He was quoted as telling the players that they should expect only one good pitch per at-bat, and they&#039;d better swing at it.  Yet Hargrove as a hitter was a guy who made it so difficult for pitchers to pitch to him they&#039;d offer him up stuff just to get him to swing.  

In 2001, Lou finally came around to the idea that selective hitters would wear down the opponent&#039;s pitchers, after watching the Yankees do that to his pitchers.  No team can survive getting five innings out of its starters night in and night out, and one way to get the starters out is to waste a lot of pitches and take a lot of pitches.  

The 2008 Mariners are the perfect example of that, of course, with our starters typically in the 80s after four innings, while the other team&#039;s starter has barely broken a sweat.  I don&#039;t understand why this is controversial, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always considered the greatest irony was that Hargrove was advocating with the hitters exactly the opposite of what had made him an effective player.  He was quoted as telling the players that they should expect only one good pitch per at-bat, and they&#8217;d better swing at it.  Yet Hargrove as a hitter was a guy who made it so difficult for pitchers to pitch to him they&#8217;d offer him up stuff just to get him to swing.  </p>
<p>In 2001, Lou finally came around to the idea that selective hitters would wear down the opponent&#8217;s pitchers, after watching the Yankees do that to his pitchers.  No team can survive getting five innings out of its starters night in and night out, and one way to get the starters out is to waste a lot of pitches and take a lot of pitches.  </p>
<p>The 2008 Mariners are the perfect example of that, of course, with our starters typically in the 80s after four innings, while the other team&#8217;s starter has barely broken a sweat.  I don&#8217;t understand why this is controversial, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMHawkins</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298599</link>
		<dc:creator>JMHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Mariners also need more bobblehead promotions. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

If they hadn&#039;t promoted so many bobbleheads in this organization already, we might not be looking at another last place finish.

Ba-dum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Mariners also need more bobblehead promotions. </p></blockquote>
<p>If they hadn&#8217;t promoted so many bobbleheads in this organization already, we might not be looking at another last place finish.</p>
<p>Ba-dum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diderot</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298592</link>
		<dc:creator>diderot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298592</guid>
		<description>For this argument to be better explored, as Marc W suggests, we need a much larger sample size than, &#039;the A’s used to have a policy that they wouldn’t promote a prospect from one minor league level to the next unless he had a walk rate of at least 10%&#039;.  That&#039;s as limiting as suggesting that a team should always sign players with low walk rates because Vladdy is so good.
I&#039;m not arguing with the conclusion, just wondering if there&#039;s a way to apply this to, say, the top five hitting prospects in every organization.
I recall the old quote applied to prospects from the D.R.--&#039;no one ever walked off the island.&#039;  Might this be true for foreign prospects in general, an area where the M&#039;s have been relatively successful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For this argument to be better explored, as Marc W suggests, we need a much larger sample size than, &#8216;the A’s used to have a policy that they wouldn’t promote a prospect from one minor league level to the next unless he had a walk rate of at least 10%&#8217;.  That&#8217;s as limiting as suggesting that a team should always sign players with low walk rates because Vladdy is so good.<br />
I&#8217;m not arguing with the conclusion, just wondering if there&#8217;s a way to apply this to, say, the top five hitting prospects in every organization.<br />
I recall the old quote applied to prospects from the D.R.&#8211;&#8217;no one ever walked off the island.&#8217;  Might this be true for foreign prospects in general, an area where the M&#8217;s have been relatively successful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298587</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298587</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; It is completely false that discipline cannot be developed or learned. If this were true, then plate discipline would not be considered an “old player” skill. In fact, both power and patience are skills that players can develop as they age.
What people are confusing is the difference between “developing patience hitting” and “developing into a patient hitter.” Jose Lopez will never be a patient hitter. That doesn’t imply that he cannot become more patient than he currently is. To me it looks like the problem with the Mariners is that they both (a) choose hitters who aren’t likely to develop into patient hitters and (b) don’t attempt to develop these hitters’ patience. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, good point. I think I&#039;ll steal it for my own.

&lt;blockquote&gt;  The question of whether “they” is vaguer than “he” as a pronoun referring to persons of both sexes depends on whether you care more about *number* or about *gender.* Both are vague, but they are vague in different ways. “They” obliterates the distinction between singular and plural. “He” confuses that between masculine and feminine. “It” suggests that what is referred to is sexless, lifeless, or non-human. (A little bit like the verb aru in Japanese). &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yuppers.

&lt;blockquote&gt; I seriously wonder if this isn’t an organizational philosophy built around: A) An old-school belief in batting average as the most critical offensive stat and; B) A foolish attempt to play a “more exciting brand of baseball.” It seems so consistent up and down the entire organization you have to believe they really want free-swinging players, if not for the reasons I’m imagining then for some other equally misguided purpose. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hrm. More the former than the latter, I think. I don&#039;t think they&#039;re foolish enough to mix marketing aims with baseball aims at such a basic level. I think it&#039;s truer that they think aggressive players put pressure on a pitcher...and I think I&#039;ve read that they truly think they can teach patience at the major leauge level...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> It is completely false that discipline cannot be developed or learned. If this were true, then plate discipline would not be considered an “old player” skill. In fact, both power and patience are skills that players can develop as they age.<br />
What people are confusing is the difference between “developing patience hitting” and “developing into a patient hitter.” Jose Lopez will never be a patient hitter. That doesn’t imply that he cannot become more patient than he currently is. To me it looks like the problem with the Mariners is that they both (a) choose hitters who aren’t likely to develop into patient hitters and (b) don’t attempt to develop these hitters’ patience. </p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, good point. I think I&#8217;ll steal it for my own.</p>
<blockquote><p>  The question of whether “they” is vaguer than “he” as a pronoun referring to persons of both sexes depends on whether you care more about *number* or about *gender.* Both are vague, but they are vague in different ways. “They” obliterates the distinction between singular and plural. “He” confuses that between masculine and feminine. “It” suggests that what is referred to is sexless, lifeless, or non-human. (A little bit like the verb aru in Japanese). </p></blockquote>
<p>Yuppers.</p>
<blockquote><p> I seriously wonder if this isn’t an organizational philosophy built around: A) An old-school belief in batting average as the most critical offensive stat and; B) A foolish attempt to play a “more exciting brand of baseball.” It seems so consistent up and down the entire organization you have to believe they really want free-swinging players, if not for the reasons I’m imagining then for some other equally misguided purpose. </p></blockquote>
<p>Hrm. More the former than the latter, I think. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re foolish enough to mix marketing aims with baseball aims at such a basic level. I think it&#8217;s truer that they think aggressive players put pressure on a pitcher&#8230;and I think I&#8217;ve read that they truly think they can teach patience at the major leauge level&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotWilly</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298586</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotWilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298586</guid>
		<description>I seriously wonder if this isn&#039;t an organizational philosophy built around: A) An old-school belief in batting average as the most critical offensive stat and; B) A foolish attempt to play a &quot;more exciting brand of baseball.&quot;  It seems so consistent up and down the entire organization you have to believe they really want free-swinging players, if not for the reasons I&#039;m imagining then for some other equally misguided purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously wonder if this isn&#8217;t an organizational philosophy built around: A) An old-school belief in batting average as the most critical offensive stat and; B) A foolish attempt to play a &#8220;more exciting brand of baseball.&#8221;  It seems so consistent up and down the entire organization you have to believe they really want free-swinging players, if not for the reasons I&#8217;m imagining then for some other equally misguided purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: great gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/08/28/the-overlooked-organizational-issue/comment-page-2/#comment-298585</link>
		<dc:creator>great gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5925#comment-298585</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What people are confusing is the difference between “developing patience hitting” and “developing into a patient hitter.”&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Yes, my mistake.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Jose Lopez will never be a patient hitter. That doesn’t imply that he cannot become more patient than he currently is.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Excellent example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What people are confusing is the difference between “developing patience hitting” and “developing into a patient hitter.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, my mistake.</p>
<blockquote><p>Jose Lopez will never be a patient hitter. That doesn’t imply that he cannot become more patient than he currently is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
