<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Franklin Gutierrez Is Really, Really Good At Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners and general baseball discussion with David Cameron and Derek Zumsteg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:35:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-341590</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-341590</guid>
		<description>Looking back at this thread from the vantage of July &#039;09 with the team over .500 and so much of the success of the pitching staff so obviously owed to the outfield defense, some of these comments seem downright laughable.  I don&#039;t know where some of these commenters are (they don&#039;t seem to be around now, at least under those names) but whereever they are I hope they&#039;re big enough to admit that Dave was right and they were wrong.  Gutierrez is an elite defender, and it matters.  A lot.  Oh, and his bat seems to coming along too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking back at this thread from the vantage of July &#8216;09 with the team over .500 and so much of the success of the pitching staff so obviously owed to the outfield defense, some of these comments seem downright laughable.  I don&#8217;t know where some of these commenters are (they don&#8217;t seem to be around now, at least under those names) but whereever they are I hope they&#8217;re big enough to admit that Dave was right and they were wrong.  Gutierrez is an elite defender, and it matters.  A lot.  Oh, and his bat seems to coming along too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306831</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306831</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Joser was joking that Z might build a no hit, all glove team as if it was bad just to make a point., but in all seriousness, if you had a team that could save 300 runs with the glove a year, but hit for 100 less, they would be just as good as an average fielding, 200 runs above average offensive team.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, but if the offense is 300 runs less, then it&#039;s a wash. Though that STILL puts the advantage to the Mariners--younger, cheaper players.

 Only scenario where it hurts is if the loss in the offense is larger than the gain in defense. Dave and other people think the gain in defense offsets the loss in offense. You can&#039;t really disprove that by saying &quot;you still got to score runs.&quot; An anemic offense can still win if your pitching and defense makes the opposing offense even more anemic.

This still points up the rawness of defensive stats. People look at .750 and .800 OPS and feel comfortable with them. They look at the defensive stats and don&#039;t feel comfortable--let alone looking at the resulting run differentials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Joser was joking that Z might build a no hit, all glove team as if it was bad just to make a point., but in all seriousness, if you had a team that could save 300 runs with the glove a year, but hit for 100 less, they would be just as good as an average fielding, 200 runs above average offensive team.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but if the offense is 300 runs less, then it&#8217;s a wash. Though that STILL puts the advantage to the Mariners&#8211;younger, cheaper players.</p>
<p> Only scenario where it hurts is if the loss in the offense is larger than the gain in defense. Dave and other people think the gain in defense offsets the loss in offense. You can&#8217;t really disprove that by saying &#8220;you still got to score runs.&#8221; An anemic offense can still win if your pitching and defense makes the opposing offense even more anemic.</p>
<p>This still points up the rawness of defensive stats. People look at .750 and .800 OPS and feel comfortable with them. They look at the defensive stats and don&#8217;t feel comfortable&#8211;let alone looking at the resulting run differentials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave6267</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306819</link>
		<dc:creator>dave6267</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306819</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Sure, preventing runs is just as important as scoring them, but not more so, and this team can’t score runs.&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t think you are acknowledging that they are equal. Saving ten runs with the glove is just as good as ten with the bat.

Joser was joking that Z might build a no hit, all glove team as if it was bad just to make a point., but in all seriousness, if you had a team that could save 300 runs with the glove a year, but hit for 100 less, they would be just as good as an average fielding, 200 runs above average offensive team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Sure, preventing runs is just as important as scoring them, but not more so, and this team can’t score runs.</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you are acknowledging that they are equal. Saving ten runs with the glove is just as good as ten with the bat.</p>
<p>Joser was joking that Z might build a no hit, all glove team as if it was bad just to make a point., but in all seriousness, if you had a team that could save 300 runs with the glove a year, but hit for 100 less, they would be just as good as an average fielding, 200 runs above average offensive team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomG</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306818</link>
		<dc:creator>TomG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306818</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is what smart teams do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;When you stop trying to acquire good players, and start trying to acquire players who are good at a certain thing, you make bad choices.&lt;/em&gt;

Does this not apply here? Gutierrez is, for all intents and purposes, a defensive specialist with limited offensive upside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is what smart teams do.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>When you stop trying to acquire good players, and start trying to acquire players who are good at a certain thing, you make bad choices.</em></p>
<p>Does this not apply here? Gutierrez is, for all intents and purposes, a defensive specialist with limited offensive upside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmbaseball7</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306816</link>
		<dc:creator>pmbaseball7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306816</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I just wish we got rid of Yuni and signed Izturis, but I guess we’re stuck with that fat turd for another year.&lt;/em&gt;

hahahahaha I love it. Now we have to see if Raul can whip him in to shape. 
Anyways Gutierrez is a good pickup even if he doesn&#039;t hit that well his defense makes up for it. And I can see the deal working for the Indians w/out Chavez because Gutierrez isn&#039;t even a starter for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I just wish we got rid of Yuni and signed Izturis, but I guess we’re stuck with that fat turd for another year.</em></p>
<p>hahahahaha I love it. Now we have to see if Raul can whip him in to shape.<br />
Anyways Gutierrez is a good pickup even if he doesn&#8217;t hit that well his defense makes up for it. And I can see the deal working for the Indians w/out Chavez because Gutierrez isn&#8217;t even a starter for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306815</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306815</guid>
		<description>Forgot to add link-

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081210&amp;content_id=3712317&amp;vkey=news_nym&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=nym&amp;partnerId=rss_nym</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add link-</p>
<p><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081210&amp;content_id=3712317&amp;vkey=news_nym&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=nym&amp;partnerId=rss_nym" rel="nofollow">http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081210&amp;content_id=3712317&amp;vkey=news_nym&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=nym&amp;partnerId=rss_nym</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306814</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306814</guid>
		<description>Puckett just pimped the trade on KJR by reciting Gutierrez&#039; offensive stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puckett just pimped the trade on KJR by reciting Gutierrez&#8217; offensive stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306812</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306812</guid>
		<description>Done deal...

The Mariners give up Putz, Green, and Reed and get Heilman, Chavez, Carp, and Gutierrez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done deal&#8230;</p>
<p>The Mariners give up Putz, Green, and Reed and get Heilman, Chavez, Carp, and Gutierrez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thr33niL</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306807</link>
		<dc:creator>thr33niL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306807</guid>
		<description>Would Chavez really be starting?

An OF of Chavez/Gutierrez/Ichiro would be one of the best defensive outfields in baseball.  On the flip side, it would be the &lt;strong&gt;worst&lt;/strong&gt; offensive outfield in baseball.

Combine that with sketchy infield defensive unit (aside from Beltre) that doesn&#039;t contain true offensive clout and please explain how this team is going to be good?

If this is a precursor to something more to come, I may change my view, but as it sits now, it looks pretty bad to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would Chavez really be starting?</p>
<p>An OF of Chavez/Gutierrez/Ichiro would be one of the best defensive outfields in baseball.  On the flip side, it would be the <strong>worst</strong> offensive outfield in baseball.</p>
<p>Combine that with sketchy infield defensive unit (aside from Beltre) that doesn&#8217;t contain true offensive clout and please explain how this team is going to be good?</p>
<p>If this is a precursor to something more to come, I may change my view, but as it sits now, it looks pretty bad to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomG</title>
		<link>http://ussmariner.com/2008/12/10/franklin-gutierrez-is-really-really-good-at-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-306808</link>
		<dc:creator>TomG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6862#comment-306808</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s Gutierrez best-case scenario? He turns into Jay Payton with slightly better defense and less patience? 

Well, I guess his offensive approach of swing-at-anything, low-weight OBP, and disappointing production from a key offensive position (assuming he slots into either corner outfield spot) will be in line with the Mariners&#039; philosophy of the past few seasons. But at least the defense will be markedly improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s Gutierrez best-case scenario? He turns into Jay Payton with slightly better defense and less patience? </p>
<p>Well, I guess his offensive approach of swing-at-anything, low-weight OBP, and disappointing production from a key offensive position (assuming he slots into either corner outfield spot) will be in line with the Mariners&#8217; philosophy of the past few seasons. But at least the defense will be markedly improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
