<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just For Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:17:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Ancient Mariner</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-2/#comment-306340</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ancient Mariner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306340</guid>
		<description>Making him &quot;the 2nd or at worst 3rd best offensive player on every team,&quot; even if it were true (which it isn&#039;t -- that&#039;s on an &lt;i&gt;average&lt;/i&gt; team), when he&#039;s also one of the least valuable players in the league with a glove on his hand, makes him a below-average player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making him &#8220;the 2nd or at worst 3rd best offensive player on every team,&#8221; even if it were true (which it isn&#8217;t &#8212; that&#8217;s on an <i>average</i> team), when he&#8217;s also one of the least valuable players in the league with a glove on his hand, makes him a below-average player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopilots70</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-2/#comment-306336</link>
		<dc:creator>gopilots70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306336</guid>
		<description>Dave, actually I am quite flattered with your in-depth response to my ranting.  I agree with you on most points, especially defense, but offensively you really reinforced my point...you wrote:From 2006 to 2008, Ibanez ranks 36th in the majors in home runs and 48th in slugging percentage. Even if you just compare to outfielders, he ranks 14th and 23rd. Do you think home runs and slugging percentage are esoteric numbers.
In my mind, since there are 30 mlb teams and 90 starting outfielders that makes Raul the top offensive outfielder on more than half of the teams.  Ranking 48th overall in slugging would place him as the 2nd or at worst 3rd best offensive player on every team.  That is not below average, that makes him a top offensive player on nearly every team.

Your point about the money referred to players that the M&#039;s have signed or wanted to...I referenced people who have worked and succeeded in the business and that does not include Bill Bavasi.  Thanks for your comment and the great site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, actually I am quite flattered with your in-depth response to my ranting.  I agree with you on most points, especially defense, but offensively you really reinforced my point&#8230;you wrote:From 2006 to 2008, Ibanez ranks 36th in the majors in home runs and 48th in slugging percentage. Even if you just compare to outfielders, he ranks 14th and 23rd. Do you think home runs and slugging percentage are esoteric numbers.<br />
In my mind, since there are 30 mlb teams and 90 starting outfielders that makes Raul the top offensive outfielder on more than half of the teams.  Ranking 48th overall in slugging would place him as the 2nd or at worst 3rd best offensive player on every team.  That is not below average, that makes him a top offensive player on nearly every team.</p>
<p>Your point about the money referred to players that the M&#8217;s have signed or wanted to&#8230;I referenced people who have worked and succeeded in the business and that does not include Bill Bavasi.  Thanks for your comment and the great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306257</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, the imagery of players as food is sooo much better. Fantastic. Felix as an underpriced porterhouse steak, and Ichiro as a priced-just-right filet mignon sounds yummy.&lt;/i&gt;

Starters are salads: occasionally you have one that can be a full meal in itself, but usually you have to follow it up with something else (and occasionally their dressing or something goes bad and ruins the rest of the meal, no how much the other dishes try to make up for it.  Carlos Silva: bad mayonnaise).  A great closer is a fine dessert; the setup men are the cheese course (several varieties, some of them goat or otherwise so stinky they can ruin what had, up to then, been a great meal).  Swingmen are fruit: as a salad they can start the meal, or you can have them towards the end, just before dessert.

And even the best dish goes bad eventually.  You want to eat it, or throw it out, before it&#039;s past its prime.

...You know, if my only contribution to the advancement of sane and enjoyable baseball discussions is an alternative metaphor for describing rosters, I&#039;ll die a happy man.

Heck, for how much The BOOK has improved my understanding of baseball and thus increased my enjoyment of it, I&#039;m just happy I could offer Tango some small amusement in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However, the imagery of players as food is sooo much better. Fantastic. Felix as an underpriced porterhouse steak, and Ichiro as a priced-just-right filet mignon sounds yummy.</i></p>
<p>Starters are salads: occasionally you have one that can be a full meal in itself, but usually you have to follow it up with something else (and occasionally their dressing or something goes bad and ruins the rest of the meal, no how much the other dishes try to make up for it.  Carlos Silva: bad mayonnaise).  A great closer is a fine dessert; the setup men are the cheese course (several varieties, some of them goat or otherwise so stinky they can ruin what had, up to then, been a great meal).  Swingmen are fruit: as a salad they can start the meal, or you can have them towards the end, just before dessert.</p>
<p>And even the best dish goes bad eventually.  You want to eat it, or throw it out, before it&#8217;s past its prime.</p>
<p>&#8230;You know, if my only contribution to the advancement of sane and enjoyable baseball discussions is an alternative metaphor for describing rosters, I&#8217;ll die a happy man.</p>
<p>Heck, for how much The BOOK has improved my understanding of baseball and thus increased my enjoyment of it, I&#8217;m just happy I could offer Tango some small amusement in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306252</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306252</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the long term value of Raul: even if they re-signed him for a couple of years, he&#039;s unlikely to be here when the team next goes deep into the post-season, but the draft picks the team gets in compensation for him very well might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the long term value of Raul: even if they re-signed him for a couple of years, he&#8217;s unlikely to be here when the team next goes deep into the post-season, but the draft picks the team gets in compensation for him very well might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ancient Mariner</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306239</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ancient Mariner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306239</guid>
		<description>wabbles:  Wrong.  Since Zduriencik has said that right now, Grand Branyan&#039;s our starting 1B, that means that as of this point, he&#039;s replaced &lt;i&gt;Bryan LaHair&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; bat in the lineup.  Raúl&#039;s bat, as of now, hasn&#039;t been replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wabbles:  Wrong.  Since Zduriencik has said that right now, Grand Branyan&#8217;s our starting 1B, that means that as of this point, he&#8217;s replaced <i>Bryan LaHair&#8217;s</i> bat in the lineup.  Raúl&#8217;s bat, as of now, hasn&#8217;t been replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306234</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;To list Raul as a below average player when people who have actually worked and succeeded in the business appear willing to give him two to three years at at least eight million a year makes it seem to me that you have fallen in love with some esoteric statistical analysis.&lt;/em&gt;

So, any player who MLB teams value with at least a 3 year year, $24 million contract has to be considered above average.  

Do you think Miguel Batista is above average? Jarrod Washburn? Carlos Silva? Kenji Johjima? Jose Guillen? Barry Zito? 

I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;re going to say no, but those players all fit the criteria you just laid out.  What&#039;s the difference?

&lt;em&gt;Raul hits, drives in runs and has been at the top offensively for outfielders for three years.&lt;/em&gt;

The top offensively of what? From 2006 to 2008, Ibanez ranks 36th in the majors in home runs and 48th in slugging percentage.  Even if you just compare to outfielders, he ranks 14th and 23rd.  Do you think home runs and slugging percentage are esoteric numbers?

The myth of how good Ibanez is as a hitter has been advanced by the media, who are almost unanimously awful at player valuation.  There&#039;s literally nothing you could point to that would support the case that Ibanez is a &quot;top offensive performer&quot;.  It&#039;s just not true.  

&lt;em&gt;But this website appears to want to get rid of out best offensive players–Raul, Lopez, et al. and replace them with Branyon (who was a good sign) and Nelson and other insignificant but statistically “projectible” nothing.&lt;/em&gt;

Actually, this website wants this team to get better, and recognizes that defense is massively undervalued, and the quickest way for this team to put a quality product on the field would be to upgrade the defense, which starts by getting Raul out of left field.  

&lt;em&gt;Keep Lopez, Keep Yuni, Keep Raul, Keep Beltre, Keep Ichiro, Play Vlad, Play Clement and address the weaknesses.&lt;/em&gt;

If you keep Raul in left field, you are not addressing the weaknesses.  

&lt;em&gt;Don’t blame the best players for the rest of the drivel&lt;/em&gt;.

We&#039;re not - the best players on this team are Beltre, Ichiro, and Felix.  Ibanez is a marginal role player who simply isn&#039;t as good as you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>To list Raul as a below average player when people who have actually worked and succeeded in the business appear willing to give him two to three years at at least eight million a year makes it seem to me that you have fallen in love with some esoteric statistical analysis.</em></p>
<p>So, any player who MLB teams value with at least a 3 year year, $24 million contract has to be considered above average.  </p>
<p>Do you think Miguel Batista is above average? Jarrod Washburn? Carlos Silva? Kenji Johjima? Jose Guillen? Barry Zito? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you&#8217;re going to say no, but those players all fit the criteria you just laid out.  What&#8217;s the difference?</p>
<p><em>Raul hits, drives in runs and has been at the top offensively for outfielders for three years.</em></p>
<p>The top offensively of what? From 2006 to 2008, Ibanez ranks 36th in the majors in home runs and 48th in slugging percentage.  Even if you just compare to outfielders, he ranks 14th and 23rd.  Do you think home runs and slugging percentage are esoteric numbers?</p>
<p>The myth of how good Ibanez is as a hitter has been advanced by the media, who are almost unanimously awful at player valuation.  There&#8217;s literally nothing you could point to that would support the case that Ibanez is a &#8220;top offensive performer&#8221;.  It&#8217;s just not true.  </p>
<p><em>But this website appears to want to get rid of out best offensive players–Raul, Lopez, et al. and replace them with Branyon (who was a good sign) and Nelson and other insignificant but statistically “projectible” nothing.</em></p>
<p>Actually, this website wants this team to get better, and recognizes that defense is massively undervalued, and the quickest way for this team to put a quality product on the field would be to upgrade the defense, which starts by getting Raul out of left field.  </p>
<p><em>Keep Lopez, Keep Yuni, Keep Raul, Keep Beltre, Keep Ichiro, Play Vlad, Play Clement and address the weaknesses.</em></p>
<p>If you keep Raul in left field, you are not addressing the weaknesses.  </p>
<p><em>Don’t blame the best players for the rest of the drivel</em>.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not &#8211; the best players on this team are Beltre, Ichiro, and Felix.  Ibanez is a marginal role player who simply isn&#8217;t as good as you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopilots70</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306229</link>
		<dc:creator>gopilots70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306229</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed reading this website for a long time though I often disagree. But today, when I saw the post that compared Raul, and Ken and Russell as similar players it astounded me.  To list Raul as a below average player when people who have actually worked and succeeded in the business appear willing to give him two to three years at at least eight million a year makes it seem to me that you have fallen in love with some esoteric statistical analysis.  Raul hits, drives in runs  and has been at the top offensively for outfielders for three years.  But this website appears to want to get rid of out best offensive players--Raul, Lopez, et al. and replace them with Branyon (who was a good sign) and Nelson and other insignificant but statistically &quot;projectible&quot; nothing.  Keep Lopez, Keep Yuni, Keep Raul, Keep Beltre, Keep Ichiro, Play Vlad, Play Clement and address the weaknesses.  Don&#039;t blame the best players for the rest of the drivel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed reading this website for a long time though I often disagree. But today, when I saw the post that compared Raul, and Ken and Russell as similar players it astounded me.  To list Raul as a below average player when people who have actually worked and succeeded in the business appear willing to give him two to three years at at least eight million a year makes it seem to me that you have fallen in love with some esoteric statistical analysis.  Raul hits, drives in runs  and has been at the top offensively for outfielders for three years.  But this website appears to want to get rid of out best offensive players&#8211;Raul, Lopez, et al. and replace them with Branyon (who was a good sign) and Nelson and other insignificant but statistically &#8220;projectible&#8221; nothing.  Keep Lopez, Keep Yuni, Keep Raul, Keep Beltre, Keep Ichiro, Play Vlad, Play Clement and address the weaknesses.  Don&#8217;t blame the best players for the rest of the drivel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breadbaker</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306227</link>
		<dc:creator>Breadbaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306227</guid>
		<description>Edmonds is another one whose expiration date has passed.  Though if we signed Adam Everett and Jim Edmonds, we might increase attendance from Snohomish County (j/k).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edmonds is another one whose expiration date has passed.  Though if we signed Adam Everett and Jim Edmonds, we might increase attendance from Snohomish County (j/k).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306217</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306217</guid>
		<description>dreaaaaaaaam when I&#039;m feeling blue ...... dreaaaaaaaam that&#039;s the thing to do 


so, how &#039;bout those RJ to the A&#039;s rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dreaaaaaaaam when I&#8217;m feeling blue &#8230;&#8230; dreaaaaaaaam that&#8217;s the thing to do </p>
<p>so, how &#8217;bout those RJ to the A&#8217;s rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor H</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/04/6812/comment-page-1/#comment-306211</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6812#comment-306211</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Randy’s not going to sign here. You should give up that notion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let us dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Randy’s not going to sign here. You should give up that notion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let us dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
