Who gets the last ten million?

DMZ · December 8, 2006 at 10:14 am · Filed Under Mariners 

The M’s have money in the budget. They haven’t made a name signing to appease the restless natives. They need another starting pitcher. But there’s only maybe $10m left in the budget?

Who gets it? Quick, before they make a move.

wrss fhccna

Comments

146 Responses to “Who gets the last ten million?”

  1. DMZ on December 8th, 2006 12:29 pm

    I’d also like to point to 73/77/89 is a great example of what happens when people get flagged for comment moderation for whatever reason. It just never goes well.

  2. strong silence on December 8th, 2006 12:32 pm

    Playoff experience is key. It’s an intangible that is underrated.

  3. Steve T on December 8th, 2006 12:32 pm

    I didn’t anybody knew what ROT13 was anymore.
    Suppan’ll be great: mediocre AND a religious kook.

  4. MarinerDan on December 8th, 2006 12:33 pm

    Curious, why was the BA prospect list deleted? Copyright issues? If so, I will refrain from posting in that manner in the future. Really, though, all I did was copy the list 1-10 and gave proper credit. Fair use, no?

  5. DMZ on December 8th, 2006 12:34 pm

    It was a thread hijack and I had another post in the queue.

    Plus, I hate thread hijacks. It’s rude. I wish people would knock it off.

  6. stoyboy on December 8th, 2006 12:40 pm

    Trade Sexon to Baltimore for Lopez and Cabrera,+cash(move Ibanez to first) and then sign Zito.5/85… maybe the season will be saved after all…or maybe not

  7. MarinerDan on December 8th, 2006 12:40 pm

    Jeez, sorry. This thing seemed sort of like a daily news thread, to me.

    I was only responding to a previous post.

  8. DMZ on December 8th, 2006 12:42 pm

    I…. don’t see that. But whatever. I deleted the other post too.

  9. squidbilly on December 8th, 2006 12:48 pm

    They should spend the 10 million on apology cards for all their fans.

  10. DrJ on December 8th, 2006 12:49 pm

    stoyboy, why on Earth would Baltimore trade Lopez AND Cabrera for Sexson?? Did I miss a transaction…did Peter Angelos decide to operate the ballclub himself? Even Mike Flanagan wouldn’t touch that deal.

    The point of this thread, of course, is that this ballclub as currently operated is more than $10M in salary away from relevance in the AL West, unless some other GM gives us talent free that we cannot reasonably pay for.

    Sad.

  11. chrisisasavage on December 8th, 2006 12:49 pm

    Hmmm, Lopez and Cabrera for Sexson would be the rip-off of the century (well not quite), almost as good for the winning team as that Soriano for Horacio Ramirez trad… oh, wait.

    Well, it wouldn’t totally surprise me, only becuase Bavasi seems to follow up idiocy with brilliance and visa-versa, so who knows, but it’d be a like a .01% chance type trade. Of course, we should be sitting like vultures waiting for Baltimore to give up on Cabrera, if they ever do, which is also like a .01% chance of happening, but it’s not totally unprecedented, even if it would be totally stupid of them.

  12. strong silence on December 8th, 2006 12:50 pm

    Ibanez + $$ for Brandon McCarthy. Hey, it fills needs.

  13. MarinerDan on December 8th, 2006 12:53 pm

    Well, it wouldn’t totally surprise me, only becuase Bavasi seems to follow up idiocy with brilliance and visa-versa, so who knows, but it’d be a like a .01% chance type trade. Of course, we should be sitting like vultures waiting for Baltimore to give up on Cabrera, if they ever do, which is also like a .01% chance of happening, but it’s not totally unprecedented, even if it would be totally stupid of them.

    Just curious, but what “brilliance” can you point to in the Bavasi era?

  14. DMZ on December 8th, 2006 12:53 pm

    $10m or under. One pitcher.

    Come on, this isn’t that hard.

  15. bradderup on December 8th, 2006 12:57 pm

    #7: A dinner for Hargrove and Princess Wille.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  16. eponymous coward on December 8th, 2006 1:10 pm

    $10m or under. One pitcher.

    Come on, this isn’t that hard.

    Why do I feel like Sean Connery should be saying “That’s not what your mother said last night!” right about now, based on the last couple of threads?

    PS: I’d like to ask USSM posters once again to please refrain from using ethnic slurs…

  17. Russ on December 8th, 2006 1:12 pm

    They should spend the 10 million on apology cards for all their fans.

    I think you have over estimated what remains of the fan base after the last few seasons.

  18. Russ on December 8th, 2006 1:13 pm

    Weaver, Jeff

    That is all…

  19. Wishhiker on December 8th, 2006 1:14 pm

    This is rediculous. That we should be talking about Suppan and Mulder in the $10M a year range shows how bad the market has inflated for pitchers. Those are the 2 I wouldn’t mind seeing signed to incentive laden deals, but with this market the team has to take the risk of injury and decline.

    If other moves could be involved I’d say Sexson traded for MiLers, defensive 1bman signed on the cheap to compete or platoon with LaHair and Pettitte signed for 3/54 with the last 2 being player option years.

  20. JeffS on December 8th, 2006 1:19 pm

    DMZ — Jeff Weaver 🙁

  21. Johan on December 8th, 2006 1:19 pm

    Yankees signed Pettite to 1 yr/16 million deal. Scratch him off the list……

  22. JMHawkins on December 8th, 2006 1:22 pm

    Add me to the Mulder camp. Have an incentive-laden option clause that lets us drop him if he comes back as Gil Meche, but can turn into a multi-year deal if he comes back as, well, Mark Mulder.

  23. Deanna on December 8th, 2006 1:31 pm

    I’m probably behind on reality lately, but I thought it’d be funny to suggest Chan Ho Park anyway.

  24. PositivePaul on December 8th, 2006 1:32 pm

    Hmm. Maybe the M’s could invest in a few of these Lichtenstein pictures of pitchers.

    At $16,500 a piece, they could corner the art market on them and drive them up. After all, Bavasi has driven up the price for crappy starting pitching in the trade market now. Certainly he could do the same with limited-edition art?

  25. Coach Owens on December 8th, 2006 1:37 pm

    Tony Armas, Bruce Chen, Shawn Estes, RYAN FRANKLIN! OH YEAH!!!

  26. BoratForPresident on December 8th, 2006 1:53 pm

    Carl Pavano is due $10M this year, I’m willing to bet it ends up coming from the M’s, or at least part of it does.

  27. marbledog on December 8th, 2006 2:08 pm

    Hopefully most of it goes towards the Hargrove-Bavasi Severance Package Fund.

    Best answer so far.

  28. jeffs98119 on December 8th, 2006 2:23 pm

    [ot]

  29. JoeM on December 8th, 2006 2:36 pm

    Me

  30. stoyboy on December 8th, 2006 2:53 pm

    DRJ: 1)The Orioles want to trade Lopez
    2)Sexon hits more HR/RBI than Millar and can protect Tejada
    3)Orioles need some pop in that lineup
    4)Orioles have a lot of vets and young pitchers for their
    rotation left
    5)Orioles need a big signing
    6)Cabrera is not as good now as he will be(Will the Orioles
    wait)?
    7)It is a good trade for both teams

  31. NBarnes on December 8th, 2006 3:05 pm

    Sign nobody unless another starting pitcher with good upside washes up on the shore. Extend Ichiro.

  32. Evan on December 8th, 2006 3:08 pm

    How is Ryan Franklin a free agent? I thought Gillick gave him a 2 year deal?

    Or has it been 2 years already?

  33. Evan on December 8th, 2006 3:09 pm

    JoeM said: Me

    Joe Mays? Seriously? I’d rather have Fat-elvys.

  34. terry on December 8th, 2006 3:34 pm

    Alright my answer in #10 broke the rules by giving more than one name so here’s try #2…….

    Backloaded: Andy Pettitte 1 yr/$10M…. with $6M deferred… easily the best arm on the market this year assuming Roger retires and ignoring a certain posted player. Frankly he is the only arm on the market thats actually worth the contract he got (or in the case of the unsigned guys…will get)…

    Alright, I just broke the rules again but damn it, I want them to win… Here goes another try…

    More in spirit with the question: Mark Mulder (assuming he’s signable for $10M or under)… he’s got the rep, has playoff experience, is a lefty, is a *workhorse*, he’s an extreme groundball pitcher which plays to the defense (see folks we’re really smart), yadda, yadda, yadda…. we’ll ignore the injury and the peripherals… Truthfully, I’d probably go for it with a sensible duration.

    other guys: Baptista/Suppan

    Off topic: I have no freakin’ idea how Soriano+Ramirez (>$2.2M) is a better deal than Thomson at $4-5M……

  35. Spencer B on December 8th, 2006 4:21 pm

    Derek – noone can answer your question because there isn’t a good answer, right? At this point, I’d probably dangle a couple of established players for prospects, and go into rebuild mode. It ain’t happenin’ this year. Mediocre hitting, poor rotation, bad bullpen. I’d be in on anyone coming off injury or explainable bad performance with a low-risk, low-$ contract, and put an option at the back end.

    Choices: Mark Mulder, Eric Gagne, Chan Ho Park (this is not *that* crazy – he’s got more upside than Jeff Fricken Suppan), what’s the difference? I’d have been in on Kerry Wood and Octavio Dotel, too, for the same reason. They’re all for next year, anyway.

    I hope to hell that they can Bavasi prior to the trade deadline, as the M’s will be sellers with a lot to gain. That’s when you move Sexson, not now.

  36. PositivePaul on December 8th, 2006 4:31 pm

    $.4 million to lure Rich Amaral out of retirement, and $9 million (including travel expenses) for the experimental surgery in India that converts him into a league-average MLB pitcher, with the rest going into production costs for the Rick Rizzs/Rich Amaral 1995, 12 Years Later DVD.

  37. Jerry on December 8th, 2006 5:18 pm

    Mark Mulder

    I don’t like any of the remaining options. But Mulder is the only interesting guy who will be available on a one-year deal. If you are going to sign a pitcher in a market that doesn’t have any real good options, go for the short-term deal.

    Mulder has some upside too. With a team option for 2008, it makes sense.

    Tony Armas Jr. is a distant second.

  38. msb on December 8th, 2006 5:33 pm

    #136– how old is Beau Amaral these days? He used to do a wicked Randy Johnson when he was about 6….

  39. spokane dude on December 8th, 2006 5:53 pm

    I’d go for Mulder, but considering he probably doesn’t want to play here, I’d bet on Chan Ho Park. Oh, and maybe John Thomson with what’s left. (Yeah, I know, pick ONE guy.)

  40. Adam S on December 8th, 2006 8:15 pm

    Well, the name you’re looking for is Suppan. And really in terms of ERA 🙂 and xFIP he’s not a lot worse than Schmidt and better than Lilly or Schmidt. So relative to the market that would be a deal, even if he’s only a 3 win player.

    But I’d gamble on Mulder. Either last year’s HR% and LOB% were a fluke because he was hurt and he could return to star form or he’s done and he’ll retire.

  41. Adam S on December 8th, 2006 8:16 pm

    Oops, meant to say “better than Lilly or Meche”. I have Schmidt on the brain (insert your own joke here).

  42. overmanb on December 8th, 2006 9:23 pm

    If we go off xFIP, it’s definitely Suppan…

  43. Slovakian Mariner on December 9th, 2006 1:46 pm

    Roger Clemens

  44. Red Apple on December 9th, 2006 2:00 pm

    You forgot your sarcasm tags, Slov.

  45. Jared on December 9th, 2006 4:24 pm

    Brian Moehler

  46. Gomez on December 9th, 2006 5:43 pm

    I see you picked Jeff Suppan. I don’t disagree enough to pick a compelling alternative. Suppan will work.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.